Cargando…
Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs
The sandwich format immunoassay is generally more sensitive and specific than more common assay formats, including direct, indirect, or competitive. A sandwich assay, however, requires two receptors to bind non-competitively to the target analyte. Typically, pairs of antibodies (Abs) or antibody fra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10057555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36992515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15030807 |
_version_ | 1785016397631324160 |
---|---|
author | Sanders, Emily C. Santos, Alicia M. Nguyen, Eugene K. Gelston, Aidan A. Majumdar, Sudipta Weiss, Gregory A. |
author_facet | Sanders, Emily C. Santos, Alicia M. Nguyen, Eugene K. Gelston, Aidan A. Majumdar, Sudipta Weiss, Gregory A. |
author_sort | Sanders, Emily C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The sandwich format immunoassay is generally more sensitive and specific than more common assay formats, including direct, indirect, or competitive. A sandwich assay, however, requires two receptors to bind non-competitively to the target analyte. Typically, pairs of antibodies (Abs) or antibody fragments (Fabs) that are capable of forming a sandwiching with the target are identified through a slow, guess-and-check method with panels of candidate binding partners. Additionally, sandwich assays that are reliant on commercial antibodies can suffer from changes to reagent quality outside the researchers’ control. This report presents a reimagined and simplified phage display selection protocol that directly identifies sandwich binding peptides and Fabs. The approach yielded two sandwich pairs, one peptide–peptide and one Fab–peptide sandwich for the cancer and Parkinson’s disease biomarker DJ-1. Requiring just a few weeks to identify, the sandwich pairs delivered apparent affinity that is comparable to other commercial peptide and antibody sandwiches. The results reported here could expand the availability of sandwich binding partners for a wide range of clinical biomarker assays. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10057555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100575552023-03-30 Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs Sanders, Emily C. Santos, Alicia M. Nguyen, Eugene K. Gelston, Aidan A. Majumdar, Sudipta Weiss, Gregory A. Viruses Article The sandwich format immunoassay is generally more sensitive and specific than more common assay formats, including direct, indirect, or competitive. A sandwich assay, however, requires two receptors to bind non-competitively to the target analyte. Typically, pairs of antibodies (Abs) or antibody fragments (Fabs) that are capable of forming a sandwiching with the target are identified through a slow, guess-and-check method with panels of candidate binding partners. Additionally, sandwich assays that are reliant on commercial antibodies can suffer from changes to reagent quality outside the researchers’ control. This report presents a reimagined and simplified phage display selection protocol that directly identifies sandwich binding peptides and Fabs. The approach yielded two sandwich pairs, one peptide–peptide and one Fab–peptide sandwich for the cancer and Parkinson’s disease biomarker DJ-1. Requiring just a few weeks to identify, the sandwich pairs delivered apparent affinity that is comparable to other commercial peptide and antibody sandwiches. The results reported here could expand the availability of sandwich binding partners for a wide range of clinical biomarker assays. MDPI 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10057555/ /pubmed/36992515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15030807 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sanders, Emily C. Santos, Alicia M. Nguyen, Eugene K. Gelston, Aidan A. Majumdar, Sudipta Weiss, Gregory A. Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs |
title | Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs |
title_full | Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs |
title_fullStr | Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs |
title_full_unstemmed | Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs |
title_short | Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs |
title_sort | phage vs. phage: direct selections of sandwich binding pairs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10057555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36992515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15030807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandersemilyc phagevsphagedirectselectionsofsandwichbindingpairs AT santosaliciam phagevsphagedirectselectionsofsandwichbindingpairs AT nguyeneugenek phagevsphagedirectselectionsofsandwichbindingpairs AT gelstonaidana phagevsphagedirectselectionsofsandwichbindingpairs AT majumdarsudipta phagevsphagedirectselectionsofsandwichbindingpairs AT weissgregorya phagevsphagedirectselectionsofsandwichbindingpairs |