Cargando…
Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer is often challenging. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and robotic surgery have been introduced to overcome the technical difficulties in laparoscopic surgery and achieve more favorable outcomes. Hybrid robotic surgery, which combines Ta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02870-z |
_version_ | 1785017062994739200 |
---|---|
author | Ando, Masayuki Matsuda, Takeru Sawada, Ryuichiro Hasegawa, Hiroshi Yamashita, Kimihiro Harada, Hitoshi Urakawa, Naoki Goto, Hironobu Kanaji, Shingo Oshikiri, Taro Kakeji, Yoshihiro |
author_facet | Ando, Masayuki Matsuda, Takeru Sawada, Ryuichiro Hasegawa, Hiroshi Yamashita, Kimihiro Harada, Hitoshi Urakawa, Naoki Goto, Hironobu Kanaji, Shingo Oshikiri, Taro Kakeji, Yoshihiro |
author_sort | Ando, Masayuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer is often challenging. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and robotic surgery have been introduced to overcome the technical difficulties in laparoscopic surgery and achieve more favorable outcomes. Hybrid robotic surgery, which combines TaTME with the abdominal robotic approach, incorporates the advantages of each of these surgical techniques and might achieve less invasive and safer surgery. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of hybrid robotic surgery with TaTME (hybrid TaTME). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 162 TaTME cases performed at our department from September 2016 to May 2022. Among them, 92 cases of conventional TaTME and 30 of hybrid TaTME were eligible. We used propensity score matching analysis (PSM) to adjust for patients’ characteristics and compared the short-term outcomes of the two treatment groups. RESULTS: Twenty-seven cases in each group were extracted using PSM. The operation time in hybrid TaTME was comparable to that in conventional TaTME. There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Other intra- and post-operative outcomes were also comparable between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the curative resection and recurrence rates. CONCLUSION: Hybrid TaTME for low rectal cancer was as favorable as conventional TaTME in producing satisfactory short-term outcomes. However, furthermore, larger-scale studies conducted over longer study periods are needed to evaluate the validity of the findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10060269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100602692023-03-31 Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision Ando, Masayuki Matsuda, Takeru Sawada, Ryuichiro Hasegawa, Hiroshi Yamashita, Kimihiro Harada, Hitoshi Urakawa, Naoki Goto, Hironobu Kanaji, Shingo Oshikiri, Taro Kakeji, Yoshihiro Langenbecks Arch Surg Research PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer is often challenging. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and robotic surgery have been introduced to overcome the technical difficulties in laparoscopic surgery and achieve more favorable outcomes. Hybrid robotic surgery, which combines TaTME with the abdominal robotic approach, incorporates the advantages of each of these surgical techniques and might achieve less invasive and safer surgery. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of hybrid robotic surgery with TaTME (hybrid TaTME). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 162 TaTME cases performed at our department from September 2016 to May 2022. Among them, 92 cases of conventional TaTME and 30 of hybrid TaTME were eligible. We used propensity score matching analysis (PSM) to adjust for patients’ characteristics and compared the short-term outcomes of the two treatment groups. RESULTS: Twenty-seven cases in each group were extracted using PSM. The operation time in hybrid TaTME was comparable to that in conventional TaTME. There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Other intra- and post-operative outcomes were also comparable between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the curative resection and recurrence rates. CONCLUSION: Hybrid TaTME for low rectal cancer was as favorable as conventional TaTME in producing satisfactory short-term outcomes. However, furthermore, larger-scale studies conducted over longer study periods are needed to evaluate the validity of the findings. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10060269/ /pubmed/36991217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02870-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Ando, Masayuki Matsuda, Takeru Sawada, Ryuichiro Hasegawa, Hiroshi Yamashita, Kimihiro Harada, Hitoshi Urakawa, Naoki Goto, Hironobu Kanaji, Shingo Oshikiri, Taro Kakeji, Yoshihiro Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision |
title | Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision |
title_full | Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision |
title_short | Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision |
title_sort | feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02870-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andomasayuki feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision AT matsudatakeru feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision AT sawadaryuichiro feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision AT hasegawahiroshi feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision AT yamashitakimihiro feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision AT haradahitoshi feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision AT urakawanaoki feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision AT gotohironobu feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision AT kanajishingo feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision AT oshikiritaro feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision AT kakejiyoshihiro feasibilityandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforlowrectalcancercombinedwithtransanaltotalmesorectalexcision |