Cargando…

Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer is often challenging. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and robotic surgery have been introduced to overcome the technical difficulties in laparoscopic surgery and achieve more favorable outcomes. Hybrid robotic surgery, which combines Ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ando, Masayuki, Matsuda, Takeru, Sawada, Ryuichiro, Hasegawa, Hiroshi, Yamashita, Kimihiro, Harada, Hitoshi, Urakawa, Naoki, Goto, Hironobu, Kanaji, Shingo, Oshikiri, Taro, Kakeji, Yoshihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02870-z
_version_ 1785017062994739200
author Ando, Masayuki
Matsuda, Takeru
Sawada, Ryuichiro
Hasegawa, Hiroshi
Yamashita, Kimihiro
Harada, Hitoshi
Urakawa, Naoki
Goto, Hironobu
Kanaji, Shingo
Oshikiri, Taro
Kakeji, Yoshihiro
author_facet Ando, Masayuki
Matsuda, Takeru
Sawada, Ryuichiro
Hasegawa, Hiroshi
Yamashita, Kimihiro
Harada, Hitoshi
Urakawa, Naoki
Goto, Hironobu
Kanaji, Shingo
Oshikiri, Taro
Kakeji, Yoshihiro
author_sort Ando, Masayuki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer is often challenging. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and robotic surgery have been introduced to overcome the technical difficulties in laparoscopic surgery and achieve more favorable outcomes. Hybrid robotic surgery, which combines TaTME with the abdominal robotic approach, incorporates the advantages of each of these surgical techniques and might achieve less invasive and safer surgery. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of hybrid robotic surgery with TaTME (hybrid TaTME). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 162 TaTME cases performed at our department from September 2016 to May 2022. Among them, 92 cases of conventional TaTME and 30 of hybrid TaTME were eligible. We used propensity score matching analysis (PSM) to adjust for patients’ characteristics and compared the short-term outcomes of the two treatment groups. RESULTS: Twenty-seven cases in each group were extracted using PSM. The operation time in hybrid TaTME was comparable to that in conventional TaTME. There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Other intra- and post-operative outcomes were also comparable between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the curative resection and recurrence rates. CONCLUSION: Hybrid TaTME for low rectal cancer was as favorable as conventional TaTME in producing satisfactory short-term outcomes. However, furthermore, larger-scale studies conducted over longer study periods are needed to evaluate the validity of the findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10060269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100602692023-03-31 Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision Ando, Masayuki Matsuda, Takeru Sawada, Ryuichiro Hasegawa, Hiroshi Yamashita, Kimihiro Harada, Hitoshi Urakawa, Naoki Goto, Hironobu Kanaji, Shingo Oshikiri, Taro Kakeji, Yoshihiro Langenbecks Arch Surg Research PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer is often challenging. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and robotic surgery have been introduced to overcome the technical difficulties in laparoscopic surgery and achieve more favorable outcomes. Hybrid robotic surgery, which combines TaTME with the abdominal robotic approach, incorporates the advantages of each of these surgical techniques and might achieve less invasive and safer surgery. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of hybrid robotic surgery with TaTME (hybrid TaTME). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 162 TaTME cases performed at our department from September 2016 to May 2022. Among them, 92 cases of conventional TaTME and 30 of hybrid TaTME were eligible. We used propensity score matching analysis (PSM) to adjust for patients’ characteristics and compared the short-term outcomes of the two treatment groups. RESULTS: Twenty-seven cases in each group were extracted using PSM. The operation time in hybrid TaTME was comparable to that in conventional TaTME. There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Other intra- and post-operative outcomes were also comparable between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the curative resection and recurrence rates. CONCLUSION: Hybrid TaTME for low rectal cancer was as favorable as conventional TaTME in producing satisfactory short-term outcomes. However, furthermore, larger-scale studies conducted over longer study periods are needed to evaluate the validity of the findings. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10060269/ /pubmed/36991217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02870-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Ando, Masayuki
Matsuda, Takeru
Sawada, Ryuichiro
Hasegawa, Hiroshi
Yamashita, Kimihiro
Harada, Hitoshi
Urakawa, Naoki
Goto, Hironobu
Kanaji, Shingo
Oshikiri, Taro
Kakeji, Yoshihiro
Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision
title Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision
title_full Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision
title_fullStr Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision
title_short Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision
title_sort feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02870-z
work_keys_str_mv AT andomasayuki feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision
AT matsudatakeru feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision
AT sawadaryuichiro feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision
AT hasegawahiroshi feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision
AT yamashitakimihiro feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision
AT haradahitoshi feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision
AT urakawanaoki feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision
AT gotohironobu feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision
AT kanajishingo feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision
AT oshikiritaro feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision
AT kakejiyoshihiro feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision