Cargando…

Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs

The sandwich format immunoassay is generally more sensitive and specific than more common assay formats, including direct, indirect, or competitive. A sandwich assay, however, requires two receptors to bind non-competitively to the target analyte. Typically, pairs of antibodies (Abs) or antibody fra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanders, Emily C., Santos, Alicia M., Nguyen, Eugene K., Gelston, Aidan A., Majumdar, Sudipta, Weiss, Gregory A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10057555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36992515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15030807
_version_ 1785016397631324160
author Sanders, Emily C.
Santos, Alicia M.
Nguyen, Eugene K.
Gelston, Aidan A.
Majumdar, Sudipta
Weiss, Gregory A.
author_facet Sanders, Emily C.
Santos, Alicia M.
Nguyen, Eugene K.
Gelston, Aidan A.
Majumdar, Sudipta
Weiss, Gregory A.
author_sort Sanders, Emily C.
collection PubMed
description The sandwich format immunoassay is generally more sensitive and specific than more common assay formats, including direct, indirect, or competitive. A sandwich assay, however, requires two receptors to bind non-competitively to the target analyte. Typically, pairs of antibodies (Abs) or antibody fragments (Fabs) that are capable of forming a sandwiching with the target are identified through a slow, guess-and-check method with panels of candidate binding partners. Additionally, sandwich assays that are reliant on commercial antibodies can suffer from changes to reagent quality outside the researchers’ control. This report presents a reimagined and simplified phage display selection protocol that directly identifies sandwich binding peptides and Fabs. The approach yielded two sandwich pairs, one peptide–peptide and one Fab–peptide sandwich for the cancer and Parkinson’s disease biomarker DJ-1. Requiring just a few weeks to identify, the sandwich pairs delivered apparent affinity that is comparable to other commercial peptide and antibody sandwiches. The results reported here could expand the availability of sandwich binding partners for a wide range of clinical biomarker assays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10057555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100575552023-03-30 Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs Sanders, Emily C. Santos, Alicia M. Nguyen, Eugene K. Gelston, Aidan A. Majumdar, Sudipta Weiss, Gregory A. Viruses Article The sandwich format immunoassay is generally more sensitive and specific than more common assay formats, including direct, indirect, or competitive. A sandwich assay, however, requires two receptors to bind non-competitively to the target analyte. Typically, pairs of antibodies (Abs) or antibody fragments (Fabs) that are capable of forming a sandwiching with the target are identified through a slow, guess-and-check method with panels of candidate binding partners. Additionally, sandwich assays that are reliant on commercial antibodies can suffer from changes to reagent quality outside the researchers’ control. This report presents a reimagined and simplified phage display selection protocol that directly identifies sandwich binding peptides and Fabs. The approach yielded two sandwich pairs, one peptide–peptide and one Fab–peptide sandwich for the cancer and Parkinson’s disease biomarker DJ-1. Requiring just a few weeks to identify, the sandwich pairs delivered apparent affinity that is comparable to other commercial peptide and antibody sandwiches. The results reported here could expand the availability of sandwich binding partners for a wide range of clinical biomarker assays. MDPI 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10057555/ /pubmed/36992515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15030807 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sanders, Emily C.
Santos, Alicia M.
Nguyen, Eugene K.
Gelston, Aidan A.
Majumdar, Sudipta
Weiss, Gregory A.
Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs
title Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs
title_full Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs
title_fullStr Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs
title_full_unstemmed Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs
title_short Phage vs. Phage: Direct Selections of Sandwich Binding Pairs
title_sort phage vs. phage: direct selections of sandwich binding pairs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10057555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36992515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15030807
work_keys_str_mv AT sandersemilyc phagevsphagedirectselectionsofsandwichbindingpairs
AT santosaliciam phagevsphagedirectselectionsofsandwichbindingpairs
AT nguyeneugenek phagevsphagedirectselectionsofsandwichbindingpairs
AT gelstonaidana phagevsphagedirectselectionsofsandwichbindingpairs
AT majumdarsudipta phagevsphagedirectselectionsofsandwichbindingpairs
AT weissgregorya phagevsphagedirectselectionsofsandwichbindingpairs