Increased HIV Transmissions With Reduced Insurance Coverage for HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis: Potential Consequences of Braidwood Management v. Becerra

A US federal court recently ruled against requiring health insurers to cover human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) under the Affordable Care Act. For every 10% decrease in PrEP coverage resulting from this ruling among US men who have sex with men, we estimate an addition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paltiel, A David, Ahmed, Ali R, Jin, Elena Y, McNamara, Meredithe, Freedberg, Kenneth A, Neilan, Anne M, Gonsalves, Gregg S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Brief Report
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37008565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad139
Descripción
Sumario:A US federal court recently ruled against requiring health insurers to cover human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) under the Affordable Care Act. For every 10% decrease in PrEP coverage resulting from this ruling among US men who have sex with men, we estimate an additional 1140 HIV infections in the following year in that population.

Ejemplares similares