Cargando…
Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future
Sex and gender dimorphisms are found in a large variety of diseases, including sepsis and septic shock which are more prevalent in men than in women. Animal models show that the host response to pathogens differs in females and males. This difference is partially explained by sex polarization of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36985319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030746 |
_version_ | 1785016756555743232 |
---|---|
author | Lakbar, Ines Einav, Sharon Lalevée, Nathalie Martin-Loeches, Ignacio Pastene, Bruno Leone, Marc |
author_facet | Lakbar, Ines Einav, Sharon Lalevée, Nathalie Martin-Loeches, Ignacio Pastene, Bruno Leone, Marc |
author_sort | Lakbar, Ines |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sex and gender dimorphisms are found in a large variety of diseases, including sepsis and septic shock which are more prevalent in men than in women. Animal models show that the host response to pathogens differs in females and males. This difference is partially explained by sex polarization of the intracellular pathways responding to pathogen–cell receptor interactions. Sex hormones seem to be responsible for this polarization, although other factors, such as chromosomal effects, have yet to be investigated. In brief, females are less susceptible to sepsis and seem to recover more effectively than males. Clinical observations produce more nuanced findings, but men consistently have a higher incidence of sepsis, and some reports also claim higher mortality rates. However, variables other than hormonal differences complicate the interaction between sex and sepsis, including comorbidities as well as social and cultural differences between men and women. Conflicting data have also been reported regarding sepsis-attributable mortality rates among pregnant women, compared with non-pregnant females. We believe that unraveling sex differences in the host response to sepsis and its treatment could be the first step in personalized, phenotype-based management of patients with sepsis and septic shock. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10058943 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100589432023-03-30 Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future Lakbar, Ines Einav, Sharon Lalevée, Nathalie Martin-Loeches, Ignacio Pastene, Bruno Leone, Marc Microorganisms Review Sex and gender dimorphisms are found in a large variety of diseases, including sepsis and septic shock which are more prevalent in men than in women. Animal models show that the host response to pathogens differs in females and males. This difference is partially explained by sex polarization of the intracellular pathways responding to pathogen–cell receptor interactions. Sex hormones seem to be responsible for this polarization, although other factors, such as chromosomal effects, have yet to be investigated. In brief, females are less susceptible to sepsis and seem to recover more effectively than males. Clinical observations produce more nuanced findings, but men consistently have a higher incidence of sepsis, and some reports also claim higher mortality rates. However, variables other than hormonal differences complicate the interaction between sex and sepsis, including comorbidities as well as social and cultural differences between men and women. Conflicting data have also been reported regarding sepsis-attributable mortality rates among pregnant women, compared with non-pregnant females. We believe that unraveling sex differences in the host response to sepsis and its treatment could be the first step in personalized, phenotype-based management of patients with sepsis and septic shock. MDPI 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10058943/ /pubmed/36985319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030746 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Lakbar, Ines Einav, Sharon Lalevée, Nathalie Martin-Loeches, Ignacio Pastene, Bruno Leone, Marc Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future |
title | Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future |
title_full | Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future |
title_fullStr | Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future |
title_full_unstemmed | Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future |
title_short | Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future |
title_sort | interactions between gender and sepsis—implications for the future |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36985319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030746 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lakbarines interactionsbetweengenderandsepsisimplicationsforthefuture AT einavsharon interactionsbetweengenderandsepsisimplicationsforthefuture AT laleveenathalie interactionsbetweengenderandsepsisimplicationsforthefuture AT martinloechesignacio interactionsbetweengenderandsepsisimplicationsforthefuture AT pastenebruno interactionsbetweengenderandsepsisimplicationsforthefuture AT leonemarc interactionsbetweengenderandsepsisimplicationsforthefuture |