Cargando…

Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors

This paper compares different low-cost sensors that can measure (5G) RF-EMF exposure. The sensors are either commercially available (off-the-shelf Software Defined Radio (SDR) Adalm Pluto) or constructed by a research institution (i.e., imec-WAVES, Ghent University and Smart Sensor Systems research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deprez, Kenneth, Colussi, Loek, Korkmaz, Erdal, Aerts, Sam, Land, Derek, Littel, Stephan, Verloock, Leen, Plets, David, Joseph, Wout, Bolte, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36992024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23063312
_version_ 1785016254100144128
author Deprez, Kenneth
Colussi, Loek
Korkmaz, Erdal
Aerts, Sam
Land, Derek
Littel, Stephan
Verloock, Leen
Plets, David
Joseph, Wout
Bolte, John
author_facet Deprez, Kenneth
Colussi, Loek
Korkmaz, Erdal
Aerts, Sam
Land, Derek
Littel, Stephan
Verloock, Leen
Plets, David
Joseph, Wout
Bolte, John
author_sort Deprez, Kenneth
collection PubMed
description This paper compares different low-cost sensors that can measure (5G) RF-EMF exposure. The sensors are either commercially available (off-the-shelf Software Defined Radio (SDR) Adalm Pluto) or constructed by a research institution (i.e., imec-WAVES, Ghent University and Smart Sensor Systems research group (S³R), The Hague University of Applied Sciences). Both in-lab (GTEM cell) and in-situ measurements have been performed for this comparison. The in-lab measurements tested the linearity and sensitivity, which can then be used to calibrate the sensors. The in-situ testing confirmed that the low-cost hardware sensors and SDR can be used to assess the RF-EMF radiation. The variability between the sensors was 1.78 dB on average, with a maximum deviation of 5.26 dB. Values between 0.09 V/m and 2.44 V/m were obtained at a distance of about 50 m from the base station. These devices can be used to provide the general public and governments with temporal and spatial 5G electromagnetic field values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10056984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100569842023-03-30 Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors Deprez, Kenneth Colussi, Loek Korkmaz, Erdal Aerts, Sam Land, Derek Littel, Stephan Verloock, Leen Plets, David Joseph, Wout Bolte, John Sensors (Basel) Article This paper compares different low-cost sensors that can measure (5G) RF-EMF exposure. The sensors are either commercially available (off-the-shelf Software Defined Radio (SDR) Adalm Pluto) or constructed by a research institution (i.e., imec-WAVES, Ghent University and Smart Sensor Systems research group (S³R), The Hague University of Applied Sciences). Both in-lab (GTEM cell) and in-situ measurements have been performed for this comparison. The in-lab measurements tested the linearity and sensitivity, which can then be used to calibrate the sensors. The in-situ testing confirmed that the low-cost hardware sensors and SDR can be used to assess the RF-EMF radiation. The variability between the sensors was 1.78 dB on average, with a maximum deviation of 5.26 dB. Values between 0.09 V/m and 2.44 V/m were obtained at a distance of about 50 m from the base station. These devices can be used to provide the general public and governments with temporal and spatial 5G electromagnetic field values. MDPI 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10056984/ /pubmed/36992024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23063312 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Deprez, Kenneth
Colussi, Loek
Korkmaz, Erdal
Aerts, Sam
Land, Derek
Littel, Stephan
Verloock, Leen
Plets, David
Joseph, Wout
Bolte, John
Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors
title Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors
title_full Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors
title_fullStr Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors
title_short Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors
title_sort comparison of low-cost 5g electromagnetic field sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36992024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23063312
work_keys_str_mv AT deprezkenneth comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors
AT colussiloek comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors
AT korkmazerdal comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors
AT aertssam comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors
AT landderek comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors
AT littelstephan comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors
AT verloockleen comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors
AT pletsdavid comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors
AT josephwout comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors
AT boltejohn comparisonoflowcost5gelectromagneticfieldsensors