Cargando…

The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review

Background: Thoracolumbar burst fractures are a common traumatic vertebral fracture in the spine, and pedicle screw fixation has been widely performed as a safe and effective procedure. However, after the stabilization of the thoracolumbar burst fractures, whether or not to remove the pedicle screw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xing, Wu, Xiang-Dong, Zhang, Yanbin, Zhu, Zhenglin, Jiang, Jile, Li, Guanqing, Liu, Jiacheng, Shao, Jiashen, Sun, Yuqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10057639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983216
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062213
_version_ 1785016418580824064
author Wang, Xing
Wu, Xiang-Dong
Zhang, Yanbin
Zhu, Zhenglin
Jiang, Jile
Li, Guanqing
Liu, Jiacheng
Shao, Jiashen
Sun, Yuqing
author_facet Wang, Xing
Wu, Xiang-Dong
Zhang, Yanbin
Zhu, Zhenglin
Jiang, Jile
Li, Guanqing
Liu, Jiacheng
Shao, Jiashen
Sun, Yuqing
author_sort Wang, Xing
collection PubMed
description Background: Thoracolumbar burst fractures are a common traumatic vertebral fracture in the spine, and pedicle screw fixation has been widely performed as a safe and effective procedure. However, after the stabilization of the thoracolumbar burst fractures, whether or not to remove the pedicle screw implant remains controversial. This review aimed to assess the benefits and risks of pedicle screw instrument removal after fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods: Data sources, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Clinical trials.gov, were comprehensively searched. All types of human studies that reported the benefits and risks of implant removal after thoracolumbar burst fractures, were selected for inclusion. Clinical outcomes after implant removal were collected for further evaluation. Results: A total of 4051 papers were retrieved, of which 35 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, including four case reports, four case series, and 27 observational studies. The possible risks of pedicle screw removal after fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures include the progression of the kyphotic deformity and surgical complications (e.g., surgical site infection, neurovascular injury, worsening pain, revision surgery), while the potential benefits of pedicle screw removal mainly include improved segmental range of motion and alleviated pain and disability. Therefore, the potential benefits and possible risks should be weighed to support patient-specific clinical decision-making about the removal of pedicle screws after the successful fusion of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Conclusions: There was conflicting evidence regarding the benefits and harms of implant removal after successful fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures, and the current literature does not support the general recommendation for removal of the pedicle screw instruments, which may expose the patients to unnecessary complications and costs. Both surgeons and patients should be aware of the indications and have appropriate expectations of the benefits and risks of implant removal. The decision to remove the implant or not should be made individually and cautiously by the surgeon in consultation with the patient. Further studies are warranted to clarify this issue. Level of evidence: level 1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10057639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100576392023-03-30 The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review Wang, Xing Wu, Xiang-Dong Zhang, Yanbin Zhu, Zhenglin Jiang, Jile Li, Guanqing Liu, Jiacheng Shao, Jiashen Sun, Yuqing J Clin Med Systematic Review Background: Thoracolumbar burst fractures are a common traumatic vertebral fracture in the spine, and pedicle screw fixation has been widely performed as a safe and effective procedure. However, after the stabilization of the thoracolumbar burst fractures, whether or not to remove the pedicle screw implant remains controversial. This review aimed to assess the benefits and risks of pedicle screw instrument removal after fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods: Data sources, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Clinical trials.gov, were comprehensively searched. All types of human studies that reported the benefits and risks of implant removal after thoracolumbar burst fractures, were selected for inclusion. Clinical outcomes after implant removal were collected for further evaluation. Results: A total of 4051 papers were retrieved, of which 35 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, including four case reports, four case series, and 27 observational studies. The possible risks of pedicle screw removal after fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures include the progression of the kyphotic deformity and surgical complications (e.g., surgical site infection, neurovascular injury, worsening pain, revision surgery), while the potential benefits of pedicle screw removal mainly include improved segmental range of motion and alleviated pain and disability. Therefore, the potential benefits and possible risks should be weighed to support patient-specific clinical decision-making about the removal of pedicle screws after the successful fusion of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Conclusions: There was conflicting evidence regarding the benefits and harms of implant removal after successful fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures, and the current literature does not support the general recommendation for removal of the pedicle screw instruments, which may expose the patients to unnecessary complications and costs. Both surgeons and patients should be aware of the indications and have appropriate expectations of the benefits and risks of implant removal. The decision to remove the implant or not should be made individually and cautiously by the surgeon in consultation with the patient. Further studies are warranted to clarify this issue. Level of evidence: level 1. MDPI 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10057639/ /pubmed/36983216 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062213 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Wang, Xing
Wu, Xiang-Dong
Zhang, Yanbin
Zhu, Zhenglin
Jiang, Jile
Li, Guanqing
Liu, Jiacheng
Shao, Jiashen
Sun, Yuqing
The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review
title The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review
title_full The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review
title_short The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures—A Systematic Review
title_sort necessity of implant removal after fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures—a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10057639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983216
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062213
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxing thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT wuxiangdong thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT zhangyanbin thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT zhuzhenglin thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT jiangjile thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT liguanqing thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT liujiacheng thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT shaojiashen thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT sunyuqing thenecessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT wangxing necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT wuxiangdong necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT zhangyanbin necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT zhuzhenglin necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT jiangjile necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT liguanqing necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT liujiacheng necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT shaojiashen necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview
AT sunyuqing necessityofimplantremovalafterfixationofthoracolumbarburstfracturesasystematicreview