Cargando…

Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of seven different decontamination methods (water, ZirClean(TM), 37% phosphoric acid, 9.5% hydrofluoric acid, Al(2)O(3) sandblasting, low-speed dental stone, and high-speed dental stone) on the fracture resistance, microstructure, and surface roughness of mono...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Darwich, Rama A., Awad, Manal, Abou Neel, Ensanya A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062356
_version_ 1785016107516559360
author Darwich, Rama A.
Awad, Manal
Abou Neel, Ensanya A.
author_facet Darwich, Rama A.
Awad, Manal
Abou Neel, Ensanya A.
author_sort Darwich, Rama A.
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the effect of seven different decontamination methods (water, ZirClean(TM), 37% phosphoric acid, 9.5% hydrofluoric acid, Al(2)O(3) sandblasting, low-speed dental stone, and high-speed dental stone) on the fracture resistance, microstructure, and surface roughness of monolithic and multilayered zirconia. The as-received and sandblasted zirconia was used as a control. One-way ANOVA and t-test were performed. As-received monolithic zirconia was stronger (856 ± 94 MPa) than multilayered zirconia (348.4 ± 63 MPa). Only phosphoric acid (865 ± 141 MPa) and low-speed dental stone (959 ± 116 MPa) significantly increased the flexural strength of sandblasted monolithic zirconia (854 ± 99 MPa), but all tested decontamination methods except phosphoric acid (307 ± 57 MPa) and Al(2)O(3) (322 ± 69 MPa) significantly increased the flexural strength of sandblasted multilayered zirconia (325 ± 74 MPa). Different decontamination methods did not significantly affect the flexural modulus, but introduced irregularities in the crystal as well as deep surface flaws in both types of zirconia. The surface of sandblasted monolithic zirconia is more resistant to change than multilayered zirconia. Among different decontamination methods, a low-speed dental stone could be beneficial as it significantly increased the surface roughness and fracture resistance of both types of zirconia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10056380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100563802023-03-30 Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study Darwich, Rama A. Awad, Manal Abou Neel, Ensanya A. Materials (Basel) Article This study aimed to evaluate the effect of seven different decontamination methods (water, ZirClean(TM), 37% phosphoric acid, 9.5% hydrofluoric acid, Al(2)O(3) sandblasting, low-speed dental stone, and high-speed dental stone) on the fracture resistance, microstructure, and surface roughness of monolithic and multilayered zirconia. The as-received and sandblasted zirconia was used as a control. One-way ANOVA and t-test were performed. As-received monolithic zirconia was stronger (856 ± 94 MPa) than multilayered zirconia (348.4 ± 63 MPa). Only phosphoric acid (865 ± 141 MPa) and low-speed dental stone (959 ± 116 MPa) significantly increased the flexural strength of sandblasted monolithic zirconia (854 ± 99 MPa), but all tested decontamination methods except phosphoric acid (307 ± 57 MPa) and Al(2)O(3) (322 ± 69 MPa) significantly increased the flexural strength of sandblasted multilayered zirconia (325 ± 74 MPa). Different decontamination methods did not significantly affect the flexural modulus, but introduced irregularities in the crystal as well as deep surface flaws in both types of zirconia. The surface of sandblasted monolithic zirconia is more resistant to change than multilayered zirconia. Among different decontamination methods, a low-speed dental stone could be beneficial as it significantly increased the surface roughness and fracture resistance of both types of zirconia. MDPI 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10056380/ /pubmed/36984236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062356 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Darwich, Rama A.
Awad, Manal
Abou Neel, Ensanya A.
Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study
title Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study
title_full Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study
title_short Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations—In Vitro Study
title_sort effect of different decontamination methods on fracture resistance, microstructure, and surface roughness of zirconia restorations—in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062356
work_keys_str_mv AT darwichramaa effectofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsonfractureresistancemicrostructureandsurfaceroughnessofzirconiarestorationsinvitrostudy
AT awadmanal effectofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsonfractureresistancemicrostructureandsurfaceroughnessofzirconiarestorationsinvitrostudy
AT abouneelensanyaa effectofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsonfractureresistancemicrostructureandsurfaceroughnessofzirconiarestorationsinvitrostudy