Cargando…

The sizes of life

Recent research has revealed the diversity and biomass of life across ecosystems, but how that biomass is distributed across body sizes of all living things remains unclear. We compile the present-day global body size-biomass spectra for the terrestrial, marine, and subterranean realms. To achieve t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tekwa, Eden W., Catalano, Katrina A., Bazzicalupo, Anna L., O’Connor, Mary I., Pinsky, Malin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10057745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36989258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283020
_version_ 1785016446784372736
author Tekwa, Eden W.
Catalano, Katrina A.
Bazzicalupo, Anna L.
O’Connor, Mary I.
Pinsky, Malin L.
author_facet Tekwa, Eden W.
Catalano, Katrina A.
Bazzicalupo, Anna L.
O’Connor, Mary I.
Pinsky, Malin L.
author_sort Tekwa, Eden W.
collection PubMed
description Recent research has revealed the diversity and biomass of life across ecosystems, but how that biomass is distributed across body sizes of all living things remains unclear. We compile the present-day global body size-biomass spectra for the terrestrial, marine, and subterranean realms. To achieve this compilation, we pair existing and updated biomass estimates with previously uncatalogued body size ranges across all free-living biological groups. These data show that many biological groups share similar ranges of body sizes, and no single group dominates size ranges where cumulative biomass is highest. We then propagate biomass and size uncertainties and provide statistical descriptions of body size-biomass spectra across and within major habitat realms. Power laws show exponentially decreasing abundance (exponent -0.9±0.02 S.D., R(2) = 0.97) and nearly equal biomass (exponent 0.09±0.01, R(2) = 0.56) across log size bins, which resemble previous aquatic size spectra results but with greater organismal inclusivity and global coverage. In contrast, a bimodal Gaussian mixture model describes the biomass pattern better (R(2) = 0.86) and suggests small (~10(−15) g) and large (~10(7) g) organisms outweigh other sizes by one order magnitude (15 and 65 Gt versus ~1 Gt per log size). The results suggest that the global body size-biomass relationships is bimodal, but substantial one-to-two orders-of-magnitude uncertainty mean that additional data will be needed to clarify whether global-scale universal constraints or local forces shape these patterns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10057745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100577452023-03-30 The sizes of life Tekwa, Eden W. Catalano, Katrina A. Bazzicalupo, Anna L. O’Connor, Mary I. Pinsky, Malin L. PLoS One Research Article Recent research has revealed the diversity and biomass of life across ecosystems, but how that biomass is distributed across body sizes of all living things remains unclear. We compile the present-day global body size-biomass spectra for the terrestrial, marine, and subterranean realms. To achieve this compilation, we pair existing and updated biomass estimates with previously uncatalogued body size ranges across all free-living biological groups. These data show that many biological groups share similar ranges of body sizes, and no single group dominates size ranges where cumulative biomass is highest. We then propagate biomass and size uncertainties and provide statistical descriptions of body size-biomass spectra across and within major habitat realms. Power laws show exponentially decreasing abundance (exponent -0.9±0.02 S.D., R(2) = 0.97) and nearly equal biomass (exponent 0.09±0.01, R(2) = 0.56) across log size bins, which resemble previous aquatic size spectra results but with greater organismal inclusivity and global coverage. In contrast, a bimodal Gaussian mixture model describes the biomass pattern better (R(2) = 0.86) and suggests small (~10(−15) g) and large (~10(7) g) organisms outweigh other sizes by one order magnitude (15 and 65 Gt versus ~1 Gt per log size). The results suggest that the global body size-biomass relationships is bimodal, but substantial one-to-two orders-of-magnitude uncertainty mean that additional data will be needed to clarify whether global-scale universal constraints or local forces shape these patterns. Public Library of Science 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10057745/ /pubmed/36989258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283020 Text en © 2023 Tekwa et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tekwa, Eden W.
Catalano, Katrina A.
Bazzicalupo, Anna L.
O’Connor, Mary I.
Pinsky, Malin L.
The sizes of life
title The sizes of life
title_full The sizes of life
title_fullStr The sizes of life
title_full_unstemmed The sizes of life
title_short The sizes of life
title_sort sizes of life
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10057745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36989258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283020
work_keys_str_mv AT tekwaedenw thesizesoflife
AT catalanokatrinaa thesizesoflife
AT bazzicalupoannal thesizesoflife
AT oconnormaryi thesizesoflife
AT pinskymalinl thesizesoflife
AT tekwaedenw sizesoflife
AT catalanokatrinaa sizesoflife
AT bazzicalupoannal sizesoflife
AT oconnormaryi sizesoflife
AT pinskymalinl sizesoflife