Cargando…
Inequality and private health insurance in Zimbabwe: history, politics and performance
INTRODUCTION: Zimbabwe has one of the highest rates of private health insurance (PHI) expenditures as a share of total health expenditures in the world. The perfomamce of PHI, known as Medical Aid Societies in Zimbabwe, requires close monitoring since market failures and weaknesses in public policy...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01868-9 |
_version_ | 1785017387709366272 |
---|---|
author | Mhazo, Alison T. Maponga, Charles C. Mossialos, Elias |
author_facet | Mhazo, Alison T. Maponga, Charles C. Mossialos, Elias |
author_sort | Mhazo, Alison T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Zimbabwe has one of the highest rates of private health insurance (PHI) expenditures as a share of total health expenditures in the world. The perfomamce of PHI, known as Medical Aid Societies in Zimbabwe, requires close monitoring since market failures and weaknesses in public policy and regulation can affect overall health system performance. Despite the considerable influence of politics (stakeholder interests) and history (past events) in shaping PHI design and implementation, these factors are frequently sidelined when analyzing PHI in Zimbabwe. This study considers the roles of history and politics in shaping PHI and determining its impact on health system performance in Zimbabwe. METHODS: We reviewed 50 sources of information using Arksey & O'Malley's (2005) methodological framework. To frame our analysis, we used a conceptual framework that integrates economic theory with political and historical aspects developed by Thomson et al. (2020) to analyze PHI in diverse contexts. RESULTS: We present a timeline of the history and politics of PHI in Zimbabwe from the 1930s to present. Zimbabwe's current PHI coverage is segmented along socio-economic lines due to a long history of elitist and exclusionary politics in coverage patterns. While PHI was considered to perform relatively well up to the mid-1990s, the economic crisis of the 2000s eroded trust among insurers, providers, and patients. That culminated in agency problems which severely lessened PHI coverage quality with concurrent deterioration in efficiency and equity-related performance dimensions. CONCLUSION: The present design and performance of PHI in Zimbabwe is primarily a function of history and politics rather than informed choice. Currently, PHI in Zimbabwe does not meet the evaluative criteria of a well-performing health insurance system. Therefore, reform efforts to expand PHI coverage or improve PHI performance must explicitly consider the relevant historical, political and economic aspects for successful reformation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10061904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100619042023-03-31 Inequality and private health insurance in Zimbabwe: history, politics and performance Mhazo, Alison T. Maponga, Charles C. Mossialos, Elias Int J Equity Health Research INTRODUCTION: Zimbabwe has one of the highest rates of private health insurance (PHI) expenditures as a share of total health expenditures in the world. The perfomamce of PHI, known as Medical Aid Societies in Zimbabwe, requires close monitoring since market failures and weaknesses in public policy and regulation can affect overall health system performance. Despite the considerable influence of politics (stakeholder interests) and history (past events) in shaping PHI design and implementation, these factors are frequently sidelined when analyzing PHI in Zimbabwe. This study considers the roles of history and politics in shaping PHI and determining its impact on health system performance in Zimbabwe. METHODS: We reviewed 50 sources of information using Arksey & O'Malley's (2005) methodological framework. To frame our analysis, we used a conceptual framework that integrates economic theory with political and historical aspects developed by Thomson et al. (2020) to analyze PHI in diverse contexts. RESULTS: We present a timeline of the history and politics of PHI in Zimbabwe from the 1930s to present. Zimbabwe's current PHI coverage is segmented along socio-economic lines due to a long history of elitist and exclusionary politics in coverage patterns. While PHI was considered to perform relatively well up to the mid-1990s, the economic crisis of the 2000s eroded trust among insurers, providers, and patients. That culminated in agency problems which severely lessened PHI coverage quality with concurrent deterioration in efficiency and equity-related performance dimensions. CONCLUSION: The present design and performance of PHI in Zimbabwe is primarily a function of history and politics rather than informed choice. Currently, PHI in Zimbabwe does not meet the evaluative criteria of a well-performing health insurance system. Therefore, reform efforts to expand PHI coverage or improve PHI performance must explicitly consider the relevant historical, political and economic aspects for successful reformation. BioMed Central 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10061904/ /pubmed/36991454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01868-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mhazo, Alison T. Maponga, Charles C. Mossialos, Elias Inequality and private health insurance in Zimbabwe: history, politics and performance |
title | Inequality and private health insurance in Zimbabwe: history, politics and performance |
title_full | Inequality and private health insurance in Zimbabwe: history, politics and performance |
title_fullStr | Inequality and private health insurance in Zimbabwe: history, politics and performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Inequality and private health insurance in Zimbabwe: history, politics and performance |
title_short | Inequality and private health insurance in Zimbabwe: history, politics and performance |
title_sort | inequality and private health insurance in zimbabwe: history, politics and performance |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01868-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mhazoalisont inequalityandprivatehealthinsuranceinzimbabwehistorypoliticsandperformance AT mapongacharlesc inequalityandprivatehealthinsuranceinzimbabwehistorypoliticsandperformance AT mossialoselias inequalityandprivatehealthinsuranceinzimbabwehistorypoliticsandperformance |