Cargando…

Severity of Local Skin Reactions with 4% 5-Fluorouracil Plus Emollient versus 4% 5-Fluorouracil Alone in Patients with Actinic Keratosis: A Single-Blind Randomised Trial

INTRODUCTION: Topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-containing treatments are effective for actinic keratosis (AK); however, they frequently lead to transient local skin reactions (LSRs), which often result in treatment non-adherence. METHODS: The aim of this international, phase IV clinical trial was to in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stockfleth, Eggert, Jouary, Thomas, Farnetani, Francesca, Pascual, Antonio Macaya, De Almeida Agudo, Cecilia, Voisard, Jean-Jacques, Bégeault, Nathalie, Delarue, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36856965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-023-00902-6
_version_ 1785017098261495808
author Stockfleth, Eggert
Jouary, Thomas
Farnetani, Francesca
Pascual, Antonio Macaya
De Almeida Agudo, Cecilia
Voisard, Jean-Jacques
Bégeault, Nathalie
Delarue, Alain
author_facet Stockfleth, Eggert
Jouary, Thomas
Farnetani, Francesca
Pascual, Antonio Macaya
De Almeida Agudo, Cecilia
Voisard, Jean-Jacques
Bégeault, Nathalie
Delarue, Alain
author_sort Stockfleth, Eggert
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-containing treatments are effective for actinic keratosis (AK); however, they frequently lead to transient local skin reactions (LSRs), which often result in treatment non-adherence. METHODS: The aim of this international, phase IV clinical trial was to investigate whether addition of an emollient to topical 4% 5-FU would reduce the frequency and severity of LSRs over 4 weeks of treatment (intervention group) compared with 4% 5-FU alone (control group) in patients with AK. The primary objective was to assess the severity of LSRs (i.e. erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation and erosion/ulceration) at week 4 of treatment (or before, in case of a major local reaction). Key secondary objectives were LSR total scores at weeks 2 and 8, the scores of individual LSR items at each visit, and the proportions of patients with 100% and ≥ 75% AK lesion clearance at week 8. RESULTS: In total, 141 patients were included in the efficacy analysis (71 in the intervention group and 70 in the control group). There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between the treatment groups in terms of LSR total score at week 4 (overall and by subgroups defined by the number of lesions and patient age at baseline), scores of individual LSR items at any time point, and AK lesion clearance rates at week 8. LSR scores with topical 4% 5-FU alone were lower than expected. Skin reactions were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events in both groups, leading to treatment discontinuation in nine patients (12.3%) in the intervention group and seven (9.9%) in the control group. No new safety signals were observed with the addition of an emollient to 4% 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: Daily emollient applications during the 4-week treatment course did not impact the safety and efficacy profile of 4% 5-FU. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-023-00902-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10060461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100604612023-03-31 Severity of Local Skin Reactions with 4% 5-Fluorouracil Plus Emollient versus 4% 5-Fluorouracil Alone in Patients with Actinic Keratosis: A Single-Blind Randomised Trial Stockfleth, Eggert Jouary, Thomas Farnetani, Francesca Pascual, Antonio Macaya De Almeida Agudo, Cecilia Voisard, Jean-Jacques Bégeault, Nathalie Delarue, Alain Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-containing treatments are effective for actinic keratosis (AK); however, they frequently lead to transient local skin reactions (LSRs), which often result in treatment non-adherence. METHODS: The aim of this international, phase IV clinical trial was to investigate whether addition of an emollient to topical 4% 5-FU would reduce the frequency and severity of LSRs over 4 weeks of treatment (intervention group) compared with 4% 5-FU alone (control group) in patients with AK. The primary objective was to assess the severity of LSRs (i.e. erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation and erosion/ulceration) at week 4 of treatment (or before, in case of a major local reaction). Key secondary objectives were LSR total scores at weeks 2 and 8, the scores of individual LSR items at each visit, and the proportions of patients with 100% and ≥ 75% AK lesion clearance at week 8. RESULTS: In total, 141 patients were included in the efficacy analysis (71 in the intervention group and 70 in the control group). There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between the treatment groups in terms of LSR total score at week 4 (overall and by subgroups defined by the number of lesions and patient age at baseline), scores of individual LSR items at any time point, and AK lesion clearance rates at week 8. LSR scores with topical 4% 5-FU alone were lower than expected. Skin reactions were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events in both groups, leading to treatment discontinuation in nine patients (12.3%) in the intervention group and seven (9.9%) in the control group. No new safety signals were observed with the addition of an emollient to 4% 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: Daily emollient applications during the 4-week treatment course did not impact the safety and efficacy profile of 4% 5-FU. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-023-00902-6. Springer Healthcare 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10060461/ /pubmed/36856965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-023-00902-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Stockfleth, Eggert
Jouary, Thomas
Farnetani, Francesca
Pascual, Antonio Macaya
De Almeida Agudo, Cecilia
Voisard, Jean-Jacques
Bégeault, Nathalie
Delarue, Alain
Severity of Local Skin Reactions with 4% 5-Fluorouracil Plus Emollient versus 4% 5-Fluorouracil Alone in Patients with Actinic Keratosis: A Single-Blind Randomised Trial
title Severity of Local Skin Reactions with 4% 5-Fluorouracil Plus Emollient versus 4% 5-Fluorouracil Alone in Patients with Actinic Keratosis: A Single-Blind Randomised Trial
title_full Severity of Local Skin Reactions with 4% 5-Fluorouracil Plus Emollient versus 4% 5-Fluorouracil Alone in Patients with Actinic Keratosis: A Single-Blind Randomised Trial
title_fullStr Severity of Local Skin Reactions with 4% 5-Fluorouracil Plus Emollient versus 4% 5-Fluorouracil Alone in Patients with Actinic Keratosis: A Single-Blind Randomised Trial
title_full_unstemmed Severity of Local Skin Reactions with 4% 5-Fluorouracil Plus Emollient versus 4% 5-Fluorouracil Alone in Patients with Actinic Keratosis: A Single-Blind Randomised Trial
title_short Severity of Local Skin Reactions with 4% 5-Fluorouracil Plus Emollient versus 4% 5-Fluorouracil Alone in Patients with Actinic Keratosis: A Single-Blind Randomised Trial
title_sort severity of local skin reactions with 4% 5-fluorouracil plus emollient versus 4% 5-fluorouracil alone in patients with actinic keratosis: a single-blind randomised trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36856965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-023-00902-6
work_keys_str_mv AT stockfletheggert severityoflocalskinreactionswith45fluorouracilplusemollientversus45fluorouracilaloneinpatientswithactinickeratosisasingleblindrandomisedtrial
AT jouarythomas severityoflocalskinreactionswith45fluorouracilplusemollientversus45fluorouracilaloneinpatientswithactinickeratosisasingleblindrandomisedtrial
AT farnetanifrancesca severityoflocalskinreactionswith45fluorouracilplusemollientversus45fluorouracilaloneinpatientswithactinickeratosisasingleblindrandomisedtrial
AT pascualantoniomacaya severityoflocalskinreactionswith45fluorouracilplusemollientversus45fluorouracilaloneinpatientswithactinickeratosisasingleblindrandomisedtrial
AT dealmeidaagudocecilia severityoflocalskinreactionswith45fluorouracilplusemollientversus45fluorouracilaloneinpatientswithactinickeratosisasingleblindrandomisedtrial
AT voisardjeanjacques severityoflocalskinreactionswith45fluorouracilplusemollientversus45fluorouracilaloneinpatientswithactinickeratosisasingleblindrandomisedtrial
AT begeaultnathalie severityoflocalskinreactionswith45fluorouracilplusemollientversus45fluorouracilaloneinpatientswithactinickeratosisasingleblindrandomisedtrial
AT delaruealain severityoflocalskinreactionswith45fluorouracilplusemollientversus45fluorouracilaloneinpatientswithactinickeratosisasingleblindrandomisedtrial