Cargando…

Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative

BACKGROUND: Mistrust in science and scientists may adversely influence the rate of COVID-19 vaccination and undermine public health initiatives to reduce virus transmission. METHODS: Students, staff and faculty responded to an email invitation to complete an electronic survey. Surveys included 21-it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicolo, Michele, Kawaguchi, Eric, Ghanem-Uzqueda, Angie, Soto, Daniel, Deva, Sohini, Shanker, Kush, Lee, Ryan, Gilliland, Frank, Klausner, Jeffrey D., Baezconde-Garbanati, Lourdes, Kovacs, Andrea, Van Orman, Sarah, Hu, Howard, Unger, Jennifer B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15533-x
_version_ 1785017277854253056
author Nicolo, Michele
Kawaguchi, Eric
Ghanem-Uzqueda, Angie
Soto, Daniel
Deva, Sohini
Shanker, Kush
Lee, Ryan
Gilliland, Frank
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
Baezconde-Garbanati, Lourdes
Kovacs, Andrea
Van Orman, Sarah
Hu, Howard
Unger, Jennifer B.
author_facet Nicolo, Michele
Kawaguchi, Eric
Ghanem-Uzqueda, Angie
Soto, Daniel
Deva, Sohini
Shanker, Kush
Lee, Ryan
Gilliland, Frank
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
Baezconde-Garbanati, Lourdes
Kovacs, Andrea
Van Orman, Sarah
Hu, Howard
Unger, Jennifer B.
author_sort Nicolo, Michele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mistrust in science and scientists may adversely influence the rate of COVID-19 vaccination and undermine public health initiatives to reduce virus transmission. METHODS: Students, staff and faculty responded to an email invitation to complete an electronic survey. Surveys included 21-items from the Trust in Science and Scientists Inventory questionnaire. Responses were coded so higher scores indicated a higher trust in science and scientists, A linear regression model including sex, age group, division, race and ethnicity, political affiliation, and history of COVID-19, was used to determine variables significantly associated with trust in science and scientists scores at the p < 0.05 level. RESULTS: Participants were mostly female (62.1%), Asian (34.7%) and White (39.5%) and students (70.6%). More than half identified their political affiliation as Democrat (65%). In the final regression model, all races and ethnicities had significantly lower mean trust in science and scientists scores than White participants [Black ([Formula: see text]= -0.42, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.43, p < 0.001); Asian ([Formula: see text]= -0.20, 95% CI: -0.24, -0.17, p < 0.001); Latinx ([Formula: see text]= -0.22, 95% CI: -0.27, -0.18, p < 0.001); Other ([Formula: see text]= -0.19, 95% CI: -0.26, -0.11, p < 0.001)]. Compared to those identifying as Democrat, all other political affiliations had significantly lower mean scores. [Republican ([Formula: see text] =-0.49, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.43, p < 0.0001); Independent ([Formula: see text] =-0.29, 95% CI: -0.33, -0.25, p < 0.0001); something else ([Formula: see text] =-0.19, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.12, p < 0.0001)]. Having had COVID-19 ([Formula: see text]= -0.10, 95% CI: -0.15, -0.06, p < 0.001) had significantly lower scores compared to those who did not have COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Despite the setting of a major research University, trust in science is highly variable. This study identifies characteristics that could be used to target and curate educational campaigns and university policies to address the COVID19 and future pandemics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10061384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100613842023-03-30 Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative Nicolo, Michele Kawaguchi, Eric Ghanem-Uzqueda, Angie Soto, Daniel Deva, Sohini Shanker, Kush Lee, Ryan Gilliland, Frank Klausner, Jeffrey D. Baezconde-Garbanati, Lourdes Kovacs, Andrea Van Orman, Sarah Hu, Howard Unger, Jennifer B. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Mistrust in science and scientists may adversely influence the rate of COVID-19 vaccination and undermine public health initiatives to reduce virus transmission. METHODS: Students, staff and faculty responded to an email invitation to complete an electronic survey. Surveys included 21-items from the Trust in Science and Scientists Inventory questionnaire. Responses were coded so higher scores indicated a higher trust in science and scientists, A linear regression model including sex, age group, division, race and ethnicity, political affiliation, and history of COVID-19, was used to determine variables significantly associated with trust in science and scientists scores at the p < 0.05 level. RESULTS: Participants were mostly female (62.1%), Asian (34.7%) and White (39.5%) and students (70.6%). More than half identified their political affiliation as Democrat (65%). In the final regression model, all races and ethnicities had significantly lower mean trust in science and scientists scores than White participants [Black ([Formula: see text]= -0.42, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.43, p < 0.001); Asian ([Formula: see text]= -0.20, 95% CI: -0.24, -0.17, p < 0.001); Latinx ([Formula: see text]= -0.22, 95% CI: -0.27, -0.18, p < 0.001); Other ([Formula: see text]= -0.19, 95% CI: -0.26, -0.11, p < 0.001)]. Compared to those identifying as Democrat, all other political affiliations had significantly lower mean scores. [Republican ([Formula: see text] =-0.49, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.43, p < 0.0001); Independent ([Formula: see text] =-0.29, 95% CI: -0.33, -0.25, p < 0.0001); something else ([Formula: see text] =-0.19, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.12, p < 0.0001)]. Having had COVID-19 ([Formula: see text]= -0.10, 95% CI: -0.15, -0.06, p < 0.001) had significantly lower scores compared to those who did not have COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Despite the setting of a major research University, trust in science is highly variable. This study identifies characteristics that could be used to target and curate educational campaigns and university policies to address the COVID19 and future pandemics. BioMed Central 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10061384/ /pubmed/36997945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15533-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nicolo, Michele
Kawaguchi, Eric
Ghanem-Uzqueda, Angie
Soto, Daniel
Deva, Sohini
Shanker, Kush
Lee, Ryan
Gilliland, Frank
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
Baezconde-Garbanati, Lourdes
Kovacs, Andrea
Van Orman, Sarah
Hu, Howard
Unger, Jennifer B.
Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative
title Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative
title_full Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative
title_fullStr Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative
title_full_unstemmed Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative
title_short Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative
title_sort trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in los angeles during the covid-19 pandemic, the trojan pandemic response initiative
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15533-x
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolomichele trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT kawaguchieric trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT ghanemuzquedaangie trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT sotodaniel trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT devasohini trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT shankerkush trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT leeryan trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT gillilandfrank trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT klausnerjeffreyd trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT baezcondegarbanatilourdes trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT kovacsandrea trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT vanormansarah trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT huhoward trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative
AT ungerjenniferb trustinscienceandscientistsamonguniversitystudentsstaffandfacultyofalargediverseuniversityinlosangelesduringthecovid19pandemicthetrojanpandemicresponseinitiative