Cargando…

Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future

Sex and gender dimorphisms are found in a large variety of diseases, including sepsis and septic shock which are more prevalent in men than in women. Animal models show that the host response to pathogens differs in females and males. This difference is partially explained by sex polarization of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lakbar, Ines, Einav, Sharon, Lalevée, Nathalie, Martin-Loeches, Ignacio, Pastene, Bruno, Leone, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36985319
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030746
_version_ 1785016756555743232
author Lakbar, Ines
Einav, Sharon
Lalevée, Nathalie
Martin-Loeches, Ignacio
Pastene, Bruno
Leone, Marc
author_facet Lakbar, Ines
Einav, Sharon
Lalevée, Nathalie
Martin-Loeches, Ignacio
Pastene, Bruno
Leone, Marc
author_sort Lakbar, Ines
collection PubMed
description Sex and gender dimorphisms are found in a large variety of diseases, including sepsis and septic shock which are more prevalent in men than in women. Animal models show that the host response to pathogens differs in females and males. This difference is partially explained by sex polarization of the intracellular pathways responding to pathogen–cell receptor interactions. Sex hormones seem to be responsible for this polarization, although other factors, such as chromosomal effects, have yet to be investigated. In brief, females are less susceptible to sepsis and seem to recover more effectively than males. Clinical observations produce more nuanced findings, but men consistently have a higher incidence of sepsis, and some reports also claim higher mortality rates. However, variables other than hormonal differences complicate the interaction between sex and sepsis, including comorbidities as well as social and cultural differences between men and women. Conflicting data have also been reported regarding sepsis-attributable mortality rates among pregnant women, compared with non-pregnant females. We believe that unraveling sex differences in the host response to sepsis and its treatment could be the first step in personalized, phenotype-based management of patients with sepsis and septic shock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10058943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100589432023-03-30 Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future Lakbar, Ines Einav, Sharon Lalevée, Nathalie Martin-Loeches, Ignacio Pastene, Bruno Leone, Marc Microorganisms Review Sex and gender dimorphisms are found in a large variety of diseases, including sepsis and septic shock which are more prevalent in men than in women. Animal models show that the host response to pathogens differs in females and males. This difference is partially explained by sex polarization of the intracellular pathways responding to pathogen–cell receptor interactions. Sex hormones seem to be responsible for this polarization, although other factors, such as chromosomal effects, have yet to be investigated. In brief, females are less susceptible to sepsis and seem to recover more effectively than males. Clinical observations produce more nuanced findings, but men consistently have a higher incidence of sepsis, and some reports also claim higher mortality rates. However, variables other than hormonal differences complicate the interaction between sex and sepsis, including comorbidities as well as social and cultural differences between men and women. Conflicting data have also been reported regarding sepsis-attributable mortality rates among pregnant women, compared with non-pregnant females. We believe that unraveling sex differences in the host response to sepsis and its treatment could be the first step in personalized, phenotype-based management of patients with sepsis and septic shock. MDPI 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10058943/ /pubmed/36985319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030746 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Lakbar, Ines
Einav, Sharon
Lalevée, Nathalie
Martin-Loeches, Ignacio
Pastene, Bruno
Leone, Marc
Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future
title Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future
title_full Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future
title_fullStr Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future
title_full_unstemmed Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future
title_short Interactions between Gender and Sepsis—Implications for the Future
title_sort interactions between gender and sepsis—implications for the future
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36985319
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030746
work_keys_str_mv AT lakbarines interactionsbetweengenderandsepsisimplicationsforthefuture
AT einavsharon interactionsbetweengenderandsepsisimplicationsforthefuture
AT laleveenathalie interactionsbetweengenderandsepsisimplicationsforthefuture
AT martinloechesignacio interactionsbetweengenderandsepsisimplicationsforthefuture
AT pastenebruno interactionsbetweengenderandsepsisimplicationsforthefuture
AT leonemarc interactionsbetweengenderandsepsisimplicationsforthefuture