Cargando…

Clinically Relevant Properties of 3D Printable Materials for Intraoral Use in Orthodontics: A Critical Review of the Literature

The review aimed at analyzing the evidence available on 3D printable materials and techniques used for the fabrication of orthodontic appliances, focusing on materials properties that are clinically relevant. MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Starting from an init...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goracci, Cecilia, Juloski, Jovana, D’Amico, Claudio, Balestra, Dario, Volpe, Alessandra, Juloski, Jelena, Vichi, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062166
_version_ 1785016702639013888
author Goracci, Cecilia
Juloski, Jovana
D’Amico, Claudio
Balestra, Dario
Volpe, Alessandra
Juloski, Jelena
Vichi, Alessandro
author_facet Goracci, Cecilia
Juloski, Jovana
D’Amico, Claudio
Balestra, Dario
Volpe, Alessandra
Juloski, Jelena
Vichi, Alessandro
author_sort Goracci, Cecilia
collection PubMed
description The review aimed at analyzing the evidence available on 3D printable materials and techniques used for the fabrication of orthodontic appliances, focusing on materials properties that are clinically relevant. MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Starting from an initial retrieval of 669 citations, 47 articles were finally included in the qualitative review. Several articles presented proof-of-concept clinical cases describing the digital workflow to manufacture a variety of appliances. Clinical studies other than these case reports are not available. The fabrication of aligners is the most investigated application of 3D printing in orthodontics, and, among materials, Dental LT Clear Resin (Formlabs) has been tested in several studies, although Tera Harz TC-85 (Graphy) is currently the only material specifically marketed for direct printing of aligners. Tests of the mechanical properties of aligners materials lacked homogeneity in the protocols, while biocompatibility tests failed to assess the influence of intraoral conditions on eluents release. The aesthetic properties of 3D-printed appliances are largely unexplored. The evidence on 3D-printed metallic appliances is also limited. The scientific evidence on 3D printable orthodontic materials and techniques should be strengthened by defining international standards for laboratory testing and by starting the necessary clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10058724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100587242023-03-30 Clinically Relevant Properties of 3D Printable Materials for Intraoral Use in Orthodontics: A Critical Review of the Literature Goracci, Cecilia Juloski, Jovana D’Amico, Claudio Balestra, Dario Volpe, Alessandra Juloski, Jelena Vichi, Alessandro Materials (Basel) Review The review aimed at analyzing the evidence available on 3D printable materials and techniques used for the fabrication of orthodontic appliances, focusing on materials properties that are clinically relevant. MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Starting from an initial retrieval of 669 citations, 47 articles were finally included in the qualitative review. Several articles presented proof-of-concept clinical cases describing the digital workflow to manufacture a variety of appliances. Clinical studies other than these case reports are not available. The fabrication of aligners is the most investigated application of 3D printing in orthodontics, and, among materials, Dental LT Clear Resin (Formlabs) has been tested in several studies, although Tera Harz TC-85 (Graphy) is currently the only material specifically marketed for direct printing of aligners. Tests of the mechanical properties of aligners materials lacked homogeneity in the protocols, while biocompatibility tests failed to assess the influence of intraoral conditions on eluents release. The aesthetic properties of 3D-printed appliances are largely unexplored. The evidence on 3D-printed metallic appliances is also limited. The scientific evidence on 3D printable orthodontic materials and techniques should be strengthened by defining international standards for laboratory testing and by starting the necessary clinical trials. MDPI 2023-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10058724/ /pubmed/36984045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062166 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Goracci, Cecilia
Juloski, Jovana
D’Amico, Claudio
Balestra, Dario
Volpe, Alessandra
Juloski, Jelena
Vichi, Alessandro
Clinically Relevant Properties of 3D Printable Materials for Intraoral Use in Orthodontics: A Critical Review of the Literature
title Clinically Relevant Properties of 3D Printable Materials for Intraoral Use in Orthodontics: A Critical Review of the Literature
title_full Clinically Relevant Properties of 3D Printable Materials for Intraoral Use in Orthodontics: A Critical Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Clinically Relevant Properties of 3D Printable Materials for Intraoral Use in Orthodontics: A Critical Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Clinically Relevant Properties of 3D Printable Materials for Intraoral Use in Orthodontics: A Critical Review of the Literature
title_short Clinically Relevant Properties of 3D Printable Materials for Intraoral Use in Orthodontics: A Critical Review of the Literature
title_sort clinically relevant properties of 3d printable materials for intraoral use in orthodontics: a critical review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062166
work_keys_str_mv AT goraccicecilia clinicallyrelevantpropertiesof3dprintablematerialsforintraoraluseinorthodonticsacriticalreviewoftheliterature
AT juloskijovana clinicallyrelevantpropertiesof3dprintablematerialsforintraoraluseinorthodonticsacriticalreviewoftheliterature
AT damicoclaudio clinicallyrelevantpropertiesof3dprintablematerialsforintraoraluseinorthodonticsacriticalreviewoftheliterature
AT balestradario clinicallyrelevantpropertiesof3dprintablematerialsforintraoraluseinorthodonticsacriticalreviewoftheliterature
AT volpealessandra clinicallyrelevantpropertiesof3dprintablematerialsforintraoraluseinorthodonticsacriticalreviewoftheliterature
AT juloskijelena clinicallyrelevantpropertiesof3dprintablematerialsforintraoraluseinorthodonticsacriticalreviewoftheliterature
AT vichialessandro clinicallyrelevantpropertiesof3dprintablematerialsforintraoraluseinorthodonticsacriticalreviewoftheliterature