Cargando…

Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups

AIMS: This study compares clinical outcomes between leadless pacemakers (leadless-VVI) and transvenous ventricular pacemakers (transvenous ventricular permanent-VVI) in subgroups of patients at higher risk of pacemaker complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is based on the Micra Coverage wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boveda, Serge, Higuera, Lucas, Longacre, Colleen, Wolff, Claudia, Wherry, Kael, Stromberg, Kurt, El-Chami, Mikhael F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10062361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36757859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad016
_version_ 1785017478241320960
author Boveda, Serge
Higuera, Lucas
Longacre, Colleen
Wolff, Claudia
Wherry, Kael
Stromberg, Kurt
El-Chami, Mikhael F
author_facet Boveda, Serge
Higuera, Lucas
Longacre, Colleen
Wolff, Claudia
Wherry, Kael
Stromberg, Kurt
El-Chami, Mikhael F
author_sort Boveda, Serge
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study compares clinical outcomes between leadless pacemakers (leadless-VVI) and transvenous ventricular pacemakers (transvenous ventricular permanent-VVI) in subgroups of patients at higher risk of pacemaker complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is based on the Micra Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) study. Patients from the Micra CED study were considered in a high-risk subgroup if they had a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease Stages 4–5 (CKD45), end-stage renal disease, malignancy, diabetes, tricuspid valve disease (TVD), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 12 months prior to pacemaker implant. A pre-specified set of complications and reinterventions were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes. Competing risks models were used to compare reinterventions and complications between leadless-VVI and transvenous-VVI patients within each subgroup; results were adjusted for multiple comparisons. A post hoc comparison of a composite outcome of reinterventions and device complications was conducted. Out of 27 991 patients, 9858 leadless-VVI and 12 157 transvenous-VVI patients have at least one high-risk comorbidity. Compared to transvenous-VVI patients, leadless-VVI patients in four subgroups [malignancy, HR 0.68 (0.48–0.95); diabetes, HR 0.69 (0.53–0.89); TVD, HR 0.60 (0.44–0.82); COPD, HR 0.73 (0.55–0.98)] had fewer complications, in three subgroups [diabetes, HR 0.58 (0.37–0.89); TVD, HR 0.46 (0.28–0.76); COPD, HR 0.51 (0.29–0.90)) had fewer reinterventions, and in four subgroups (malignancy, HR 0.52 (0.32–0.83); diabetes, HR 0.52 (0.35–0.77); TVD, HR 0.44 (0.28–0.70); COPD, HR 0.55 (0.34–0.89)] had lower rates of the combined outcome. CONCLUSION: In a real-world study, leadless pacemaker patients had lower 2-year complications and reinterventions rates compared with transvenous-VVI pacing in several high-risk subgroups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03039712
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10062361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100623612023-03-31 Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups Boveda, Serge Higuera, Lucas Longacre, Colleen Wolff, Claudia Wherry, Kael Stromberg, Kurt El-Chami, Mikhael F Europace Clinical Research AIMS: This study compares clinical outcomes between leadless pacemakers (leadless-VVI) and transvenous ventricular pacemakers (transvenous ventricular permanent-VVI) in subgroups of patients at higher risk of pacemaker complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is based on the Micra Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) study. Patients from the Micra CED study were considered in a high-risk subgroup if they had a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease Stages 4–5 (CKD45), end-stage renal disease, malignancy, diabetes, tricuspid valve disease (TVD), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 12 months prior to pacemaker implant. A pre-specified set of complications and reinterventions were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes. Competing risks models were used to compare reinterventions and complications between leadless-VVI and transvenous-VVI patients within each subgroup; results were adjusted for multiple comparisons. A post hoc comparison of a composite outcome of reinterventions and device complications was conducted. Out of 27 991 patients, 9858 leadless-VVI and 12 157 transvenous-VVI patients have at least one high-risk comorbidity. Compared to transvenous-VVI patients, leadless-VVI patients in four subgroups [malignancy, HR 0.68 (0.48–0.95); diabetes, HR 0.69 (0.53–0.89); TVD, HR 0.60 (0.44–0.82); COPD, HR 0.73 (0.55–0.98)] had fewer complications, in three subgroups [diabetes, HR 0.58 (0.37–0.89); TVD, HR 0.46 (0.28–0.76); COPD, HR 0.51 (0.29–0.90)) had fewer reinterventions, and in four subgroups (malignancy, HR 0.52 (0.32–0.83); diabetes, HR 0.52 (0.35–0.77); TVD, HR 0.44 (0.28–0.70); COPD, HR 0.55 (0.34–0.89)] had lower rates of the combined outcome. CONCLUSION: In a real-world study, leadless pacemaker patients had lower 2-year complications and reinterventions rates compared with transvenous-VVI pacing in several high-risk subgroups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03039712 Oxford University Press 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10062361/ /pubmed/36757859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad016 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Boveda, Serge
Higuera, Lucas
Longacre, Colleen
Wolff, Claudia
Wherry, Kael
Stromberg, Kurt
El-Chami, Mikhael F
Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups
title Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups
title_full Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups
title_fullStr Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups
title_full_unstemmed Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups
title_short Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups
title_sort two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10062361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36757859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad016
work_keys_str_mv AT bovedaserge twoyearoutcomesofleadlessvstransvenoussinglechamberventricularpacemakerinhighrisksubgroups
AT higueralucas twoyearoutcomesofleadlessvstransvenoussinglechamberventricularpacemakerinhighrisksubgroups
AT longacrecolleen twoyearoutcomesofleadlessvstransvenoussinglechamberventricularpacemakerinhighrisksubgroups
AT wolffclaudia twoyearoutcomesofleadlessvstransvenoussinglechamberventricularpacemakerinhighrisksubgroups
AT wherrykael twoyearoutcomesofleadlessvstransvenoussinglechamberventricularpacemakerinhighrisksubgroups
AT strombergkurt twoyearoutcomesofleadlessvstransvenoussinglechamberventricularpacemakerinhighrisksubgroups
AT elchamimikhaelf twoyearoutcomesofleadlessvstransvenoussinglechamberventricularpacemakerinhighrisksubgroups