Cargando…
Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors
This paper compares different low-cost sensors that can measure (5G) RF-EMF exposure. The sensors are either commercially available (off-the-shelf Software Defined Radio (SDR) Adalm Pluto) or constructed by a research institution (i.e., imec-WAVES, Ghent University and Smart Sensor Systems research...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36992024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23063312 |
_version_ | 1785016254100144128 |
---|---|
author | Deprez, Kenneth Colussi, Loek Korkmaz, Erdal Aerts, Sam Land, Derek Littel, Stephan Verloock, Leen Plets, David Joseph, Wout Bolte, John |
author_facet | Deprez, Kenneth Colussi, Loek Korkmaz, Erdal Aerts, Sam Land, Derek Littel, Stephan Verloock, Leen Plets, David Joseph, Wout Bolte, John |
author_sort | Deprez, Kenneth |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper compares different low-cost sensors that can measure (5G) RF-EMF exposure. The sensors are either commercially available (off-the-shelf Software Defined Radio (SDR) Adalm Pluto) or constructed by a research institution (i.e., imec-WAVES, Ghent University and Smart Sensor Systems research group (S³R), The Hague University of Applied Sciences). Both in-lab (GTEM cell) and in-situ measurements have been performed for this comparison. The in-lab measurements tested the linearity and sensitivity, which can then be used to calibrate the sensors. The in-situ testing confirmed that the low-cost hardware sensors and SDR can be used to assess the RF-EMF radiation. The variability between the sensors was 1.78 dB on average, with a maximum deviation of 5.26 dB. Values between 0.09 V/m and 2.44 V/m were obtained at a distance of about 50 m from the base station. These devices can be used to provide the general public and governments with temporal and spatial 5G electromagnetic field values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10056984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100569842023-03-30 Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors Deprez, Kenneth Colussi, Loek Korkmaz, Erdal Aerts, Sam Land, Derek Littel, Stephan Verloock, Leen Plets, David Joseph, Wout Bolte, John Sensors (Basel) Article This paper compares different low-cost sensors that can measure (5G) RF-EMF exposure. The sensors are either commercially available (off-the-shelf Software Defined Radio (SDR) Adalm Pluto) or constructed by a research institution (i.e., imec-WAVES, Ghent University and Smart Sensor Systems research group (S³R), The Hague University of Applied Sciences). Both in-lab (GTEM cell) and in-situ measurements have been performed for this comparison. The in-lab measurements tested the linearity and sensitivity, which can then be used to calibrate the sensors. The in-situ testing confirmed that the low-cost hardware sensors and SDR can be used to assess the RF-EMF radiation. The variability between the sensors was 1.78 dB on average, with a maximum deviation of 5.26 dB. Values between 0.09 V/m and 2.44 V/m were obtained at a distance of about 50 m from the base station. These devices can be used to provide the general public and governments with temporal and spatial 5G electromagnetic field values. MDPI 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10056984/ /pubmed/36992024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23063312 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Deprez, Kenneth Colussi, Loek Korkmaz, Erdal Aerts, Sam Land, Derek Littel, Stephan Verloock, Leen Plets, David Joseph, Wout Bolte, John Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors |
title | Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors |
title_full | Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors |
title_short | Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors |
title_sort | comparison of low-cost 5g electromagnetic field sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36992024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23063312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deprezkenneth comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors AT colussiloek comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors AT korkmazerdal comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors AT aertssam comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors AT landderek comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors AT littelstephan comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors AT verloockleen comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors AT pletsdavid comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors AT josephwout comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors AT boltejohn comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors |