Cargando…
Effect of Protective Measures Adopted in the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hemodialysis Patients
Introduction The use of masks and other preventive measures is nowadays an essential measure to prevent COVID-19 infections, particularly in hemodialysis patients. The aim of this study was to understand whether these protective measures adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic reduced or somehow contai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37007313 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35552 |
_version_ | 1785017012244709376 |
---|---|
author | Ferreira, Duarte A Vida, Carlota Mendonça, Érica Vieira, Pedro Freitas, Sónia Silva, Gil |
author_facet | Ferreira, Duarte A Vida, Carlota Mendonça, Érica Vieira, Pedro Freitas, Sónia Silva, Gil |
author_sort | Ferreira, Duarte A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction The use of masks and other preventive measures is nowadays an essential measure to prevent COVID-19 infections, particularly in hemodialysis patients. The aim of this study was to understand whether these protective measures adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic reduced or somehow contained the number of respiratory infections in a population of hemodialysis patients. Methods This was a longitudinal retrospective single-center study of hemodialysis patients with at least six months of follow-up in a central hospital. A total of 103 patients were evaluated for the study. Two groups were defined: a control group that was followed in the year before the beginning of the pandemic and a group that followed in the year after its beginning. Results Patients in the pandemic group had a higher prevalence of previous major cardiovascular events (48.9% vs 8.6%) and heart failure (31.3% vs 12.1%) than those in the control group. Vaccination rates for influenza and pneumococcus as well as the monthly analytical results were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in lower respiratory infections, hospitalizations caused by lower respiratory infections, and mortality between both groups. However, not accounting for aspiration pneumonias, the pandemic group had half the mortality due to respiratory infections (2.2% vs 5.2%). Conclusion Despite patients in the pandemic group having a similar prevalence of respiratory infections and hospitalizations motivated by lower respiratory infections, they presented about half the mortality of the control group. This suggests that although there was no decrease in the number of infections, protective measures may have contributed to a decreased mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10060006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100600062023-03-30 Effect of Protective Measures Adopted in the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hemodialysis Patients Ferreira, Duarte A Vida, Carlota Mendonça, Érica Vieira, Pedro Freitas, Sónia Silva, Gil Cureus Internal Medicine Introduction The use of masks and other preventive measures is nowadays an essential measure to prevent COVID-19 infections, particularly in hemodialysis patients. The aim of this study was to understand whether these protective measures adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic reduced or somehow contained the number of respiratory infections in a population of hemodialysis patients. Methods This was a longitudinal retrospective single-center study of hemodialysis patients with at least six months of follow-up in a central hospital. A total of 103 patients were evaluated for the study. Two groups were defined: a control group that was followed in the year before the beginning of the pandemic and a group that followed in the year after its beginning. Results Patients in the pandemic group had a higher prevalence of previous major cardiovascular events (48.9% vs 8.6%) and heart failure (31.3% vs 12.1%) than those in the control group. Vaccination rates for influenza and pneumococcus as well as the monthly analytical results were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in lower respiratory infections, hospitalizations caused by lower respiratory infections, and mortality between both groups. However, not accounting for aspiration pneumonias, the pandemic group had half the mortality due to respiratory infections (2.2% vs 5.2%). Conclusion Despite patients in the pandemic group having a similar prevalence of respiratory infections and hospitalizations motivated by lower respiratory infections, they presented about half the mortality of the control group. This suggests that although there was no decrease in the number of infections, protective measures may have contributed to a decreased mortality. Cureus 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10060006/ /pubmed/37007313 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35552 Text en Copyright © 2023, Ferreira et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Internal Medicine Ferreira, Duarte A Vida, Carlota Mendonça, Érica Vieira, Pedro Freitas, Sónia Silva, Gil Effect of Protective Measures Adopted in the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hemodialysis Patients |
title | Effect of Protective Measures Adopted in the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hemodialysis Patients |
title_full | Effect of Protective Measures Adopted in the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hemodialysis Patients |
title_fullStr | Effect of Protective Measures Adopted in the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hemodialysis Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Protective Measures Adopted in the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hemodialysis Patients |
title_short | Effect of Protective Measures Adopted in the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hemodialysis Patients |
title_sort | effect of protective measures adopted in the covid-19 pandemic on hemodialysis patients |
topic | Internal Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37007313 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35552 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferreiraduartea effectofprotectivemeasuresadoptedinthecovid19pandemiconhemodialysispatients AT vidacarlota effectofprotectivemeasuresadoptedinthecovid19pandemiconhemodialysispatients AT mendoncaerica effectofprotectivemeasuresadoptedinthecovid19pandemiconhemodialysispatients AT vieirapedro effectofprotectivemeasuresadoptedinthecovid19pandemiconhemodialysispatients AT freitassonia effectofprotectivemeasuresadoptedinthecovid19pandemiconhemodialysispatients AT silvagil effectofprotectivemeasuresadoptedinthecovid19pandemiconhemodialysispatients |