Cargando…
Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of seven different decontamination methods (water, ZirClean(TM), 37% phosphoric acid, 9.5% hydrofluoric acid, Al(2)O(3) sandblasting, low-speed dental stone, and high-speed dental stone) on the fracture resistance, microstructure, and surface roughness of mono...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062356 |
_version_ | 1785016107516559360 |
---|---|
author | Darwich, Rama A. Awad, Manal Abou Neel, Ensanya A. |
author_facet | Darwich, Rama A. Awad, Manal Abou Neel, Ensanya A. |
author_sort | Darwich, Rama A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the effect of seven different decontamination methods (water, ZirClean(TM), 37% phosphoric acid, 9.5% hydrofluoric acid, Al(2)O(3) sandblasting, low-speed dental stone, and high-speed dental stone) on the fracture resistance, microstructure, and surface roughness of monolithic and multilayered zirconia. The as-received and sandblasted zirconia was used as a control. One-way ANOVA and t-test were performed. As-received monolithic zirconia was stronger (856 ± 94 MPa) than multilayered zirconia (348.4 ± 63 MPa). Only phosphoric acid (865 ± 141 MPa) and low-speed dental stone (959 ± 116 MPa) significantly increased the flexural strength of sandblasted monolithic zirconia (854 ± 99 MPa), but all tested decontamination methods except phosphoric acid (307 ± 57 MPa) and Al(2)O(3) (322 ± 69 MPa) significantly increased the flexural strength of sandblasted multilayered zirconia (325 ± 74 MPa). Different decontamination methods did not significantly affect the flexural modulus, but introduced irregularities in the crystal as well as deep surface flaws in both types of zirconia. The surface of sandblasted monolithic zirconia is more resistant to change than multilayered zirconia. Among different decontamination methods, a low-speed dental stone could be beneficial as it significantly increased the surface roughness and fracture resistance of both types of zirconia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10056380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100563802023-03-30 Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study Darwich, Rama A. Awad, Manal Abou Neel, Ensanya A. Materials (Basel) Article This study aimed to evaluate the effect of seven different decontamination methods (water, ZirClean(TM), 37% phosphoric acid, 9.5% hydrofluoric acid, Al(2)O(3) sandblasting, low-speed dental stone, and high-speed dental stone) on the fracture resistance, microstructure, and surface roughness of monolithic and multilayered zirconia. The as-received and sandblasted zirconia was used as a control. One-way ANOVA and t-test were performed. As-received monolithic zirconia was stronger (856 ± 94 MPa) than multilayered zirconia (348.4 ± 63 MPa). Only phosphoric acid (865 ± 141 MPa) and low-speed dental stone (959 ± 116 MPa) significantly increased the flexural strength of sandblasted monolithic zirconia (854 ± 99 MPa), but all tested decontamination methods except phosphoric acid (307 ± 57 MPa) and Al(2)O(3) (322 ± 69 MPa) significantly increased the flexural strength of sandblasted multilayered zirconia (325 ± 74 MPa). Different decontamination methods did not significantly affect the flexural modulus, but introduced irregularities in the crystal as well as deep surface flaws in both types of zirconia. The surface of sandblasted monolithic zirconia is more resistant to change than multilayered zirconia. Among different decontamination methods, a low-speed dental stone could be beneficial as it significantly increased the surface roughness and fracture resistance of both types of zirconia. MDPI 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10056380/ /pubmed/36984236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062356 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Darwich, Rama A. Awad, Manal Abou Neel, Ensanya A. Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study |
title | Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study |
title_full | Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study |
title_short | Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study |
title_sort | effect of different decontamination methods on fracture resistance, microstructure, and surface roughness of zirconia restorations—in vitro study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062356 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT darwichramaa effectofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsonfractureresistancemicrostructureandsurfaceroughnessofzirconiarestorationsinvitrostudy AT awadmanal effectofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsonfractureresistancemicrostructureandsurfaceroughnessofzirconiarestorationsinvitrostudy AT abouneelensanyaa effectofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsonfractureresistancemicrostructureandsurfaceroughnessofzirconiarestorationsinvitrostudy |