Cargando…

Feasibility of Seated Stepping and Handshaking as a Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: A Pilot Study

Cardiopulmonary function is usually assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) using a cycle ergometer (CE-CPX) or a treadmill, which is difficult in patients with lower extremity motor dysfunction. A stepping and handshaking (SHS) exercise has been developed that can be performed safely and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imashiro, Kyosuke, Nishioka, Yasuko, Teramura, Kenzo, Hashimoto, Hiromi, Kimura, Hiroki, Tanabe, Naoya, Taniguchi, Yasuhiro, Nakai, Koya, Umemoto, Yasunori, Ito, Tomoyuki, Tajima, Fumihiro, Mikami, Yasuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10057871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983144
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062140
Descripción
Sumario:Cardiopulmonary function is usually assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) using a cycle ergometer (CE-CPX) or a treadmill, which is difficult in patients with lower extremity motor dysfunction. A stepping and handshaking (SHS) exercise has been developed that can be performed safely and easily while sitting on a chair. This study compared peak oxygen uptake (peak [Formula: see text]) between CE-CPX and SHS-CPX in healthy adults and investigated the safety and validity of SHS-CPX. Twenty young adults (mean age 27.8 ± 4.4 years) were randomly assigned to perform CE-CPX or SHS-CPX, with the other test to follow 1–2 weeks later. The peak [Formula: see text] , respiratory exchange ratio (RER), peak heart rate, blood pressure, and test completion time were compared between CE-CPX and SHS-CPX. All subjects completed the examination and met the criteria for peak [Formula: see text]. SHS-CPX and CE-CPX showed a strong correlation with peak [Formula: see text] (r = 0.85, p < 0.0001). The peak [Formula: see text] (40.4 ± 11.3 mL/min/kg vs. 28.9 ± 8.0 mL/min/kg), peak heart rate (190.6 ± 8.9 bpm vs. 172.1 ± 12.6 bpm), and test completion time (1052.8 ± 143.7 s vs. 609.1 ± 96.2 s) were significantly lower in the SHS-CPX (p < 0.0001). There were no adverse events. The peak [Formula: see text] with SHS-CPX was equivalent to about 70% of that with CE-CPX despite the exercise being performed in a sitting position, suggesting its suitability as a submaximal exercise test.