Cargando…

Outcome and safety of intraoperative defibrillation testing during device replacement: the Simpler trial

AIMS: Intraoperative defibrillation testing (DT) during implant or replacement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has been a matter of debate for many years. This debate was put to rest by the Simple and Nordic ICD trials, and the practice of testing during new implantations has essen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milman, Anat, Nof, Eyal, Rav Acha, Moshe, Beinart, Roy, Kutyifa, Valentina, Merkely, Béla, Regev, Ehud, Biffi, Mauro, Cha, Yong-Mei, Ovdat, Tal, Klempfner, Robert, Glikson, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10062357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac282
_version_ 1785017477259853824
author Milman, Anat
Nof, Eyal
Rav Acha, Moshe
Beinart, Roy
Kutyifa, Valentina
Merkely, Béla
Regev, Ehud
Biffi, Mauro
Cha, Yong-Mei
Ovdat, Tal
Klempfner, Robert
Glikson, Michael
author_facet Milman, Anat
Nof, Eyal
Rav Acha, Moshe
Beinart, Roy
Kutyifa, Valentina
Merkely, Béla
Regev, Ehud
Biffi, Mauro
Cha, Yong-Mei
Ovdat, Tal
Klempfner, Robert
Glikson, Michael
author_sort Milman, Anat
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Intraoperative defibrillation testing (DT) during implant or replacement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has been a matter of debate for many years. This debate was put to rest by the Simple and Nordic ICD trials, and the practice of testing during new implantations has essentially been almost abandoned. Old registries demonstrated an increased incidence of significant findings in DT during replacements. The aim of the present study was to evaluate frequency of significant findings and safety of DT in subjects undergoing device replacement. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective observational multi-centre study included consecutive patients undergoing ICD generator replacement. The primary outcome was a failure to terminate induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) with a single shock 10 J below the maximal capacity of the device. Secondary outcomes included complications of DT. Patients were followed-up at 1- and 6-months post-procedure. A total of 92 patients were eligible, and consented to the study, of which 84 underwent DT during battery replacement. The median age was 68 years and 79.8% were males. Induction of VF was successful in 84 patients as was a successful conversion on the first attempt in all. There were no procedure-related complications. During follow up one patient had two appropriate ICD shock events. In four patients, ICD programming was changed. None suffered inappropriate shock. There was no evidence of lead malfunction. Two deaths occurred, none of which was related to arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: The present study found DT was not associated with complications in patients undergoing ICD generator replacement but produced no clinically important information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10062357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100623572023-03-31 Outcome and safety of intraoperative defibrillation testing during device replacement: the Simpler trial Milman, Anat Nof, Eyal Rav Acha, Moshe Beinart, Roy Kutyifa, Valentina Merkely, Béla Regev, Ehud Biffi, Mauro Cha, Yong-Mei Ovdat, Tal Klempfner, Robert Glikson, Michael Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Intraoperative defibrillation testing (DT) during implant or replacement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has been a matter of debate for many years. This debate was put to rest by the Simple and Nordic ICD trials, and the practice of testing during new implantations has essentially been almost abandoned. Old registries demonstrated an increased incidence of significant findings in DT during replacements. The aim of the present study was to evaluate frequency of significant findings and safety of DT in subjects undergoing device replacement. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective observational multi-centre study included consecutive patients undergoing ICD generator replacement. The primary outcome was a failure to terminate induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) with a single shock 10 J below the maximal capacity of the device. Secondary outcomes included complications of DT. Patients were followed-up at 1- and 6-months post-procedure. A total of 92 patients were eligible, and consented to the study, of which 84 underwent DT during battery replacement. The median age was 68 years and 79.8% were males. Induction of VF was successful in 84 patients as was a successful conversion on the first attempt in all. There were no procedure-related complications. During follow up one patient had two appropriate ICD shock events. In four patients, ICD programming was changed. None suffered inappropriate shock. There was no evidence of lead malfunction. Two deaths occurred, none of which was related to arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: The present study found DT was not associated with complications in patients undergoing ICD generator replacement but produced no clinically important information. Oxford University Press 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10062357/ /pubmed/36636968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac282 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Milman, Anat
Nof, Eyal
Rav Acha, Moshe
Beinart, Roy
Kutyifa, Valentina
Merkely, Béla
Regev, Ehud
Biffi, Mauro
Cha, Yong-Mei
Ovdat, Tal
Klempfner, Robert
Glikson, Michael
Outcome and safety of intraoperative defibrillation testing during device replacement: the Simpler trial
title Outcome and safety of intraoperative defibrillation testing during device replacement: the Simpler trial
title_full Outcome and safety of intraoperative defibrillation testing during device replacement: the Simpler trial
title_fullStr Outcome and safety of intraoperative defibrillation testing during device replacement: the Simpler trial
title_full_unstemmed Outcome and safety of intraoperative defibrillation testing during device replacement: the Simpler trial
title_short Outcome and safety of intraoperative defibrillation testing during device replacement: the Simpler trial
title_sort outcome and safety of intraoperative defibrillation testing during device replacement: the simpler trial
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10062357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac282
work_keys_str_mv AT milmananat outcomeandsafetyofintraoperativedefibrillationtestingduringdevicereplacementthesimplertrial
AT nofeyal outcomeandsafetyofintraoperativedefibrillationtestingduringdevicereplacementthesimplertrial
AT ravachamoshe outcomeandsafetyofintraoperativedefibrillationtestingduringdevicereplacementthesimplertrial
AT beinartroy outcomeandsafetyofintraoperativedefibrillationtestingduringdevicereplacementthesimplertrial
AT kutyifavalentina outcomeandsafetyofintraoperativedefibrillationtestingduringdevicereplacementthesimplertrial
AT merkelybela outcomeandsafetyofintraoperativedefibrillationtestingduringdevicereplacementthesimplertrial
AT regevehud outcomeandsafetyofintraoperativedefibrillationtestingduringdevicereplacementthesimplertrial
AT biffimauro outcomeandsafetyofintraoperativedefibrillationtestingduringdevicereplacementthesimplertrial
AT chayongmei outcomeandsafetyofintraoperativedefibrillationtestingduringdevicereplacementthesimplertrial
AT ovdattal outcomeandsafetyofintraoperativedefibrillationtestingduringdevicereplacementthesimplertrial
AT klempfnerrobert outcomeandsafetyofintraoperativedefibrillationtestingduringdevicereplacementthesimplertrial
AT gliksonmichael outcomeandsafetyofintraoperativedefibrillationtestingduringdevicereplacementthesimplertrial