Cargando…

Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations

Purpose: Several suture techniques have been described in the past for direct ACL repair with poor healing capacity and a high re-rupture rate. Therefore, we investigated a refixation technique for acute primary proximal ACL repair. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical propertie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosslenbroich, Steffen B., Achtnich, Andrea, Brodkorb, Cathrin, Kösters, Clemens, Kreis, Carolin, Metzlaff, Sebastian, Schliemann, Benedikt, Petersen, Wolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10059937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983341
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062340
_version_ 1785016994729295872
author Rosslenbroich, Steffen B.
Achtnich, Andrea
Brodkorb, Cathrin
Kösters, Clemens
Kreis, Carolin
Metzlaff, Sebastian
Schliemann, Benedikt
Petersen, Wolf
author_facet Rosslenbroich, Steffen B.
Achtnich, Andrea
Brodkorb, Cathrin
Kösters, Clemens
Kreis, Carolin
Metzlaff, Sebastian
Schliemann, Benedikt
Petersen, Wolf
author_sort Rosslenbroich, Steffen B.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Several suture techniques have been described in the past for direct ACL repair with poor healing capacity and a high re-rupture rate. Therefore, we investigated a refixation technique for acute primary proximal ACL repair. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical properties of different suture configurations using a knotless anchor. Methods: In this study, 35 fresh-frozen porcine knees underwent proximal ACL refixation. First, in 10 porcine femora, the biomechanical properties of the knotless anchor, without the ligament attached, were tested. Then, three different suture configurations were evaluated to reattach the remaining ACL. Using a material testing machine, the structural properties were evaluated for cyclic loading followed by loading to failure. Results: The ultimate failure load of the knotless anchor was 198, 76 N ± 23, 4 N significantly higher than all of the tested ACL suture configurations. Comparing the different configurations, the modified Kessler–Bunnell suture showed significant superior ultimate failure load, with 81, 2 N ± 15, 6 N compared to the twofold and single sutures (50, 5 N ± 14 N and 37, 5 ± 3, 8 N). In cyclic loading, there was no significant difference noted for the different configurations in terms of stiffness and elongation. Conclusions: The results of this in vitro study show that when performing ACL suture using a knotless anchor, a modified Kessler–Bunnell suture provides superior biomechanical properties than a single and a twofold suture. Within this construct, no failure at the bone–anchor interface was seen. Clinical relevance: Since primary suture repair techniques of ACL tears have been abandoned because of inconsistent results, ACL reconstruction remains the gold standard of treating ACL tears. However, with the latest improvements in surgical techniques, instrumentation, hardware and imaging, primary ACL suture repair might be a treatment option for a select group of patients. By establishing an arthroscopic technique in which proximal ACL avulsion can be reattached, the original ACL can be preserved by using a knotless anchor and a threefold suture configuration. Nevertheless, this technique provides an inferior ultimate failure load compared to graft techniques, so a careful rehabilitation program must be followed if using this technique in vivo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10059937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100599372023-03-30 Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations Rosslenbroich, Steffen B. Achtnich, Andrea Brodkorb, Cathrin Kösters, Clemens Kreis, Carolin Metzlaff, Sebastian Schliemann, Benedikt Petersen, Wolf J Clin Med Article Purpose: Several suture techniques have been described in the past for direct ACL repair with poor healing capacity and a high re-rupture rate. Therefore, we investigated a refixation technique for acute primary proximal ACL repair. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical properties of different suture configurations using a knotless anchor. Methods: In this study, 35 fresh-frozen porcine knees underwent proximal ACL refixation. First, in 10 porcine femora, the biomechanical properties of the knotless anchor, without the ligament attached, were tested. Then, three different suture configurations were evaluated to reattach the remaining ACL. Using a material testing machine, the structural properties were evaluated for cyclic loading followed by loading to failure. Results: The ultimate failure load of the knotless anchor was 198, 76 N ± 23, 4 N significantly higher than all of the tested ACL suture configurations. Comparing the different configurations, the modified Kessler–Bunnell suture showed significant superior ultimate failure load, with 81, 2 N ± 15, 6 N compared to the twofold and single sutures (50, 5 N ± 14 N and 37, 5 ± 3, 8 N). In cyclic loading, there was no significant difference noted for the different configurations in terms of stiffness and elongation. Conclusions: The results of this in vitro study show that when performing ACL suture using a knotless anchor, a modified Kessler–Bunnell suture provides superior biomechanical properties than a single and a twofold suture. Within this construct, no failure at the bone–anchor interface was seen. Clinical relevance: Since primary suture repair techniques of ACL tears have been abandoned because of inconsistent results, ACL reconstruction remains the gold standard of treating ACL tears. However, with the latest improvements in surgical techniques, instrumentation, hardware and imaging, primary ACL suture repair might be a treatment option for a select group of patients. By establishing an arthroscopic technique in which proximal ACL avulsion can be reattached, the original ACL can be preserved by using a knotless anchor and a threefold suture configuration. Nevertheless, this technique provides an inferior ultimate failure load compared to graft techniques, so a careful rehabilitation program must be followed if using this technique in vivo. MDPI 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10059937/ /pubmed/36983341 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062340 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rosslenbroich, Steffen B.
Achtnich, Andrea
Brodkorb, Cathrin
Kösters, Clemens
Kreis, Carolin
Metzlaff, Sebastian
Schliemann, Benedikt
Petersen, Wolf
Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations
title Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations
title_full Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations
title_fullStr Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations
title_full_unstemmed Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations
title_short Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations
title_sort primary proximal acl repair: a biomechanical evaluation of different arthroscopic suture configurations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10059937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983341
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062340
work_keys_str_mv AT rosslenbroichsteffenb primaryproximalaclrepairabiomechanicalevaluationofdifferentarthroscopicsutureconfigurations
AT achtnichandrea primaryproximalaclrepairabiomechanicalevaluationofdifferentarthroscopicsutureconfigurations
AT brodkorbcathrin primaryproximalaclrepairabiomechanicalevaluationofdifferentarthroscopicsutureconfigurations
AT kostersclemens primaryproximalaclrepairabiomechanicalevaluationofdifferentarthroscopicsutureconfigurations
AT kreiscarolin primaryproximalaclrepairabiomechanicalevaluationofdifferentarthroscopicsutureconfigurations
AT metzlaffsebastian primaryproximalaclrepairabiomechanicalevaluationofdifferentarthroscopicsutureconfigurations
AT schliemannbenedikt primaryproximalaclrepairabiomechanicalevaluationofdifferentarthroscopicsutureconfigurations
AT petersenwolf primaryproximalaclrepairabiomechanicalevaluationofdifferentarthroscopicsutureconfigurations