Cargando…
A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department
Introduction Both non-contrast Computed Tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) are used for the diagnosis of renal colic in the emergency department (ED). Although US reduces radiation exposure, its diagnostic accuracy is inferior to that of CT. In this context, data regarding the cost and organization...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030475 |
_version_ | 1785016517667061760 |
---|---|
author | Kepka, Sabrina Zarca, Kevin Ohana, Mickaël Hoffmann, Anne Muller, Joris Le Borgne, Pierrick Andrès, Emmanuel Bilbault, Pascal Durand Zaleski, Isabelle |
author_facet | Kepka, Sabrina Zarca, Kevin Ohana, Mickaël Hoffmann, Anne Muller, Joris Le Borgne, Pierrick Andrès, Emmanuel Bilbault, Pascal Durand Zaleski, Isabelle |
author_sort | Kepka, Sabrina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Both non-contrast Computed Tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) are used for the diagnosis of renal colic in the emergency department (ED). Although US reduces radiation exposure, its diagnostic accuracy is inferior to that of CT. In this context, data regarding the cost and organizational impact of these strategies represent essential elements in the choice of imaging; however, they remain poorly documented. Aim of the study The aim of this study was to compare the costs and effectiveness of diagnostic workup by US and CT for patients consulting with renal colic in the ED. Methods We conducted a monocentric real-life retrospective study of patients consulting for a renal colic in an ED between 1 July 2018 and 31 December 2018. We estimated length of stay (LOS), total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, and initial and repeat admissions. Patients with initial US in the ED were compared to patients with initial CT using inverse probability weighting of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters, and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference in costs by the difference in LOS. The variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping. Results In this study, of the 273 patients included, 67 were patients assessed with US and 206 with CT. The average costs were €1159 (SD 1987) and €956 (SD 1462) for US and CT, respectively, and the ED LOS was 8.9 [CI 95% 8.1; 9.4] and 8.7 [CI 95% 7.9; 9.9] hours for US and CT, respectively. CT was associated with a decreased LOS by 0.139 [CI 95% −1.1; 1.5] hours and was cost-saving, with a €199 [CI 95% −745; 285] reduction per patient. Conclusion When imaging is required in the ED for suspected renal colic as recommended, there is real-life evidence that CT is a cost-effective strategy compared to US, reducing costs and LOS in the ED. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10058030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100580302023-03-30 A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department Kepka, Sabrina Zarca, Kevin Ohana, Mickaël Hoffmann, Anne Muller, Joris Le Borgne, Pierrick Andrès, Emmanuel Bilbault, Pascal Durand Zaleski, Isabelle Medicina (Kaunas) Article Introduction Both non-contrast Computed Tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) are used for the diagnosis of renal colic in the emergency department (ED). Although US reduces radiation exposure, its diagnostic accuracy is inferior to that of CT. In this context, data regarding the cost and organizational impact of these strategies represent essential elements in the choice of imaging; however, they remain poorly documented. Aim of the study The aim of this study was to compare the costs and effectiveness of diagnostic workup by US and CT for patients consulting with renal colic in the ED. Methods We conducted a monocentric real-life retrospective study of patients consulting for a renal colic in an ED between 1 July 2018 and 31 December 2018. We estimated length of stay (LOS), total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, and initial and repeat admissions. Patients with initial US in the ED were compared to patients with initial CT using inverse probability weighting of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters, and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference in costs by the difference in LOS. The variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping. Results In this study, of the 273 patients included, 67 were patients assessed with US and 206 with CT. The average costs were €1159 (SD 1987) and €956 (SD 1462) for US and CT, respectively, and the ED LOS was 8.9 [CI 95% 8.1; 9.4] and 8.7 [CI 95% 7.9; 9.9] hours for US and CT, respectively. CT was associated with a decreased LOS by 0.139 [CI 95% −1.1; 1.5] hours and was cost-saving, with a €199 [CI 95% −745; 285] reduction per patient. Conclusion When imaging is required in the ED for suspected renal colic as recommended, there is real-life evidence that CT is a cost-effective strategy compared to US, reducing costs and LOS in the ED. MDPI 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10058030/ /pubmed/36984476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030475 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kepka, Sabrina Zarca, Kevin Ohana, Mickaël Hoffmann, Anne Muller, Joris Le Borgne, Pierrick Andrès, Emmanuel Bilbault, Pascal Durand Zaleski, Isabelle A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department |
title | A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department |
title_full | A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department |
title_fullStr | A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department |
title_full_unstemmed | A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department |
title_short | A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department |
title_sort | real-world cost-effectiveness study evaluating imaging strategies for the diagnostic workup of renal colic in the emergency department |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030475 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kepkasabrina arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT zarcakevin arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT ohanamickael arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT hoffmannanne arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT mullerjoris arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT leborgnepierrick arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT andresemmanuel arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT bilbaultpascal arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT durandzaleskiisabelle arealworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT kepkasabrina realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT zarcakevin realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT ohanamickael realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT hoffmannanne realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT mullerjoris realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT leborgnepierrick realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT andresemmanuel realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT bilbaultpascal realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment AT durandzaleskiisabelle realworldcosteffectivenessstudyevaluatingimagingstrategiesforthediagnosticworkupofrenalcolicintheemergencydepartment |