Cargando…

Measuring Domain-Specific Knowledge: From Bach to Fibonacci

Along with crystallized intelligence (Gc), domain-specific knowledge (Gkn) is an important ability within the nomological net of acquired knowledge. Although Gkn has been shown to predict important life outcomes, only a few standardized tests measuring Gkn exist, especially for the adult population....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rusche, Marianna Massimilla, Ziegler, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10059680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36976140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030047
_version_ 1785016932021305344
author Rusche, Marianna Massimilla
Ziegler, Matthias
author_facet Rusche, Marianna Massimilla
Ziegler, Matthias
author_sort Rusche, Marianna Massimilla
collection PubMed
description Along with crystallized intelligence (Gc), domain-specific knowledge (Gkn) is an important ability within the nomological net of acquired knowledge. Although Gkn has been shown to predict important life outcomes, only a few standardized tests measuring Gkn exist, especially for the adult population. Complicating things, Gkn tests from different cultural circles cannot simply be translated as they need to be culture specific. Hence, this study aimed to develop a Gkn test culturally sensitive to a German population and to provide initial evidence for the resulting scores’ psychometric quality. Existing Gkn tests often mirror a school curriculum. We aimed to operationalize Gkn not solely based upon a typical curriculum to investigate a research question regarding the curriculum dependence of the resulting Gkn structure. A set of newly developed items from a broad range of knowledge categories was presented online to 1450 participants divided into a high (fluid intelligence, Gf) Gf (n = 415) and an unselected Gf subsample (n = 1035). Results support the notion of a hierarchical model comparable to the one curriculum-based tests scores have, with one factor at the top and three narrower factors below (Humanities, Science, Civics) for which each can be divided into smaller knowledge facets. Besides this initial evidence regarding structural validity, the scale scores’ reliability estimates are reported, and criterion validity-related evidence based on a known-groups design is provided. Results indicate the psychometric quality of the scores and are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10059680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100596802023-03-30 Measuring Domain-Specific Knowledge: From Bach to Fibonacci Rusche, Marianna Massimilla Ziegler, Matthias J Intell Article Along with crystallized intelligence (Gc), domain-specific knowledge (Gkn) is an important ability within the nomological net of acquired knowledge. Although Gkn has been shown to predict important life outcomes, only a few standardized tests measuring Gkn exist, especially for the adult population. Complicating things, Gkn tests from different cultural circles cannot simply be translated as they need to be culture specific. Hence, this study aimed to develop a Gkn test culturally sensitive to a German population and to provide initial evidence for the resulting scores’ psychometric quality. Existing Gkn tests often mirror a school curriculum. We aimed to operationalize Gkn not solely based upon a typical curriculum to investigate a research question regarding the curriculum dependence of the resulting Gkn structure. A set of newly developed items from a broad range of knowledge categories was presented online to 1450 participants divided into a high (fluid intelligence, Gf) Gf (n = 415) and an unselected Gf subsample (n = 1035). Results support the notion of a hierarchical model comparable to the one curriculum-based tests scores have, with one factor at the top and three narrower factors below (Humanities, Science, Civics) for which each can be divided into smaller knowledge facets. Besides this initial evidence regarding structural validity, the scale scores’ reliability estimates are reported, and criterion validity-related evidence based on a known-groups design is provided. Results indicate the psychometric quality of the scores and are discussed. MDPI 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10059680/ /pubmed/36976140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030047 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rusche, Marianna Massimilla
Ziegler, Matthias
Measuring Domain-Specific Knowledge: From Bach to Fibonacci
title Measuring Domain-Specific Knowledge: From Bach to Fibonacci
title_full Measuring Domain-Specific Knowledge: From Bach to Fibonacci
title_fullStr Measuring Domain-Specific Knowledge: From Bach to Fibonacci
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Domain-Specific Knowledge: From Bach to Fibonacci
title_short Measuring Domain-Specific Knowledge: From Bach to Fibonacci
title_sort measuring domain-specific knowledge: from bach to fibonacci
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10059680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36976140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030047
work_keys_str_mv AT ruschemariannamassimilla measuringdomainspecificknowledgefrombachtofibonacci
AT zieglermatthias measuringdomainspecificknowledgefrombachtofibonacci