Cargando…

Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Techniques in Carboxylated-Pillar[6]arene Host–Guest Binding: III. Force-Field Comparison, Three-Trajectory Realization and Further Dielectric Augmentation

Host–guest binding, despite the relatively simple structural and chemical features of individual components, still poses a challenge in computational modelling. The extreme underperformance of standard end-point methods in host–guest binding makes them practically useless. In the current work, we ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xiao, Zheng, Lei, Qin, Chu, Cong, Yalong, Zhang, John Z. H., Sun, Zhaoxi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10059726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36985739
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062767
_version_ 1785016943612264448
author Liu, Xiao
Zheng, Lei
Qin, Chu
Cong, Yalong
Zhang, John Z. H.
Sun, Zhaoxi
author_facet Liu, Xiao
Zheng, Lei
Qin, Chu
Cong, Yalong
Zhang, John Z. H.
Sun, Zhaoxi
author_sort Liu, Xiao
collection PubMed
description Host–guest binding, despite the relatively simple structural and chemical features of individual components, still poses a challenge in computational modelling. The extreme underperformance of standard end-point methods in host–guest binding makes them practically useless. In the current work, we explore a potentially promising modification of the three-trajectory realization. The alteration couples the binding-induced structural reorganization into free energy estimation and suffers from dramatic fluctuations in internal energies in protein–ligand situations. Fortunately, the relatively small size of host–guest systems minimizes the magnitude of internal fluctuations and makes the three-trajectory realization practically suitable. Due to the incorporation of intra-molecular interactions in free energy estimation, a strong dependence on the force field parameters could be incurred. Thus, a term-specific investigation of transferable GAFF derivatives is presented, and noticeable differences in many aspects are identified between commonly applied GAFF and GAFF2. These force-field differences lead to different dynamic behaviors of the macrocyclic host, which ultimately would influence the end-point sampling and binding thermodynamics. Therefore, the three-trajectory end-point free energy calculations are performed with both GAFF versions. Additionally, due to the noticeable differences between host dynamics under GAFF and GAFF2, we add additional benchmarks of the single-trajectory end-point calculations. When only the ranks of binding affinities are pursued, the three-trajectory realization performs very well, comparable to and even better than the regressed PBSA_E scoring function and the dielectric constant-variable regime. With the GAFF parameter set, the TIP3P water in explicit solvent sampling and either PB or GB implicit solvent model in free energy estimation, the predictive power of the three-trajectory realization in ranking calculations surpasses all existing end-point methods on this dataset. We further combine the three-trajectory realization with another promising modified end-point regime of varying the interior dielectric constant. The combined regime does not incur sizable improvements for ranks and deviations from experiment exhibit non-monotonic variations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10059726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100597262023-03-30 Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Techniques in Carboxylated-Pillar[6]arene Host–Guest Binding: III. Force-Field Comparison, Three-Trajectory Realization and Further Dielectric Augmentation Liu, Xiao Zheng, Lei Qin, Chu Cong, Yalong Zhang, John Z. H. Sun, Zhaoxi Molecules Article Host–guest binding, despite the relatively simple structural and chemical features of individual components, still poses a challenge in computational modelling. The extreme underperformance of standard end-point methods in host–guest binding makes them practically useless. In the current work, we explore a potentially promising modification of the three-trajectory realization. The alteration couples the binding-induced structural reorganization into free energy estimation and suffers from dramatic fluctuations in internal energies in protein–ligand situations. Fortunately, the relatively small size of host–guest systems minimizes the magnitude of internal fluctuations and makes the three-trajectory realization practically suitable. Due to the incorporation of intra-molecular interactions in free energy estimation, a strong dependence on the force field parameters could be incurred. Thus, a term-specific investigation of transferable GAFF derivatives is presented, and noticeable differences in many aspects are identified between commonly applied GAFF and GAFF2. These force-field differences lead to different dynamic behaviors of the macrocyclic host, which ultimately would influence the end-point sampling and binding thermodynamics. Therefore, the three-trajectory end-point free energy calculations are performed with both GAFF versions. Additionally, due to the noticeable differences between host dynamics under GAFF and GAFF2, we add additional benchmarks of the single-trajectory end-point calculations. When only the ranks of binding affinities are pursued, the three-trajectory realization performs very well, comparable to and even better than the regressed PBSA_E scoring function and the dielectric constant-variable regime. With the GAFF parameter set, the TIP3P water in explicit solvent sampling and either PB or GB implicit solvent model in free energy estimation, the predictive power of the three-trajectory realization in ranking calculations surpasses all existing end-point methods on this dataset. We further combine the three-trajectory realization with another promising modified end-point regime of varying the interior dielectric constant. The combined regime does not incur sizable improvements for ranks and deviations from experiment exhibit non-monotonic variations. MDPI 2023-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10059726/ /pubmed/36985739 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062767 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Xiao
Zheng, Lei
Qin, Chu
Cong, Yalong
Zhang, John Z. H.
Sun, Zhaoxi
Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Techniques in Carboxylated-Pillar[6]arene Host–Guest Binding: III. Force-Field Comparison, Three-Trajectory Realization and Further Dielectric Augmentation
title Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Techniques in Carboxylated-Pillar[6]arene Host–Guest Binding: III. Force-Field Comparison, Three-Trajectory Realization and Further Dielectric Augmentation
title_full Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Techniques in Carboxylated-Pillar[6]arene Host–Guest Binding: III. Force-Field Comparison, Three-Trajectory Realization and Further Dielectric Augmentation
title_fullStr Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Techniques in Carboxylated-Pillar[6]arene Host–Guest Binding: III. Force-Field Comparison, Three-Trajectory Realization and Further Dielectric Augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Techniques in Carboxylated-Pillar[6]arene Host–Guest Binding: III. Force-Field Comparison, Three-Trajectory Realization and Further Dielectric Augmentation
title_short Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Techniques in Carboxylated-Pillar[6]arene Host–Guest Binding: III. Force-Field Comparison, Three-Trajectory Realization and Further Dielectric Augmentation
title_sort comprehensive evaluation of end-point free energy techniques in carboxylated-pillar[6]arene host–guest binding: iii. force-field comparison, three-trajectory realization and further dielectric augmentation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10059726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36985739
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062767
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxiao comprehensiveevaluationofendpointfreeenergytechniquesincarboxylatedpillar6arenehostguestbindingiiiforcefieldcomparisonthreetrajectoryrealizationandfurtherdielectricaugmentation
AT zhenglei comprehensiveevaluationofendpointfreeenergytechniquesincarboxylatedpillar6arenehostguestbindingiiiforcefieldcomparisonthreetrajectoryrealizationandfurtherdielectricaugmentation
AT qinchu comprehensiveevaluationofendpointfreeenergytechniquesincarboxylatedpillar6arenehostguestbindingiiiforcefieldcomparisonthreetrajectoryrealizationandfurtherdielectricaugmentation
AT congyalong comprehensiveevaluationofendpointfreeenergytechniquesincarboxylatedpillar6arenehostguestbindingiiiforcefieldcomparisonthreetrajectoryrealizationandfurtherdielectricaugmentation
AT zhangjohnzh comprehensiveevaluationofendpointfreeenergytechniquesincarboxylatedpillar6arenehostguestbindingiiiforcefieldcomparisonthreetrajectoryrealizationandfurtherdielectricaugmentation
AT sunzhaoxi comprehensiveevaluationofendpointfreeenergytechniquesincarboxylatedpillar6arenehostguestbindingiiiforcefieldcomparisonthreetrajectoryrealizationandfurtherdielectricaugmentation