Cargando…
Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries
(1) Background: The clinical benefits and procedural efficiencies of performing minimally invasive fusion procedures, such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) are becoming increasingly well established. Currently, Medicare does not provide reimbur...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030566 |
_version_ | 1785016109969178624 |
---|---|
author | Schlesinger, Scott M. Maggio, Dominic Lorio, Morgan P. Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe Block, Jon E. |
author_facet | Schlesinger, Scott M. Maggio, Dominic Lorio, Morgan P. Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe Block, Jon E. |
author_sort | Schlesinger, Scott M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: The clinical benefits and procedural efficiencies of performing minimally invasive fusion procedures, such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) are becoming increasingly well established. Currently, Medicare does not provide reimbursement for its beneficiaries eligible for TLIF in the ASC due to a lack of evidence regarding procedural safety. However, the initiation of the Hospital Without Walls program allowed for traditional hospital procedures to be relocated to other facilities such as ASCs, providing a unique opportunity to evaluate the utility of TLIF in the ASC in Medicare-age patients. (2) Methods: This single-center, retrospective study compared baseline characteristics, intraoperative variables, and 30-day postoperative safety outcomes between 48 Medicare-age patients undergoing TLIF in the ASC and 48 patients having the same procedure as hospital in-patients. All patients had a one-level TLIF using the VariLift(®)-LX expandable lumbar interbody fusion device. (3) Results: There were similar patient characteristics, procedural efficiency, and occurrence of clinical 30-day safety events between the two study groups. However, there was a marked and statistically significant difference in the median length of stay favoring TLIF patients treated in the ASC (23.9 h vs. 1.6 h, p = 0.001). All ASC-treated patients were discharged on the day of surgery. Postoperative visits to address adverse events were rare in either group. (4) Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that minimally invasive TLIF can be performed safely and efficiently in the ASC in Medicare-age patients. With same-day discharge, fusion procedures performed in the ASC offer a similar safety and more attractive cost–benefit profile for older patients than the same surgery undertaken in the traditional hospital setting. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should strongly consider extending the appropriate reimbursement codes (CPT (®) 22630, 22633) for minimally invasive TLIF and PLIF to the ASC Covered Procedure List so that Medicare-age patients can realize the clinical benefits of surgeries performed in this setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10056390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100563902023-03-30 Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries Schlesinger, Scott M. Maggio, Dominic Lorio, Morgan P. Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe Block, Jon E. J Pers Med Brief Report (1) Background: The clinical benefits and procedural efficiencies of performing minimally invasive fusion procedures, such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) are becoming increasingly well established. Currently, Medicare does not provide reimbursement for its beneficiaries eligible for TLIF in the ASC due to a lack of evidence regarding procedural safety. However, the initiation of the Hospital Without Walls program allowed for traditional hospital procedures to be relocated to other facilities such as ASCs, providing a unique opportunity to evaluate the utility of TLIF in the ASC in Medicare-age patients. (2) Methods: This single-center, retrospective study compared baseline characteristics, intraoperative variables, and 30-day postoperative safety outcomes between 48 Medicare-age patients undergoing TLIF in the ASC and 48 patients having the same procedure as hospital in-patients. All patients had a one-level TLIF using the VariLift(®)-LX expandable lumbar interbody fusion device. (3) Results: There were similar patient characteristics, procedural efficiency, and occurrence of clinical 30-day safety events between the two study groups. However, there was a marked and statistically significant difference in the median length of stay favoring TLIF patients treated in the ASC (23.9 h vs. 1.6 h, p = 0.001). All ASC-treated patients were discharged on the day of surgery. Postoperative visits to address adverse events were rare in either group. (4) Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that minimally invasive TLIF can be performed safely and efficiently in the ASC in Medicare-age patients. With same-day discharge, fusion procedures performed in the ASC offer a similar safety and more attractive cost–benefit profile for older patients than the same surgery undertaken in the traditional hospital setting. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should strongly consider extending the appropriate reimbursement codes (CPT (®) 22630, 22633) for minimally invasive TLIF and PLIF to the ASC Covered Procedure List so that Medicare-age patients can realize the clinical benefits of surgeries performed in this setting. MDPI 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10056390/ /pubmed/36983747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030566 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Schlesinger, Scott M. Maggio, Dominic Lorio, Morgan P. Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe Block, Jon E. Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries |
title | Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries |
title_full | Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries |
title_short | Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries |
title_sort | comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the ambulatory surgery center and traditional hospital settings, part 2: assessment of surgical safety in medicare beneficiaries |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030566 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schlesingerscottm comparisonoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionintheambulatorysurgerycenterandtraditionalhospitalsettingspart2assessmentofsurgicalsafetyinmedicarebeneficiaries AT maggiodominic comparisonoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionintheambulatorysurgerycenterandtraditionalhospitalsettingspart2assessmentofsurgicalsafetyinmedicarebeneficiaries AT loriomorganp comparisonoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionintheambulatorysurgerycenterandtraditionalhospitalsettingspart2assessmentofsurgicalsafetyinmedicarebeneficiaries AT lewandrowskikaiuwe comparisonoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionintheambulatorysurgerycenterandtraditionalhospitalsettingspart2assessmentofsurgicalsafetyinmedicarebeneficiaries AT blockjone comparisonoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionintheambulatorysurgerycenterandtraditionalhospitalsettingspart2assessmentofsurgicalsafetyinmedicarebeneficiaries |