Cargando…

Reliability of home-based remote and self-assessment of transfers using the Transfer Assessment Instrument among wheelchair users with spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of home-based remote and self-assessment of transfer quality using the Transfer Assessment Instrument (TAI) among wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Participant’s home environment. METHODS: Eighteen whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abou, Libak, Worobey, Lynn A., Rigot, Stephanie K., Stanley, Elizabeth, Rice, Laura A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36990980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41394-023-00567-5
Descripción
Sumario:STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of home-based remote and self-assessment of transfer quality using the Transfer Assessment Instrument (TAI) among wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Participant’s home environment. METHODS: Eighteen wheelchair users with SCI transferred from their wheelchair to a surface of their choice (bed, sofa, or bench) in their homes. During a live video conference, the transfer was recorded and evaluated live using the TAI (rater 1). Participants completed a self-assessment of their transfer using the TAI- questionnaire (TAI-Q). Two additional raters (raters 2 & 3) completed asynchronous assessments by watching recorded videos. Interrater reliability was assessed using Intraclass Coefficient Correlations (ICC) to compare rater 1 with the average of raters 2 & 3 and TAI-Q. Intrarater reliability was assessed by rater 1 completing another TAI by watching the recorded videos after a 4-week delay. Assessments were compared using paired sample t-tests and level of agreement between TAI scores was evaluated using Bland–Altman plots. RESULTS: Moderate to good interrater and good intrarater reliability were found for the total TAI score with ICCs: 0.57–0.90 and 0.90, respectively. Moderate to good intrarater and interrater reliability were found for all TAI subscores (ICC: 0.60–0.94) except for interrater reliability of flight/landing which was poor (ICC: 0.20). Bland–Altman plots indicate no systematic bias related to the measurement of error. CONCLUSIONS: The TAI is a reliable outcome measure for assessing the wheelchair and body setup phases of home-based transfers remotely and through self-assessment among individuals with SCI.