Cargando…
Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Prolapse Hysterectomy with Apical Fixation: A Retrospective Comparison over an 18 Year Period
Background. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common health problem, with a high lifetime risk for prolapse surgery. Uterine-preserving procedures such as vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH) have become an increasingly utilized surgical option for the primary treatment of POP. We wanted to evaluat...
Autores principales: | Carlin, Greta Lisa, Lange, Sören, Ziegler, Christina, Heinzl, Florian, Bodner-Adler, Barbara |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10059856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062176 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Bilateral Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with Vaginal Hysterectomy for Apical Uterovaginal Prolapse
por: Wang, Kaiyue, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse
por: Jirschele, K., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus
por: Dietz, Viviane, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
A novel bilateral anterior sacrospinous hysteropexy technique for apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via the vaginal route: a cohort study
por: Naumann, Gert, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
por: Detollenaere, Renée J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)