Cargando…

Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries

(1) Background: The clinical benefits and procedural efficiencies of performing minimally invasive fusion procedures, such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) are becoming increasingly well established. Currently, Medicare does not provide reimbur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schlesinger, Scott M., Maggio, Dominic, Lorio, Morgan P., Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe, Block, Jon E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030566
_version_ 1785016109969178624
author Schlesinger, Scott M.
Maggio, Dominic
Lorio, Morgan P.
Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe
Block, Jon E.
author_facet Schlesinger, Scott M.
Maggio, Dominic
Lorio, Morgan P.
Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe
Block, Jon E.
author_sort Schlesinger, Scott M.
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: The clinical benefits and procedural efficiencies of performing minimally invasive fusion procedures, such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) are becoming increasingly well established. Currently, Medicare does not provide reimbursement for its beneficiaries eligible for TLIF in the ASC due to a lack of evidence regarding procedural safety. However, the initiation of the Hospital Without Walls program allowed for traditional hospital procedures to be relocated to other facilities such as ASCs, providing a unique opportunity to evaluate the utility of TLIF in the ASC in Medicare-age patients. (2) Methods: This single-center, retrospective study compared baseline characteristics, intraoperative variables, and 30-day postoperative safety outcomes between 48 Medicare-age patients undergoing TLIF in the ASC and 48 patients having the same procedure as hospital in-patients. All patients had a one-level TLIF using the VariLift(®)-LX expandable lumbar interbody fusion device. (3) Results: There were similar patient characteristics, procedural efficiency, and occurrence of clinical 30-day safety events between the two study groups. However, there was a marked and statistically significant difference in the median length of stay favoring TLIF patients treated in the ASC (23.9 h vs. 1.6 h, p = 0.001). All ASC-treated patients were discharged on the day of surgery. Postoperative visits to address adverse events were rare in either group. (4) Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that minimally invasive TLIF can be performed safely and efficiently in the ASC in Medicare-age patients. With same-day discharge, fusion procedures performed in the ASC offer a similar safety and more attractive cost–benefit profile for older patients than the same surgery undertaken in the traditional hospital setting. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should strongly consider extending the appropriate reimbursement codes (CPT (®) 22630, 22633) for minimally invasive TLIF and PLIF to the ASC Covered Procedure List so that Medicare-age patients can realize the clinical benefits of surgeries performed in this setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10056390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100563902023-03-30 Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries Schlesinger, Scott M. Maggio, Dominic Lorio, Morgan P. Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe Block, Jon E. J Pers Med Brief Report (1) Background: The clinical benefits and procedural efficiencies of performing minimally invasive fusion procedures, such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) are becoming increasingly well established. Currently, Medicare does not provide reimbursement for its beneficiaries eligible for TLIF in the ASC due to a lack of evidence regarding procedural safety. However, the initiation of the Hospital Without Walls program allowed for traditional hospital procedures to be relocated to other facilities such as ASCs, providing a unique opportunity to evaluate the utility of TLIF in the ASC in Medicare-age patients. (2) Methods: This single-center, retrospective study compared baseline characteristics, intraoperative variables, and 30-day postoperative safety outcomes between 48 Medicare-age patients undergoing TLIF in the ASC and 48 patients having the same procedure as hospital in-patients. All patients had a one-level TLIF using the VariLift(®)-LX expandable lumbar interbody fusion device. (3) Results: There were similar patient characteristics, procedural efficiency, and occurrence of clinical 30-day safety events between the two study groups. However, there was a marked and statistically significant difference in the median length of stay favoring TLIF patients treated in the ASC (23.9 h vs. 1.6 h, p = 0.001). All ASC-treated patients were discharged on the day of surgery. Postoperative visits to address adverse events were rare in either group. (4) Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that minimally invasive TLIF can be performed safely and efficiently in the ASC in Medicare-age patients. With same-day discharge, fusion procedures performed in the ASC offer a similar safety and more attractive cost–benefit profile for older patients than the same surgery undertaken in the traditional hospital setting. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should strongly consider extending the appropriate reimbursement codes (CPT (®) 22630, 22633) for minimally invasive TLIF and PLIF to the ASC Covered Procedure List so that Medicare-age patients can realize the clinical benefits of surgeries performed in this setting. MDPI 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10056390/ /pubmed/36983747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030566 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Schlesinger, Scott M.
Maggio, Dominic
Lorio, Morgan P.
Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe
Block, Jon E.
Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries
title Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries
title_full Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries
title_fullStr Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries
title_short Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries
title_sort comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the ambulatory surgery center and traditional hospital settings, part 2: assessment of surgical safety in medicare beneficiaries
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030566
work_keys_str_mv AT schlesingerscottm comparisonoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionintheambulatorysurgerycenterandtraditionalhospitalsettingspart2assessmentofsurgicalsafetyinmedicarebeneficiaries
AT maggiodominic comparisonoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionintheambulatorysurgerycenterandtraditionalhospitalsettingspart2assessmentofsurgicalsafetyinmedicarebeneficiaries
AT loriomorganp comparisonoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionintheambulatorysurgerycenterandtraditionalhospitalsettingspart2assessmentofsurgicalsafetyinmedicarebeneficiaries
AT lewandrowskikaiuwe comparisonoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionintheambulatorysurgerycenterandtraditionalhospitalsettingspart2assessmentofsurgicalsafetyinmedicarebeneficiaries
AT blockjone comparisonoftransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionintheambulatorysurgerycenterandtraditionalhospitalsettingspart2assessmentofsurgicalsafetyinmedicarebeneficiaries