Cargando…
Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Background and Objectives: This study aims to evaluate artificial intelligence-calculated hepatorenal index (AI-HRI) as a diagnostic method for hepatic steatosis. Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 102 patients with clinically suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). All pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030469 |
_version_ | 1785016637671342080 |
---|---|
author | Zsombor, Zita Rónaszéki, Aladár D. Csongrády, Barbara Stollmayer, Róbert Budai, Bettina K. Folhoffer, Anikó Kalina, Ildikó Győri, Gabriella Bérczi, Viktor Maurovich-Horvat, Pál Hagymási, Krisztina Kaposi, Pál Novák |
author_facet | Zsombor, Zita Rónaszéki, Aladár D. Csongrády, Barbara Stollmayer, Róbert Budai, Bettina K. Folhoffer, Anikó Kalina, Ildikó Győri, Gabriella Bérczi, Viktor Maurovich-Horvat, Pál Hagymási, Krisztina Kaposi, Pál Novák |
author_sort | Zsombor, Zita |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: This study aims to evaluate artificial intelligence-calculated hepatorenal index (AI-HRI) as a diagnostic method for hepatic steatosis. Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 102 patients with clinically suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). All patients had a quantitative ultrasound (QUS), including AI-HRI, ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC,) and ultrasound backscatter-distribution coefficient (SC) measurements. The ultrasonographic fatty liver indicator (US-FLI) score was also calculated. The magnetic resonance imaging fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) was the reference to classify patients into four grades of steatosis: none < 5%, mild 5–10%, moderate 10–20%, and severe ≥ 20%. We compared AI-HRI between steatosis grades and calculated Spearman’s correlation (r(s)) between the methods. We determined the agreement between AI-HRI by two examiners using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 68 cases. We performed a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to estimate the area under the curve (AUC) for AI-HRI. Results: The mean AI-HRI was 2.27 (standard deviation, ±0.96) in the patient cohort. The AI-HRI was significantly different between groups without (1.480 ± 0.607, p < 0.003) and with mild steatosis (2.155 ± 0.776), as well as between mild and moderate steatosis (2.777 ± 0.923, p < 0.018). AI-HRI showed moderate correlation with AC (r(s) = 0.597), SC (r(s) = 0.473), US-FLI (r(s) = 0.5), and MRI-PDFF (r(s) = 0.528). The agreement in AI-HRI was good between the two examiners (ICC = 0.635, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.411–0.774, p < 0.001). The AI-HRI could detect mild steatosis (AUC = 0.758, 95% CI = 0.621–0.894) with fair and moderate/severe steatosis (AUC = 0.803, 95% CI = 0.721–0.885) with good accuracy. However, the performance of AI-HRI was not significantly different (p < 0.578) between the two diagnostic tasks. Conclusions: AI-HRI is an easy-to-use, reproducible, and accurate QUS method for diagnosing mild and moderate hepatic steatosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10058464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100584642023-03-30 Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Zsombor, Zita Rónaszéki, Aladár D. Csongrády, Barbara Stollmayer, Róbert Budai, Bettina K. Folhoffer, Anikó Kalina, Ildikó Győri, Gabriella Bérczi, Viktor Maurovich-Horvat, Pál Hagymási, Krisztina Kaposi, Pál Novák Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: This study aims to evaluate artificial intelligence-calculated hepatorenal index (AI-HRI) as a diagnostic method for hepatic steatosis. Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 102 patients with clinically suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). All patients had a quantitative ultrasound (QUS), including AI-HRI, ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC,) and ultrasound backscatter-distribution coefficient (SC) measurements. The ultrasonographic fatty liver indicator (US-FLI) score was also calculated. The magnetic resonance imaging fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) was the reference to classify patients into four grades of steatosis: none < 5%, mild 5–10%, moderate 10–20%, and severe ≥ 20%. We compared AI-HRI between steatosis grades and calculated Spearman’s correlation (r(s)) between the methods. We determined the agreement between AI-HRI by two examiners using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 68 cases. We performed a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to estimate the area under the curve (AUC) for AI-HRI. Results: The mean AI-HRI was 2.27 (standard deviation, ±0.96) in the patient cohort. The AI-HRI was significantly different between groups without (1.480 ± 0.607, p < 0.003) and with mild steatosis (2.155 ± 0.776), as well as between mild and moderate steatosis (2.777 ± 0.923, p < 0.018). AI-HRI showed moderate correlation with AC (r(s) = 0.597), SC (r(s) = 0.473), US-FLI (r(s) = 0.5), and MRI-PDFF (r(s) = 0.528). The agreement in AI-HRI was good between the two examiners (ICC = 0.635, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.411–0.774, p < 0.001). The AI-HRI could detect mild steatosis (AUC = 0.758, 95% CI = 0.621–0.894) with fair and moderate/severe steatosis (AUC = 0.803, 95% CI = 0.721–0.885) with good accuracy. However, the performance of AI-HRI was not significantly different (p < 0.578) between the two diagnostic tasks. Conclusions: AI-HRI is an easy-to-use, reproducible, and accurate QUS method for diagnosing mild and moderate hepatic steatosis. MDPI 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10058464/ /pubmed/36984470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030469 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zsombor, Zita Rónaszéki, Aladár D. Csongrády, Barbara Stollmayer, Róbert Budai, Bettina K. Folhoffer, Anikó Kalina, Ildikó Győri, Gabriella Bérczi, Viktor Maurovich-Horvat, Pál Hagymási, Krisztina Kaposi, Pál Novák Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease |
title | Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease |
title_full | Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease |
title_short | Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease |
title_sort | evaluation of artificial intelligence-calculated hepatorenal index for diagnosing mild and moderate hepatic steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030469 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zsomborzita evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease AT ronaszekialadard evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease AT csongradybarbara evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease AT stollmayerrobert evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease AT budaibettinak evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease AT folhofferaniko evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease AT kalinaildiko evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease AT gyorigabriella evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease AT bercziviktor evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease AT maurovichhorvatpal evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease AT hagymasikrisztina evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease AT kaposipalnovak evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease |