Cargando…

Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL) with saline has been widely used in surgical practice. However, the effectiveness of IOPL with saline in patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) remains controversial. This study aims to systematically review randomized controlled trials (R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Qi, Meng, Wenbo, Ren, Yanhan, Li, Qinyuan, Boermeester, Marja A., Nthumba, Peter Muli, Rickard, Jennifer, Zheng, Bobo, Liu, Hui, Shi, Qianling, Zhao, Siya, Wang, Zijun, Liu, Xiao, Luo, Zhengxiu, Yang, Kehu, Chen, Yaolong, Sawyer, Robert G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00496-6
_version_ 1785017386698539008
author Zhou, Qi
Meng, Wenbo
Ren, Yanhan
Li, Qinyuan
Boermeester, Marja A.
Nthumba, Peter Muli
Rickard, Jennifer
Zheng, Bobo
Liu, Hui
Shi, Qianling
Zhao, Siya
Wang, Zijun
Liu, Xiao
Luo, Zhengxiu
Yang, Kehu
Chen, Yaolong
Sawyer, Robert G.
author_facet Zhou, Qi
Meng, Wenbo
Ren, Yanhan
Li, Qinyuan
Boermeester, Marja A.
Nthumba, Peter Muli
Rickard, Jennifer
Zheng, Bobo
Liu, Hui
Shi, Qianling
Zhao, Siya
Wang, Zijun
Liu, Xiao
Luo, Zhengxiu
Yang, Kehu
Chen, Yaolong
Sawyer, Robert G.
author_sort Zhou, Qi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL) with saline has been widely used in surgical practice. However, the effectiveness of IOPL with saline in patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) remains controversial. This study aims to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of IOPL in patients with IAIs. METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, CNKI, WanFang, and CBM databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2022. Random-effects models were used to calculate the risk ratio (RR), mean difference, and standardized mean difference. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to rate the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Ten RCTs with 1318 participants were included, of which eight studies on appendicitis and two studies on peritonitis. Moderate-quality evidence showed that the use of IOPL with saline was not associated with a reduced risk of mortality (0% vs. 1.1%; RR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.02–6.39]), intra-abdominal abscess (12.3% vs. 11.8%; RR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.70–1.48]; I(2) = 24%), incisional surgical site infections (3.3% vs. 3.8%; RR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.18–2.86]; I(2) = 50%), postoperative complication (11.0% vs. 13.2%; RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.39–1.41]; I(2) = 64%), reoperation (2.9% vs. 1.7%; RR,1.71 [95% CI, 0.74–3.93]; I(2) = 0%) and readmission (5.2% vs. 6.6%; RR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.48–1.87]; I(2) = 7%) in patients with appendicitis when compared to non-IOPL. Low-quality evidence showed that the use of IOPL with saline was not associated with a reduced risk of mortality (22.7% vs. 23.3%; RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.45–2.09], I(2) = 0%) and intra-abdominal abscess (5.1% vs. 5.0%; RR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.16–6.98], I(2) = 0%) in patients with peritonitis when compared to non-IOPL. CONCLUSION: IOPL with saline use in patients with appendicitis was not associated with significantly decreased risk of mortality, intra-abdominal abscess, incisional surgical site infection, postoperative complication, reoperation, and readmission compared with non-IOPL. These findings do not support the routine use of IOPL with saline in patients with appendicitis. The benefits of IOPL for IAI caused by other types of abdominal infections need to be investigated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-023-00496-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10061899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100618992023-03-31 Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhou, Qi Meng, Wenbo Ren, Yanhan Li, Qinyuan Boermeester, Marja A. Nthumba, Peter Muli Rickard, Jennifer Zheng, Bobo Liu, Hui Shi, Qianling Zhao, Siya Wang, Zijun Liu, Xiao Luo, Zhengxiu Yang, Kehu Chen, Yaolong Sawyer, Robert G. World J Emerg Surg Review BACKGROUND: Intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL) with saline has been widely used in surgical practice. However, the effectiveness of IOPL with saline in patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) remains controversial. This study aims to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of IOPL in patients with IAIs. METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, CNKI, WanFang, and CBM databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2022. Random-effects models were used to calculate the risk ratio (RR), mean difference, and standardized mean difference. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to rate the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Ten RCTs with 1318 participants were included, of which eight studies on appendicitis and two studies on peritonitis. Moderate-quality evidence showed that the use of IOPL with saline was not associated with a reduced risk of mortality (0% vs. 1.1%; RR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.02–6.39]), intra-abdominal abscess (12.3% vs. 11.8%; RR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.70–1.48]; I(2) = 24%), incisional surgical site infections (3.3% vs. 3.8%; RR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.18–2.86]; I(2) = 50%), postoperative complication (11.0% vs. 13.2%; RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.39–1.41]; I(2) = 64%), reoperation (2.9% vs. 1.7%; RR,1.71 [95% CI, 0.74–3.93]; I(2) = 0%) and readmission (5.2% vs. 6.6%; RR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.48–1.87]; I(2) = 7%) in patients with appendicitis when compared to non-IOPL. Low-quality evidence showed that the use of IOPL with saline was not associated with a reduced risk of mortality (22.7% vs. 23.3%; RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.45–2.09], I(2) = 0%) and intra-abdominal abscess (5.1% vs. 5.0%; RR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.16–6.98], I(2) = 0%) in patients with peritonitis when compared to non-IOPL. CONCLUSION: IOPL with saline use in patients with appendicitis was not associated with significantly decreased risk of mortality, intra-abdominal abscess, incisional surgical site infection, postoperative complication, reoperation, and readmission compared with non-IOPL. These findings do not support the routine use of IOPL with saline in patients with appendicitis. The benefits of IOPL for IAI caused by other types of abdominal infections need to be investigated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-023-00496-6. BioMed Central 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10061899/ /pubmed/36991507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00496-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Zhou, Qi
Meng, Wenbo
Ren, Yanhan
Li, Qinyuan
Boermeester, Marja A.
Nthumba, Peter Muli
Rickard, Jennifer
Zheng, Bobo
Liu, Hui
Shi, Qianling
Zhao, Siya
Wang, Zijun
Liu, Xiao
Luo, Zhengxiu
Yang, Kehu
Chen, Yaolong
Sawyer, Robert G.
Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00496-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouqi effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mengwenbo effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT renyanhan effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liqinyuan effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT boermeestermarjaa effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nthumbapetermuli effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rickardjennifer effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhengbobo effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuhui effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shiqianling effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaosiya effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangzijun effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuxiao effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luozhengxiu effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangkehu effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenyaolong effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sawyerrobertg effectivenessofintraoperativeperitoneallavagewithsalineinpatientwithintraabdominalinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis