Cargando…

Comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for moderate and large benign prostatic enlargement

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate (B-TUVP) with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for moderate [prostate volume (PV) 30–80 ml] and large (≥ 80 ml) benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayashi, Yutaro, Yoneyama, Shuko, Takizawa, Akitoshi, Kobayashi, Kazuki, Ito, Hiroki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01215-8
_version_ 1785017399751213056
author Hayashi, Yutaro
Yoneyama, Shuko
Takizawa, Akitoshi
Kobayashi, Kazuki
Ito, Hiroki
author_facet Hayashi, Yutaro
Yoneyama, Shuko
Takizawa, Akitoshi
Kobayashi, Kazuki
Ito, Hiroki
author_sort Hayashi, Yutaro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate (B-TUVP) with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for moderate [prostate volume (PV) 30–80 ml] and large (≥ 80 ml) benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male patients with lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS) or urinary retention who underwent B-TUVP or HoLEP treatment in two regional centers were respectively enrolled. Patient characteristics and treatment outcomes were retrospectively compared between B-TUVP and HoLEP. RESULTS: In patients with moderate and large prostate volume,B-TUVP showed shorter operative time (P < 0.001) and less hemoglobin decrease (P < 0.001) than in HoLEP. In uncatheterised patients, voiding symptoms and patients’ quality of life improved after B-TUVP and HoLEP, but these improvement rates were consistently bigger in HoLEP than in B-TUVP. In catheterised patients, the rate of achieving catheter-free status after surgery was higher in HoLEP than in B-TUVP for patients with PV > 80 ml.(P < 0.001) The incidence of postoperative fever was higher in B-TUVP than in HoLEP for patients with PV 30–80 ml (P < 0.001) but not for those with PV > 80 ml.(P=0.08) The Incidence of postoperative stress incontinence(SUI) was higher in HoLEP than in B-TUVP for patients with moderate and large prostate volume. CONCLUSIONS: There are few studies that investigated the short-term efficacy and safety of second-generation B-TUVP in comparison with HoLEP for moderate and large BPE. Improvement in LUTS and achievement of catheter-free status were predominant in HoLEP, and these outcomes were more prominent in patients with large BPE of PV > 80 ml. However, B-TUVP resulted in less blood loss, shorter operative duration, and less SUI suggesting that B-TUVP is also well-tolerated surgical modality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-023-01215-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10061965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100619652023-03-31 Comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for moderate and large benign prostatic enlargement Hayashi, Yutaro Yoneyama, Shuko Takizawa, Akitoshi Kobayashi, Kazuki Ito, Hiroki BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate (B-TUVP) with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for moderate [prostate volume (PV) 30–80 ml] and large (≥ 80 ml) benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male patients with lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS) or urinary retention who underwent B-TUVP or HoLEP treatment in two regional centers were respectively enrolled. Patient characteristics and treatment outcomes were retrospectively compared between B-TUVP and HoLEP. RESULTS: In patients with moderate and large prostate volume,B-TUVP showed shorter operative time (P < 0.001) and less hemoglobin decrease (P < 0.001) than in HoLEP. In uncatheterised patients, voiding symptoms and patients’ quality of life improved after B-TUVP and HoLEP, but these improvement rates were consistently bigger in HoLEP than in B-TUVP. In catheterised patients, the rate of achieving catheter-free status after surgery was higher in HoLEP than in B-TUVP for patients with PV > 80 ml.(P < 0.001) The incidence of postoperative fever was higher in B-TUVP than in HoLEP for patients with PV 30–80 ml (P < 0.001) but not for those with PV > 80 ml.(P=0.08) The Incidence of postoperative stress incontinence(SUI) was higher in HoLEP than in B-TUVP for patients with moderate and large prostate volume. CONCLUSIONS: There are few studies that investigated the short-term efficacy and safety of second-generation B-TUVP in comparison with HoLEP for moderate and large BPE. Improvement in LUTS and achievement of catheter-free status were predominant in HoLEP, and these outcomes were more prominent in patients with large BPE of PV > 80 ml. However, B-TUVP resulted in less blood loss, shorter operative duration, and less SUI suggesting that B-TUVP is also well-tolerated surgical modality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-023-01215-8. BioMed Central 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10061965/ /pubmed/36991392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01215-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hayashi, Yutaro
Yoneyama, Shuko
Takizawa, Akitoshi
Kobayashi, Kazuki
Ito, Hiroki
Comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for moderate and large benign prostatic enlargement
title Comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for moderate and large benign prostatic enlargement
title_full Comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for moderate and large benign prostatic enlargement
title_fullStr Comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for moderate and large benign prostatic enlargement
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for moderate and large benign prostatic enlargement
title_short Comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for moderate and large benign prostatic enlargement
title_sort comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral electro vaporization and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for moderate and large benign prostatic enlargement
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01215-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hayashiyutaro comparisonoftheshorttermefficacyandsafetyofbipolartransurethralelectrovaporizationandholmiumlaserenucleationoftheprostateformoderateandlargebenignprostaticenlargement
AT yoneyamashuko comparisonoftheshorttermefficacyandsafetyofbipolartransurethralelectrovaporizationandholmiumlaserenucleationoftheprostateformoderateandlargebenignprostaticenlargement
AT takizawaakitoshi comparisonoftheshorttermefficacyandsafetyofbipolartransurethralelectrovaporizationandholmiumlaserenucleationoftheprostateformoderateandlargebenignprostaticenlargement
AT kobayashikazuki comparisonoftheshorttermefficacyandsafetyofbipolartransurethralelectrovaporizationandholmiumlaserenucleationoftheprostateformoderateandlargebenignprostaticenlargement
AT itohiroki comparisonoftheshorttermefficacyandsafetyofbipolartransurethralelectrovaporizationandholmiumlaserenucleationoftheprostateformoderateandlargebenignprostaticenlargement