Cargando…

Comparison of Image Quality and Quantification Parameters between Q.Clear and OSEM Reconstruction Methods on FDG-PET/CT Images in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

We compared the image quality and quantification parameters through bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm (Q.Clear) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm for 2-[(18)F]FDG-PET/CT scans performed for response monitoring in patients with metastatic breast cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Naghavi-Behzad, Mohammad, Vogsen, Marianne, Gerke, Oke, Dahlsgaard-Wallenius, Sara Elisabeth, Nissen, Henriette Juel, Jakobsen, Nick Møldrup, Braad, Poul-Erik, Vilstrup, Mie Holm, Deak, Paul, Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe, Andersen, Thomas Lund
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	MDPI 2023
Materias:	Communication
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36976116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9030065

Ejemplares similares

2-[(18)F]FDG-PET/CT is a better predictor of survival than conventional CT: a prospective study of response monitoring in metastatic breast cancer
por: Vogsen, Marianne, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prognostic Value of Dual-Time-Point (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Exploratory Study of Quantitative Measures
por: Naghavi-Behzad, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Pattern of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT
por: Gram-Nielsen, Rosa, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

FDG-PET/CT for Response Monitoring in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Today, Tomorrow, and Beyond
por: Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

FDG-PET/CT for Response Monitoring in Metastatic Breast Cancer: The Feasibility and Benefits of Applying PERCIST
por: Vogsen, Marianne, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Interrater Agreement and Reliability of PERCIST and Visual Assessment When Using 18F-FDG-PET/CT for Response Monitoring of Metastatic Breast Cancer
por: Sørensen, Jonas S., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Group-sequential analysis may allow for early trial termination: illustration by an intra-observer repeatability study
por: Gerke, Oke, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Clinical Impact of FDG-PET/CT Compared with CE-CT in Response Monitoring of Metastatic Breast Cancer
por: Naghavi-Behzad, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cost-effectiveness of 2-[(18)F]FDG-PET/CT versus CE-CT for response monitoring in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a register-based comparative study
por: Naghavi-Behzad, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear®) in comparison with the OSEM reconstruction on low contrast PET hypoxic images
por: Texte, Edgar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

FDG-PET/CT Versus Contrast-Enhanced CT for Response Evaluation in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
por: Helland, Fredrik, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT in Cancer of Unknown Primary Tumor—A Retrospective Register-Based Cohort Study
por: Rimer, Heidi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Benefits and harms of implementing [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosing recurrent breast cancer: a prospective clinical study
por: Vogsen, Marianne, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prevalence of focal incidental breast uptake on FDG-PET/CT and risk of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Aarstad, Else Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Diagnosis of bone metastases in breast cancer: Lesion-based sensitivity of dual-time-point FDG-PET/CT compared to low-dose CT and bone scintigraphy
por: Hansen, Jeanette Ansholm, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Perspective of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer on Electronic Access to Scan Results: Mixed Methods Study
por: Baun, Christina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Value assessment of artificial intelligence in medical imaging: a scoping review
por: Fasterholdt, Iben, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Correction: Value assessment of artificial intelligence in medical imaging: a scoping review
por: Fasterholdt, Iben, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Learning from patient involvement in a clinical study analyzing PET/CT in women with advanced breast cancer
por: Vogsen, Marianne, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Higher Interrater Agreement of FDG-PET/CT than Bone Scintigraphy in Diagnosing Bone Recurrent Breast Cancer
por: Holm, Jorun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Optimization of Q.Clear reconstruction for dynamic (18)F PET imaging
por: Lysvik, Elisabeth Kirkeby, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol
por: Buch‐Olsen, Karen Middelbo, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Quantification of FDG-PET/CT with delayed imaging in patients with newly diagnosed recurrent breast cancer
por: Baun, Christina, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

How to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement with quantitative PET using variance component analysis: a proposal for standardisation
por: Gerke, Oke, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

3D-OSEM versus FORE + OSEM: Optimal Reconstruction Algorithm for FDG PET with a Short Acquisition Time
por: Tsuda, Keisuke, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Low-Dose Radiation to COVID-19 Patients to Ease the Disease Course and Reduce the Need of Intensive Care
por: Høilund-Carlsen, Poul Flemming, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Impact of the Q.Clear reconstruction algorithm on the interpretation of PET/CT images in patients with lymphoma
por: Wyrzykowski, Michał, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A prospective study on dual time (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in high-risk prostate cancer patients
por: Mortensen, Mike Allan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Optimization of OSEM parameters in myocardial perfusion imaging reconstruction as a function of body mass index: a clinical approach
por: de Barros, Pietro Paolo, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Atherosclerosis imaging with (18)F-sodium fluoride PET: state-of-the-art review
por: Høilund-Carlsen, Poul F., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

How to increase value and reduce waste in research: initial experiences of applying Lean thinking and visual management in research leadership
por: Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A LIST-MODE OSEM-BASED ATTENUATION AND SCATTER COMPENSATION METHOD FOR SPECT
por: Rahman, Md Ashequr, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

PET/CT without capacity limitations: a Danish experience from a European perspective
por: Høilund-Carlsen, Poul Flemming, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Impact of γ factor in the penalty function of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) to achieve high-resolution PET images
por: Miwa, Kenta, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Quantitative Image Quality Metrics of the Low-Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems
por: Abdi, Ahmed Jibril, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

NaF-PET Imaging of Atherosclerosis Burden
por: Høilund-Carlsen, Poul F., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) of (18)F-fluciclovine PET for imaging of recurrent prostate cancer: semi-quantitative and clinical evaluation
por: Teoh, Eugene J, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Atherosclerosis Imaging with (18)F-Sodium Fluoride PET
por: Høilund-Carlsen, Poul F., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Atherosclerosis Burdens in Diabetes Mellitus: Assessment by PET Imaging
por: Høilund-Carlsen, Poul F., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Non-isotropic noise correlation in PET data reconstructed by FBP but not by OSEM demonstrated using auto-correlation function
por: Razifar, Pasha, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_q2jn49iim710v7otm3csejfbu0