Cargando…
The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review
Background: Thoracolumbar burst fractures are a common traumatic vertebral fracture in the spine, and pedicle screw fixation has been widely performed as a safe and effective procedure. However, after the stabilization of the thoracolumbar burst fractures, whether or not to remove the pedicle screw...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10057639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983216 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062213 |
_version_ | 1785016418580824064 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xing Wu, Xiang-Dong Zhang, Yanbin Zhu, Zhenglin Jiang, Jile Li, Guanqing Liu, Jiacheng Shao, Jiashen Sun, Yuqing |
author_facet | Wang, Xing Wu, Xiang-Dong Zhang, Yanbin Zhu, Zhenglin Jiang, Jile Li, Guanqing Liu, Jiacheng Shao, Jiashen Sun, Yuqing |
author_sort | Wang, Xing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Thoracolumbar burst fractures are a common traumatic vertebral fracture in the spine, and pedicle screw fixation has been widely performed as a safe and effective procedure. However, after the stabilization of the thoracolumbar burst fractures, whether or not to remove the pedicle screw implant remains controversial. This review aimed to assess the benefits and risks of pedicle screw instrument removal after fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods: Data sources, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Clinical trials.gov, were comprehensively searched. All types of human studies that reported the benefits and risks of implant removal after thoracolumbar burst fractures, were selected for inclusion. Clinical outcomes after implant removal were collected for further evaluation. Results: A total of 4051 papers were retrieved, of which 35 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, including four case reports, four case series, and 27 observational studies. The possible risks of pedicle screw removal after fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures include the progression of the kyphotic deformity and surgical complications (e.g., surgical site infection, neurovascular injury, worsening pain, revision surgery), while the potential benefits of pedicle screw removal mainly include improved segmental range of motion and alleviated pain and disability. Therefore, the potential benefits and possible risks should be weighed to support patient-specific clinical decision-making about the removal of pedicle screws after the successful fusion of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Conclusions: There was conflicting evidence regarding the benefits and harms of implant removal after successful fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures, and the current literature does not support the general recommendation for removal of the pedicle screw instruments, which may expose the patients to unnecessary complications and costs. Both surgeons and patients should be aware of the indications and have appropriate expectations of the benefits and risks of implant removal. The decision to remove the implant or not should be made individually and cautiously by the surgeon in consultation with the patient. Further studies are warranted to clarify this issue. Level of evidence: level 1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10057639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100576392023-03-30 The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review Wang, Xing Wu, Xiang-Dong Zhang, Yanbin Zhu, Zhenglin Jiang, Jile Li, Guanqing Liu, Jiacheng Shao, Jiashen Sun, Yuqing J Clin Med Systematic Review Background: Thoracolumbar burst fractures are a common traumatic vertebral fracture in the spine, and pedicle screw fixation has been widely performed as a safe and effective procedure. However, after the stabilization of the thoracolumbar burst fractures, whether or not to remove the pedicle screw implant remains controversial. This review aimed to assess the benefits and risks of pedicle screw instrument removal after fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods: Data sources, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Clinical trials.gov, were comprehensively searched. All types of human studies that reported the benefits and risks of implant removal after thoracolumbar burst fractures, were selected for inclusion. Clinical outcomes after implant removal were collected for further evaluation. Results: A total of 4051 papers were retrieved, of which 35 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, including four case reports, four case series, and 27 observational studies. The possible risks of pedicle screw removal after fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures include the progression of the kyphotic deformity and surgical complications (e.g., surgical site infection, neurovascular injury, worsening pain, revision surgery), while the potential benefits of pedicle screw removal mainly include improved segmental range of motion and alleviated pain and disability. Therefore, the potential benefits and possible risks should be weighed to support patient-specific clinical decision-making about the removal of pedicle screws after the successful fusion of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Conclusions: There was conflicting evidence regarding the benefits and harms of implant removal after successful fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures, and the current literature does not support the general recommendation for removal of the pedicle screw instruments, which may expose the patients to unnecessary complications and costs. Both surgeons and patients should be aware of the indications and have appropriate expectations of the benefits and risks of implant removal. The decision to remove the implant or not should be made individually and cautiously by the surgeon in consultation with the patient. Further studies are warranted to clarify this issue. Level of evidence: level 1. MDPI 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10057639/ /pubmed/36983216 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062213 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Wang, Xing Wu, Xiang-Dong Zhang, Yanbin Zhu, Zhenglin Jiang, Jile Li, Guanqing Liu, Jiacheng Shao, Jiashen Sun, Yuqing The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review |
title | The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review |
title_sort | necessity of implant removal after fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures—a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10057639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983216 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxing thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT wuxiangdong thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT zhangyanbin thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT zhuzhenglin thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT jiangjile thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT liguanqing thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT liujiacheng thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT shaojiashen thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT sunyuqing thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT wangxing necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT wuxiangdong necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT zhangyanbin necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT zhuzhenglin necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT jiangjile necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT liguanqing necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT liujiacheng necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT shaojiashen necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview AT sunyuqing necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview |