Cargando…

Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Background and Objectives: This study aims to evaluate artificial intelligence-calculated hepatorenal index (AI-HRI) as a diagnostic method for hepatic steatosis. Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 102 patients with clinically suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). All pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zsombor, Zita, Rónaszéki, Aladár D., Csongrády, Barbara, Stollmayer, Róbert, Budai, Bettina K., Folhoffer, Anikó, Kalina, Ildikó, Győri, Gabriella, Bérczi, Viktor, Maurovich-Horvat, Pál, Hagymási, Krisztina, Kaposi, Pál Novák
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030469
_version_ 1785016637671342080
author Zsombor, Zita
Rónaszéki, Aladár D.
Csongrády, Barbara
Stollmayer, Róbert
Budai, Bettina K.
Folhoffer, Anikó
Kalina, Ildikó
Győri, Gabriella
Bérczi, Viktor
Maurovich-Horvat, Pál
Hagymási, Krisztina
Kaposi, Pál Novák
author_facet Zsombor, Zita
Rónaszéki, Aladár D.
Csongrády, Barbara
Stollmayer, Róbert
Budai, Bettina K.
Folhoffer, Anikó
Kalina, Ildikó
Győri, Gabriella
Bérczi, Viktor
Maurovich-Horvat, Pál
Hagymási, Krisztina
Kaposi, Pál Novák
author_sort Zsombor, Zita
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: This study aims to evaluate artificial intelligence-calculated hepatorenal index (AI-HRI) as a diagnostic method for hepatic steatosis. Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 102 patients with clinically suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). All patients had a quantitative ultrasound (QUS), including AI-HRI, ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC,) and ultrasound backscatter-distribution coefficient (SC) measurements. The ultrasonographic fatty liver indicator (US-FLI) score was also calculated. The magnetic resonance imaging fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) was the reference to classify patients into four grades of steatosis: none < 5%, mild 5–10%, moderate 10–20%, and severe ≥ 20%. We compared AI-HRI between steatosis grades and calculated Spearman’s correlation (r(s)) between the methods. We determined the agreement between AI-HRI by two examiners using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 68 cases. We performed a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to estimate the area under the curve (AUC) for AI-HRI. Results: The mean AI-HRI was 2.27 (standard deviation, ±0.96) in the patient cohort. The AI-HRI was significantly different between groups without (1.480 ± 0.607, p < 0.003) and with mild steatosis (2.155 ± 0.776), as well as between mild and moderate steatosis (2.777 ± 0.923, p < 0.018). AI-HRI showed moderate correlation with AC (r(s) = 0.597), SC (r(s) = 0.473), US-FLI (r(s) = 0.5), and MRI-PDFF (r(s) = 0.528). The agreement in AI-HRI was good between the two examiners (ICC = 0.635, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.411–0.774, p < 0.001). The AI-HRI could detect mild steatosis (AUC = 0.758, 95% CI = 0.621–0.894) with fair and moderate/severe steatosis (AUC = 0.803, 95% CI = 0.721–0.885) with good accuracy. However, the performance of AI-HRI was not significantly different (p < 0.578) between the two diagnostic tasks. Conclusions: AI-HRI is an easy-to-use, reproducible, and accurate QUS method for diagnosing mild and moderate hepatic steatosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10058464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100584642023-03-30 Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Zsombor, Zita Rónaszéki, Aladár D. Csongrády, Barbara Stollmayer, Róbert Budai, Bettina K. Folhoffer, Anikó Kalina, Ildikó Győri, Gabriella Bérczi, Viktor Maurovich-Horvat, Pál Hagymási, Krisztina Kaposi, Pál Novák Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: This study aims to evaluate artificial intelligence-calculated hepatorenal index (AI-HRI) as a diagnostic method for hepatic steatosis. Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 102 patients with clinically suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). All patients had a quantitative ultrasound (QUS), including AI-HRI, ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC,) and ultrasound backscatter-distribution coefficient (SC) measurements. The ultrasonographic fatty liver indicator (US-FLI) score was also calculated. The magnetic resonance imaging fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) was the reference to classify patients into four grades of steatosis: none < 5%, mild 5–10%, moderate 10–20%, and severe ≥ 20%. We compared AI-HRI between steatosis grades and calculated Spearman’s correlation (r(s)) between the methods. We determined the agreement between AI-HRI by two examiners using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 68 cases. We performed a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to estimate the area under the curve (AUC) for AI-HRI. Results: The mean AI-HRI was 2.27 (standard deviation, ±0.96) in the patient cohort. The AI-HRI was significantly different between groups without (1.480 ± 0.607, p < 0.003) and with mild steatosis (2.155 ± 0.776), as well as between mild and moderate steatosis (2.777 ± 0.923, p < 0.018). AI-HRI showed moderate correlation with AC (r(s) = 0.597), SC (r(s) = 0.473), US-FLI (r(s) = 0.5), and MRI-PDFF (r(s) = 0.528). The agreement in AI-HRI was good between the two examiners (ICC = 0.635, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.411–0.774, p < 0.001). The AI-HRI could detect mild steatosis (AUC = 0.758, 95% CI = 0.621–0.894) with fair and moderate/severe steatosis (AUC = 0.803, 95% CI = 0.721–0.885) with good accuracy. However, the performance of AI-HRI was not significantly different (p < 0.578) between the two diagnostic tasks. Conclusions: AI-HRI is an easy-to-use, reproducible, and accurate QUS method for diagnosing mild and moderate hepatic steatosis. MDPI 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10058464/ /pubmed/36984470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030469 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zsombor, Zita
Rónaszéki, Aladár D.
Csongrády, Barbara
Stollmayer, Róbert
Budai, Bettina K.
Folhoffer, Anikó
Kalina, Ildikó
Győri, Gabriella
Bérczi, Viktor
Maurovich-Horvat, Pál
Hagymási, Krisztina
Kaposi, Pál Novák
Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
title Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
title_full Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
title_fullStr Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
title_short Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
title_sort evaluation of artificial intelligence-calculated hepatorenal index for diagnosing mild and moderate hepatic steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030469
work_keys_str_mv AT zsomborzita evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT ronaszekialadard evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT csongradybarbara evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT stollmayerrobert evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT budaibettinak evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT folhofferaniko evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT kalinaildiko evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT gyorigabriella evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT bercziviktor evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT maurovichhorvatpal evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT hagymasikrisztina evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT kaposipalnovak evaluationofartificialintelligencecalculatedhepatorenalindexfordiagnosingmildandmoderatehepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease