Cargando…

A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department

Introduction Both non-contrast Computed Tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) are used for the diagnosis of renal colic in the emergency department (ED). Although US reduces radiation exposure, its diagnostic accuracy is inferior to that of CT. In this context, data regarding the cost and organization...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kepka, Sabrina, Zarca, Kevin, Ohana, Mickaël, Hoffmann, Anne, Muller, Joris, Le Borgne, Pierrick, Andrès, Emmanuel, Bilbault, Pascal, Durand Zaleski, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984476
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030475
_version_ 1785016517667061760
author Kepka, Sabrina
Zarca, Kevin
Ohana, Mickaël
Hoffmann, Anne
Muller, Joris
Le Borgne, Pierrick
Andrès, Emmanuel
Bilbault, Pascal
Durand Zaleski, Isabelle
author_facet Kepka, Sabrina
Zarca, Kevin
Ohana, Mickaël
Hoffmann, Anne
Muller, Joris
Le Borgne, Pierrick
Andrès, Emmanuel
Bilbault, Pascal
Durand Zaleski, Isabelle
author_sort Kepka, Sabrina
collection PubMed
description Introduction Both non-contrast Computed Tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) are used for the diagnosis of renal colic in the emergency department (ED). Although US reduces radiation exposure, its diagnostic accuracy is inferior to that of CT. In this context, data regarding the cost and organizational impact of these strategies represent essential elements in the choice of imaging; however, they remain poorly documented. Aim of the study The aim of this study was to compare the costs and effectiveness of diagnostic workup by US and CT for patients consulting with renal colic in the ED. Methods We conducted a monocentric real-life retrospective study of patients consulting for a renal colic in an ED between 1 July 2018 and 31 December 2018. We estimated length of stay (LOS), total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, and initial and repeat admissions. Patients with initial US in the ED were compared to patients with initial CT using inverse probability weighting of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters, and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference in costs by the difference in LOS. The variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping. Results In this study, of the 273 patients included, 67 were patients assessed with US and 206 with CT. The average costs were €1159 (SD 1987) and €956 (SD 1462) for US and CT, respectively, and the ED LOS was 8.9 [CI 95% 8.1; 9.4] and 8.7 [CI 95% 7.9; 9.9] hours for US and CT, respectively. CT was associated with a decreased LOS by 0.139 [CI 95% −1.1; 1.5] hours and was cost-saving, with a €199 [CI 95% −745; 285] reduction per patient. Conclusion When imaging is required in the ED for suspected renal colic as recommended, there is real-life evidence that CT is a cost-effective strategy compared to US, reducing costs and LOS in the ED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10058030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100580302023-03-30 A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department Kepka, Sabrina Zarca, Kevin Ohana, Mickaël Hoffmann, Anne Muller, Joris Le Borgne, Pierrick Andrès, Emmanuel Bilbault, Pascal Durand Zaleski, Isabelle Medicina (Kaunas) Article Introduction Both non-contrast Computed Tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) are used for the diagnosis of renal colic in the emergency department (ED). Although US reduces radiation exposure, its diagnostic accuracy is inferior to that of CT. In this context, data regarding the cost and organizational impact of these strategies represent essential elements in the choice of imaging; however, they remain poorly documented. Aim of the study The aim of this study was to compare the costs and effectiveness of diagnostic workup by US and CT for patients consulting with renal colic in the ED. Methods We conducted a monocentric real-life retrospective study of patients consulting for a renal colic in an ED between 1 July 2018 and 31 December 2018. We estimated length of stay (LOS), total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, and initial and repeat admissions. Patients with initial US in the ED were compared to patients with initial CT using inverse probability weighting of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters, and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference in costs by the difference in LOS. The variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping. Results In this study, of the 273 patients included, 67 were patients assessed with US and 206 with CT. The average costs were €1159 (SD 1987) and €956 (SD 1462) for US and CT, respectively, and the ED LOS was 8.9 [CI 95% 8.1; 9.4] and 8.7 [CI 95% 7.9; 9.9] hours for US and CT, respectively. CT was associated with a decreased LOS by 0.139 [CI 95% −1.1; 1.5] hours and was cost-saving, with a €199 [CI 95% −745; 285] reduction per patient. Conclusion When imaging is required in the ED for suspected renal colic as recommended, there is real-life evidence that CT is a cost-effective strategy compared to US, reducing costs and LOS in the ED. MDPI 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10058030/ /pubmed/36984476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030475 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kepka, Sabrina
Zarca, Kevin
Ohana, Mickaël
Hoffmann, Anne
Muller, Joris
Le Borgne, Pierrick
Andrès, Emmanuel
Bilbault, Pascal
Durand Zaleski, Isabelle
A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department
title A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department
title_full A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department
title_short A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department
title_sort real-world cost-effectiveness study evaluating imaging strategies for the diagnostic workup of renal colic in the emergency department
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984476
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030475
work_keys_str_mv AT kepkasabrina arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT zarcakevin arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT ohanamickael arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT hoffmannanne arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT mullerjoris arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT leborgnepierrick arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT andresemmanuel arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT bilbaultpascal arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT durandzaleskiisabelle arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT kepkasabrina realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT zarcakevin realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT ohanamickael realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT hoffmannanne realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT mullerjoris realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT leborgnepierrick realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT andresemmanuel realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT bilbaultpascal realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment
AT durandzaleskiisabelle realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment