Cargando…

Comparing the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in elderly Asian patients with acute myocardial infraction

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend potent P2Y12 inhibitors for patients after acute coronary syndrome. However, the data on the efficacy and safety of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in elderly Asian populations was limited. We aimed to investigate the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), bleed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeh, Jong-Shiuan, Chen, Wan-Ting, Tomlinson, Brian, Tam, Weng-Chio, Chien, Li-Nien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37008324
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1143509
_version_ 1785017152118456320
author Yeh, Jong-Shiuan
Chen, Wan-Ting
Tomlinson, Brian
Tam, Weng-Chio
Chien, Li-Nien
author_facet Yeh, Jong-Shiuan
Chen, Wan-Ting
Tomlinson, Brian
Tam, Weng-Chio
Chien, Li-Nien
author_sort Yeh, Jong-Shiuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend potent P2Y12 inhibitors for patients after acute coronary syndrome. However, the data on the efficacy and safety of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in elderly Asian populations was limited. We aimed to investigate the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), bleeding events, and net adverse clinical events (NACE) with ticagrelor and clopidogrel in Taiwanese patients aged 65 and older after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: This retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database. The AMI patients aged ≥65 years who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and survived after 1 month were included. The patients were separated into 2 cohorts depending on the type of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) they received: ticagrelor plus aspirin (T + A) or clopidogrel plus aspirin (C + A). We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the difference between these 2 study groups. The outcome included all-cause mortality, MACE (cardiovascular death, nonfatal ischemic stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction), intracerebral hemorrhage, major bleeding, and NACE which is composed of cardiovascular death, ischemic and hemorrhagic events. The follow-up period was up to 12 months. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2017, a total of 14,715 patients who met the eligibility criteria were separated into 2 groups: 5,051 for T + A and 9,664 for C + A. Compared to patients with C + A, patients who received T + A had a lower risk of cardiovascular death and all-cause death, with an adjusted HR of 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.38–0.85, p = 0.006] and 0.58 (95% CI 0.45–0.74, p < 0.001), respectively. No differences were found in MACE, intracranial and major bleeding between the 2 groups. In addition, the patients with T + A had a lower risk of NACE with an adjusted HR of 0.86 (95% CI 0.74–1.00, p = 0.045) CONCLUSION: Among elderly AMI patients receiving DAPT after successful PCI, ticagrelor was a more favorable P2Y12 inhibitor than clopidogrel because of lowering the risk of death and NACE without increasing the risk of severe bleeding. Ticagrelor is an effective and safe P2Y12 inhibitor in Asian elderly survivors after PCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10060791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100607912023-03-31 Comparing the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in elderly Asian patients with acute myocardial infraction Yeh, Jong-Shiuan Chen, Wan-Ting Tomlinson, Brian Tam, Weng-Chio Chien, Li-Nien Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend potent P2Y12 inhibitors for patients after acute coronary syndrome. However, the data on the efficacy and safety of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in elderly Asian populations was limited. We aimed to investigate the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), bleeding events, and net adverse clinical events (NACE) with ticagrelor and clopidogrel in Taiwanese patients aged 65 and older after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: This retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database. The AMI patients aged ≥65 years who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and survived after 1 month were included. The patients were separated into 2 cohorts depending on the type of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) they received: ticagrelor plus aspirin (T + A) or clopidogrel plus aspirin (C + A). We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the difference between these 2 study groups. The outcome included all-cause mortality, MACE (cardiovascular death, nonfatal ischemic stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction), intracerebral hemorrhage, major bleeding, and NACE which is composed of cardiovascular death, ischemic and hemorrhagic events. The follow-up period was up to 12 months. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2017, a total of 14,715 patients who met the eligibility criteria were separated into 2 groups: 5,051 for T + A and 9,664 for C + A. Compared to patients with C + A, patients who received T + A had a lower risk of cardiovascular death and all-cause death, with an adjusted HR of 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.38–0.85, p = 0.006] and 0.58 (95% CI 0.45–0.74, p < 0.001), respectively. No differences were found in MACE, intracranial and major bleeding between the 2 groups. In addition, the patients with T + A had a lower risk of NACE with an adjusted HR of 0.86 (95% CI 0.74–1.00, p = 0.045) CONCLUSION: Among elderly AMI patients receiving DAPT after successful PCI, ticagrelor was a more favorable P2Y12 inhibitor than clopidogrel because of lowering the risk of death and NACE without increasing the risk of severe bleeding. Ticagrelor is an effective and safe P2Y12 inhibitor in Asian elderly survivors after PCI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10060791/ /pubmed/37008324 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1143509 Text en © 2023 Yeh, Chen, Tomlinson, Tam and Chien. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Yeh, Jong-Shiuan
Chen, Wan-Ting
Tomlinson, Brian
Tam, Weng-Chio
Chien, Li-Nien
Comparing the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in elderly Asian patients with acute myocardial infraction
title Comparing the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in elderly Asian patients with acute myocardial infraction
title_full Comparing the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in elderly Asian patients with acute myocardial infraction
title_fullStr Comparing the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in elderly Asian patients with acute myocardial infraction
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in elderly Asian patients with acute myocardial infraction
title_short Comparing the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in elderly Asian patients with acute myocardial infraction
title_sort comparing the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in elderly asian patients with acute myocardial infraction
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37008324
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1143509
work_keys_str_mv AT yehjongshiuan comparingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofdualantiplateletwithticagrelororclopidogrelinelderlyasianpatientswithacutemyocardialinfraction
AT chenwanting comparingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofdualantiplateletwithticagrelororclopidogrelinelderlyasianpatientswithacutemyocardialinfraction
AT tomlinsonbrian comparingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofdualantiplateletwithticagrelororclopidogrelinelderlyasianpatientswithacutemyocardialinfraction
AT tamwengchio comparingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofdualantiplateletwithticagrelororclopidogrelinelderlyasianpatientswithacutemyocardialinfraction
AT chienlinien comparingtheeffectivenessandsafetyofdualantiplateletwithticagrelororclopidogrelinelderlyasianpatientswithacutemyocardialinfraction