Cargando…

Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?

In response to rapidly rising pharmaceutical costs, many countries have introduced health technology assessment (HTA) as a ‘fourth hurdle’. We evaluated the causal effect of HTA based regulation on access to pharmaceuticals by using the introduction of Germany’s HTA system (AMNOG) in 2011. We obtain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Büssgen, Melanie, Stargardt, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35708786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01484-4
_version_ 1785017077328773120
author Büssgen, Melanie
Stargardt, Tom
author_facet Büssgen, Melanie
Stargardt, Tom
author_sort Büssgen, Melanie
collection PubMed
description In response to rapidly rising pharmaceutical costs, many countries have introduced health technology assessment (HTA) as a ‘fourth hurdle’. We evaluated the causal effect of HTA based regulation on access to pharmaceuticals by using the introduction of Germany’s HTA system (AMNOG) in 2011. We obtained launch data on pharmaceuticals for 30 European countries from the IQVIA (formerly IMS) database. Using difference-in-difference models, we estimated the effect of AMNOG on launch delay, the ranking order of launch delays, and the availability of pharmaceuticals. We then compared the results for Germany to Austria, Czechia, Italy, Portugal, and the UK. Across all six countries, launch delays decreased from the pre-AMNOG period (25.01 months) to the post-AMNOG period (14.34 months). However, the introduction of AMNOG consistently reduced the magnitude of the decrease in launch delay in Germany compared to the comparator countries (staggered DiD: + 4.31 months, p = 0.05). Our logit results indicate that the availability of pharmaceuticals in Germany increased as a result of AMNOG (staggered logit: + 5.78%, p = 0.009). We provide evidence on the trade-off between regulation and access. This can help policymakers make better-informed decisions to strike the right balance between cost savings achieved through HTA based regulation and access to pharmaceuticals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10060338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100603382023-03-31 Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals? Büssgen, Melanie Stargardt, Tom Eur J Health Econ Original Paper In response to rapidly rising pharmaceutical costs, many countries have introduced health technology assessment (HTA) as a ‘fourth hurdle’. We evaluated the causal effect of HTA based regulation on access to pharmaceuticals by using the introduction of Germany’s HTA system (AMNOG) in 2011. We obtained launch data on pharmaceuticals for 30 European countries from the IQVIA (formerly IMS) database. Using difference-in-difference models, we estimated the effect of AMNOG on launch delay, the ranking order of launch delays, and the availability of pharmaceuticals. We then compared the results for Germany to Austria, Czechia, Italy, Portugal, and the UK. Across all six countries, launch delays decreased from the pre-AMNOG period (25.01 months) to the post-AMNOG period (14.34 months). However, the introduction of AMNOG consistently reduced the magnitude of the decrease in launch delay in Germany compared to the comparator countries (staggered DiD: + 4.31 months, p = 0.05). Our logit results indicate that the availability of pharmaceuticals in Germany increased as a result of AMNOG (staggered logit: + 5.78%, p = 0.009). We provide evidence on the trade-off between regulation and access. This can help policymakers make better-informed decisions to strike the right balance between cost savings achieved through HTA based regulation and access to pharmaceuticals. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10060338/ /pubmed/35708786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01484-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Büssgen, Melanie
Stargardt, Tom
Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?
title Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?
title_full Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?
title_fullStr Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?
title_full_unstemmed Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?
title_short Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?
title_sort does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35708786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01484-4
work_keys_str_mv AT bussgenmelanie doeshealthtechnologyassessmentcompromiseaccesstopharmaceuticals
AT stargardttom doeshealthtechnologyassessmentcompromiseaccesstopharmaceuticals