Cargando…

Long-Term Survival Rate of ATOMS Implant for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence and Management of Late Complications

Background: stress urinary incontinence (SUI) still represents a major drawback of prostate surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate long term efficacy, safety and survival of ATOMS system implant in a single center. Methods: we retrospectively included al consecutive patients treated with ATOM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giammò, Alessandro, Ammirati, Enrico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062296
_version_ 1785016210795003904
author Giammò, Alessandro
Ammirati, Enrico
author_facet Giammò, Alessandro
Ammirati, Enrico
author_sort Giammò, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description Background: stress urinary incontinence (SUI) still represents a major drawback of prostate surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate long term efficacy, safety and survival of ATOMS system implant in a single center. Methods: we retrospectively included al consecutive patients treated with ATOMS implant for SUI from October 2014 to July 2019. Patients received anamnesis, urodynamic evaluation, pre- and postoperative 24 h pad test and count. Patients were considered “continent” when dry or when wearing a security pad (social continence). Results: we treated99 patientswith median age 77.98 years (IQR 72.7–82.52). Most of the patients had undergone radical prostatectomy. Median follow-up was 62.9 months (IQR 47.5–75.9). At last follow-up 74 (74.7%) patients reported continence. We had 21 early (<30 days) postoperative complications, all Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade 1 [11 temporary perineal pain, 4 urinary retention, 3 scrotal edema, 2 superficial wound dehiscence, 1 dysuria]. We had late postoperative complications in 28 patients [7 port dislocations requiring surgical repositioning (CD 3a), 6 device removals (CD 3a) due to port erosion (2), inefficacy (2), cushion leakage (1), mesh detachment (1), perineal pain (5), 2 cases of port extrusion solved with port removal leaving the device in place (CD 3a), 2 superficial wound dehiscence (CD 1), 2 UTI (CD 1), 1 scrotal edema (CD 1), 1 cushion deflate (CD 1), 1 dysuria (CD 1), 1 perineal pain (CD 1)]. The survival of the device was 97% at 12 months, 93% at 24 months, 91% at 36 months, 90% at 48 months and 87.9% at 60 months. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the good safety and efficacy of ATOMS implant for the treatment of SUI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10056794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100567942023-03-30 Long-Term Survival Rate of ATOMS Implant for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence and Management of Late Complications Giammò, Alessandro Ammirati, Enrico J Clin Med Article Background: stress urinary incontinence (SUI) still represents a major drawback of prostate surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate long term efficacy, safety and survival of ATOMS system implant in a single center. Methods: we retrospectively included al consecutive patients treated with ATOMS implant for SUI from October 2014 to July 2019. Patients received anamnesis, urodynamic evaluation, pre- and postoperative 24 h pad test and count. Patients were considered “continent” when dry or when wearing a security pad (social continence). Results: we treated99 patientswith median age 77.98 years (IQR 72.7–82.52). Most of the patients had undergone radical prostatectomy. Median follow-up was 62.9 months (IQR 47.5–75.9). At last follow-up 74 (74.7%) patients reported continence. We had 21 early (<30 days) postoperative complications, all Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade 1 [11 temporary perineal pain, 4 urinary retention, 3 scrotal edema, 2 superficial wound dehiscence, 1 dysuria]. We had late postoperative complications in 28 patients [7 port dislocations requiring surgical repositioning (CD 3a), 6 device removals (CD 3a) due to port erosion (2), inefficacy (2), cushion leakage (1), mesh detachment (1), perineal pain (5), 2 cases of port extrusion solved with port removal leaving the device in place (CD 3a), 2 superficial wound dehiscence (CD 1), 2 UTI (CD 1), 1 scrotal edema (CD 1), 1 cushion deflate (CD 1), 1 dysuria (CD 1), 1 perineal pain (CD 1)]. The survival of the device was 97% at 12 months, 93% at 24 months, 91% at 36 months, 90% at 48 months and 87.9% at 60 months. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the good safety and efficacy of ATOMS implant for the treatment of SUI. MDPI 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10056794/ /pubmed/36983297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062296 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Giammò, Alessandro
Ammirati, Enrico
Long-Term Survival Rate of ATOMS Implant for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence and Management of Late Complications
title Long-Term Survival Rate of ATOMS Implant for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence and Management of Late Complications
title_full Long-Term Survival Rate of ATOMS Implant for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence and Management of Late Complications
title_fullStr Long-Term Survival Rate of ATOMS Implant for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence and Management of Late Complications
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Survival Rate of ATOMS Implant for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence and Management of Late Complications
title_short Long-Term Survival Rate of ATOMS Implant for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence and Management of Late Complications
title_sort long-term survival rate of atoms implant for male stress urinary incontinence and management of late complications
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062296
work_keys_str_mv AT giammoalessandro longtermsurvivalrateofatomsimplantformalestressurinaryincontinenceandmanagementoflatecomplications
AT ammiratienrico longtermsurvivalrateofatomsimplantformalestressurinaryincontinenceandmanagementoflatecomplications