Cargando…

The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review

BACKGROUND: The value of continuity in primary care has been demonstrated for multiple positive outcomes. However, little is known about how the expansion of remote and digital care models in primary care have impacted continuity. AIM: To explore the impact of the expansion of remote and digital car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ladds, Emma, Khan, Maaedah, Moore, Lucy, Kalin, Asli, Greenhalgh, Trish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105731
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0398
_version_ 1785016560080912384
author Ladds, Emma
Khan, Maaedah
Moore, Lucy
Kalin, Asli
Greenhalgh, Trish
author_facet Ladds, Emma
Khan, Maaedah
Moore, Lucy
Kalin, Asli
Greenhalgh, Trish
author_sort Ladds, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The value of continuity in primary care has been demonstrated for multiple positive outcomes. However, little is known about how the expansion of remote and digital care models in primary care have impacted continuity. AIM: To explore the impact of the expansion of remote and digital care models on continuity in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic review of continuity in primary care. METHOD: A keyword search of Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases was used along with snowball sampling to identify relevant English-language qualitative and quantitative studies from any country between 2000 and 2022, which explored remote or digital approaches in primary care and continuity. Relevant data were extracted, analysed using GRADE-CERQual, and narratively synthesised. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in the review. The specific impact of remote approaches on continuity was rarely overtly addressed. Some patients expressed a preference for relational continuity depending on circumstance, problem, and context; others prioritised access. Clinicians valued continuity, with some viewing remote consultations more suitable where there was high episodic or relational continuity. With lower continuity, patients and clinicians considered remote consultations harder, higher risk, and poorer quality. Some evidence suggested that remote approaches and/or their implementation risked worsening inequalities and causing harm by reducing continuity where it was valuable. However, if deployed strategically and flexibly, remote approaches could improve continuity. CONCLUSION: While the value of continuity in primary care has previously been well demonstrated, the dearth of evidence around continuity in a remote and digital context is troubling. Further research is, therefore, needed to explore the links between the shift to remote care, continuity and equity, using real-world evaluation frameworks to ascertain when and for whom continuity adds most value, and how this can be enabled or maintained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10058181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100581812023-03-30 The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review Ladds, Emma Khan, Maaedah Moore, Lucy Kalin, Asli Greenhalgh, Trish Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: The value of continuity in primary care has been demonstrated for multiple positive outcomes. However, little is known about how the expansion of remote and digital care models in primary care have impacted continuity. AIM: To explore the impact of the expansion of remote and digital care models on continuity in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic review of continuity in primary care. METHOD: A keyword search of Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases was used along with snowball sampling to identify relevant English-language qualitative and quantitative studies from any country between 2000 and 2022, which explored remote or digital approaches in primary care and continuity. Relevant data were extracted, analysed using GRADE-CERQual, and narratively synthesised. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in the review. The specific impact of remote approaches on continuity was rarely overtly addressed. Some patients expressed a preference for relational continuity depending on circumstance, problem, and context; others prioritised access. Clinicians valued continuity, with some viewing remote consultations more suitable where there was high episodic or relational continuity. With lower continuity, patients and clinicians considered remote consultations harder, higher risk, and poorer quality. Some evidence suggested that remote approaches and/or their implementation risked worsening inequalities and causing harm by reducing continuity where it was valuable. However, if deployed strategically and flexibly, remote approaches could improve continuity. CONCLUSION: While the value of continuity in primary care has previously been well demonstrated, the dearth of evidence around continuity in a remote and digital context is troubling. Further research is, therefore, needed to explore the links between the shift to remote care, continuity and equity, using real-world evaluation frameworks to ascertain when and for whom continuity adds most value, and how this can be enabled or maintained. Royal College of General Practitioners 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10058181/ /pubmed/37105731 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0398 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Research
Ladds, Emma
Khan, Maaedah
Moore, Lucy
Kalin, Asli
Greenhalgh, Trish
The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review
title The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review
title_full The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review
title_fullStr The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review
title_short The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review
title_sort impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105731
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0398
work_keys_str_mv AT laddsemma theimpactofremotecareapproachesoncontinuityinprimarycareamixedstudiessystematicreview
AT khanmaaedah theimpactofremotecareapproachesoncontinuityinprimarycareamixedstudiessystematicreview
AT moorelucy theimpactofremotecareapproachesoncontinuityinprimarycareamixedstudiessystematicreview
AT kalinasli theimpactofremotecareapproachesoncontinuityinprimarycareamixedstudiessystematicreview
AT greenhalghtrish theimpactofremotecareapproachesoncontinuityinprimarycareamixedstudiessystematicreview
AT laddsemma impactofremotecareapproachesoncontinuityinprimarycareamixedstudiessystematicreview
AT khanmaaedah impactofremotecareapproachesoncontinuityinprimarycareamixedstudiessystematicreview
AT moorelucy impactofremotecareapproachesoncontinuityinprimarycareamixedstudiessystematicreview
AT kalinasli impactofremotecareapproachesoncontinuityinprimarycareamixedstudiessystematicreview
AT greenhalghtrish impactofremotecareapproachesoncontinuityinprimarycareamixedstudiessystematicreview