Cargando…

Enamel Evaluation after Debonding of Fixed Retention and Polishing Treatment with Three Different Methods

Lack of standardization of the retention phase has led to many studies of stability of movements and characteristic of retainers, disregarding the enamel repercussions of fixed retention on this phase. This study aimed to analyze different methods of enamel polishing after detachment of orthodontic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iglesias, Angelica, Flores, Teresa, Moyano, Javier, Artés, Montserrat, Botella, Nuria, Gil, Javier, Puigdollers, Andreu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984283
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062403
_version_ 1785016740317495296
author Iglesias, Angelica
Flores, Teresa
Moyano, Javier
Artés, Montserrat
Botella, Nuria
Gil, Javier
Puigdollers, Andreu
author_facet Iglesias, Angelica
Flores, Teresa
Moyano, Javier
Artés, Montserrat
Botella, Nuria
Gil, Javier
Puigdollers, Andreu
author_sort Iglesias, Angelica
collection PubMed
description Lack of standardization of the retention phase has led to many studies of stability of movements and characteristic of retainers, disregarding the enamel repercussions of fixed retention on this phase. This study aimed to analyze different methods of enamel polishing after detachment of orthodontic retainers. Forty-five healthy premolars were divided into three groups according to the polishing bur after debonding, and four specimens without intervention were used as control. A 0.038 × 0.015 inches gold chain was bonded between the premolars and then removed. The adhesive remnant was removed with three types of burs according to the study groups (Group 1: white stone at high speed; Group 2: high-speed handpiece with a 30-blade tungsten carbide bur; Group 3: low-speed handpiece and a 30-blade tungsten bur). After debonding and polishing, all samples were analyzed with a confocal microscopy on surface roughness parameters: Sa: Arithmetic mean of the height of the surface. Rq: Square mean of the height of the surface and Sz: Maximum surface height. Mechanical tests were carried out to determine the bonding stress of the retention adhered to the teeth using an electromechanical testing machine. The adhesion stress was 8.23 MPa (±0.87). The quality of the refinement of the enamel after debonding is essential in order to preserve its integrity. The use of the 30-blade tungsten carbide bur provides a smooth enamel surface after polishing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10058876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100588762023-03-30 Enamel Evaluation after Debonding of Fixed Retention and Polishing Treatment with Three Different Methods Iglesias, Angelica Flores, Teresa Moyano, Javier Artés, Montserrat Botella, Nuria Gil, Javier Puigdollers, Andreu Materials (Basel) Article Lack of standardization of the retention phase has led to many studies of stability of movements and characteristic of retainers, disregarding the enamel repercussions of fixed retention on this phase. This study aimed to analyze different methods of enamel polishing after detachment of orthodontic retainers. Forty-five healthy premolars were divided into three groups according to the polishing bur after debonding, and four specimens without intervention were used as control. A 0.038 × 0.015 inches gold chain was bonded between the premolars and then removed. The adhesive remnant was removed with three types of burs according to the study groups (Group 1: white stone at high speed; Group 2: high-speed handpiece with a 30-blade tungsten carbide bur; Group 3: low-speed handpiece and a 30-blade tungsten bur). After debonding and polishing, all samples were analyzed with a confocal microscopy on surface roughness parameters: Sa: Arithmetic mean of the height of the surface. Rq: Square mean of the height of the surface and Sz: Maximum surface height. Mechanical tests were carried out to determine the bonding stress of the retention adhered to the teeth using an electromechanical testing machine. The adhesion stress was 8.23 MPa (±0.87). The quality of the refinement of the enamel after debonding is essential in order to preserve its integrity. The use of the 30-blade tungsten carbide bur provides a smooth enamel surface after polishing. MDPI 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10058876/ /pubmed/36984283 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062403 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Iglesias, Angelica
Flores, Teresa
Moyano, Javier
Artés, Montserrat
Botella, Nuria
Gil, Javier
Puigdollers, Andreu
Enamel Evaluation after Debonding of Fixed Retention and Polishing Treatment with Three Different Methods
title Enamel Evaluation after Debonding of Fixed Retention and Polishing Treatment with Three Different Methods
title_full Enamel Evaluation after Debonding of Fixed Retention and Polishing Treatment with Three Different Methods
title_fullStr Enamel Evaluation after Debonding of Fixed Retention and Polishing Treatment with Three Different Methods
title_full_unstemmed Enamel Evaluation after Debonding of Fixed Retention and Polishing Treatment with Three Different Methods
title_short Enamel Evaluation after Debonding of Fixed Retention and Polishing Treatment with Three Different Methods
title_sort enamel evaluation after debonding of fixed retention and polishing treatment with three different methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984283
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062403
work_keys_str_mv AT iglesiasangelica enamelevaluationafterdebondingoffixedretentionandpolishingtreatmentwiththreedifferentmethods
AT floresteresa enamelevaluationafterdebondingoffixedretentionandpolishingtreatmentwiththreedifferentmethods
AT moyanojavier enamelevaluationafterdebondingoffixedretentionandpolishingtreatmentwiththreedifferentmethods
AT artesmontserrat enamelevaluationafterdebondingoffixedretentionandpolishingtreatmentwiththreedifferentmethods
AT botellanuria enamelevaluationafterdebondingoffixedretentionandpolishingtreatmentwiththreedifferentmethods
AT giljavier enamelevaluationafterdebondingoffixedretentionandpolishingtreatmentwiththreedifferentmethods
AT puigdollersandreu enamelevaluationafterdebondingoffixedretentionandpolishingtreatmentwiththreedifferentmethods