Cargando…
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression: An overview of systematic reviews
OBJECTIVE: There is conflicting published research about the clinical effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of post-stroke depression (PSD). In order to provide trustworthy information for upcoming therapeutic treatments, this review attempts to compi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37006488 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.930558 |
_version_ | 1785017208258166784 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Wanning Xue, Fuyu Yu, Bin Yu, Shuo Zhang, Weimin Huang, Haipeng |
author_facet | Gao, Wanning Xue, Fuyu Yu, Bin Yu, Shuo Zhang, Weimin Huang, Haipeng |
author_sort | Gao, Wanning |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: There is conflicting published research about the clinical effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of post-stroke depression (PSD). In order to provide trustworthy information for upcoming therapeutic treatments, this review attempts to compile and assess the data from pertinent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. METHODS: The systematic evaluation of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression was collected by searching CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Database, CBM, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The retrieval time is from database construction to September 2022. After selection, the included literature was evaluated for methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality using AMSTAR2, PRISMA statements, and the GRADE system. RESULTS: There were a total of 13 studies included, with three having generally comprehensive reporting according to the PRISMA statement, eight having some reporting issues, two having pretty substantial information issues, and 13 having extremely poor methodological quality according to the AMSTAR2. The GRADE was used to grade the quality of the evidence, and the included literature had 0 high-level evidence, eight medium-level evidence, 12 low-level evidence, and 22 very low-level evidence. LIMITATIONS: The results of this study are from researchers' subjective evaluation and only qualitative analysis, not quantitative evaluation. Although repeated cross-evaluation of researchers is carried out, the results will be personal. The interventions included in the study were complex, and it was impossible to analyze their effect values quantitatively. CONCLUSION: Patients with post-stroke depression may benefit from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. However, in terms of the quality of the reports, the methodology, and the quality of the evidence, published systematic evaluations/meta-analyses are of low quality. We list the drawbacks of the current clinical trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression as well as potential therapeutic mechanisms. This information may serve as a guide for future clinical trials aiming to establish a solid foundation for the clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke depression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10061017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100610172023-03-31 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression: An overview of systematic reviews Gao, Wanning Xue, Fuyu Yu, Bin Yu, Shuo Zhang, Weimin Huang, Haipeng Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: There is conflicting published research about the clinical effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of post-stroke depression (PSD). In order to provide trustworthy information for upcoming therapeutic treatments, this review attempts to compile and assess the data from pertinent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. METHODS: The systematic evaluation of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression was collected by searching CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Database, CBM, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The retrieval time is from database construction to September 2022. After selection, the included literature was evaluated for methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality using AMSTAR2, PRISMA statements, and the GRADE system. RESULTS: There were a total of 13 studies included, with three having generally comprehensive reporting according to the PRISMA statement, eight having some reporting issues, two having pretty substantial information issues, and 13 having extremely poor methodological quality according to the AMSTAR2. The GRADE was used to grade the quality of the evidence, and the included literature had 0 high-level evidence, eight medium-level evidence, 12 low-level evidence, and 22 very low-level evidence. LIMITATIONS: The results of this study are from researchers' subjective evaluation and only qualitative analysis, not quantitative evaluation. Although repeated cross-evaluation of researchers is carried out, the results will be personal. The interventions included in the study were complex, and it was impossible to analyze their effect values quantitatively. CONCLUSION: Patients with post-stroke depression may benefit from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. However, in terms of the quality of the reports, the methodology, and the quality of the evidence, published systematic evaluations/meta-analyses are of low quality. We list the drawbacks of the current clinical trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression as well as potential therapeutic mechanisms. This information may serve as a guide for future clinical trials aiming to establish a solid foundation for the clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke depression. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10061017/ /pubmed/37006488 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.930558 Text en Copyright © 2023 Gao, Xue, Yu, Yu, Zhang and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Gao, Wanning Xue, Fuyu Yu, Bin Yu, Shuo Zhang, Weimin Huang, Haipeng Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression: An overview of systematic reviews |
title | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression: An overview of systematic reviews |
title_full | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression: An overview of systematic reviews |
title_fullStr | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression: An overview of systematic reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression: An overview of systematic reviews |
title_short | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression: An overview of systematic reviews |
title_sort | repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression: an overview of systematic reviews |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37006488 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.930558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaowanning repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforpoststrokedepressionanoverviewofsystematicreviews AT xuefuyu repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforpoststrokedepressionanoverviewofsystematicreviews AT yubin repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforpoststrokedepressionanoverviewofsystematicreviews AT yushuo repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforpoststrokedepressionanoverviewofsystematicreviews AT zhangweimin repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforpoststrokedepressionanoverviewofsystematicreviews AT huanghaipeng repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforpoststrokedepressionanoverviewofsystematicreviews |