Cargando…
Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Guidelines recommend patients undergoing a first pacemaker implant who have even mild left ventricular (LV) impairment should receive biventricular or conduction system pacing (CSP). There is no corresponding recommendation for patients who already have a pacemaker. We conducted a meta-analysis of r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10062368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac188 |
_version_ | 1785017479988248576 |
---|---|
author | Kaza, Nandita Htun, Varanand Miyazawa, Alejandra Simader, Florentina Porter, Bradley Howard, James P Arnold, Ahran D Naraen, Akriti Luria, David Glikson, Michael Israel, Carsten Francis, Darrel P Whinnett, Zachary I Shun-Shin, Matthew J Keene, Daniel |
author_facet | Kaza, Nandita Htun, Varanand Miyazawa, Alejandra Simader, Florentina Porter, Bradley Howard, James P Arnold, Ahran D Naraen, Akriti Luria, David Glikson, Michael Israel, Carsten Francis, Darrel P Whinnett, Zachary I Shun-Shin, Matthew J Keene, Daniel |
author_sort | Kaza, Nandita |
collection | PubMed |
description | Guidelines recommend patients undergoing a first pacemaker implant who have even mild left ventricular (LV) impairment should receive biventricular or conduction system pacing (CSP). There is no corresponding recommendation for patients who already have a pacemaker. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing device upgrades. The primary outcome was the echocardiographic change in LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Six RCTs (randomizing 161 patients) and 47 observational studies (2644 patients) assessing the efficacy of upgrade to biventricular pacing were eligible for analysis. Eight observational studies recruiting 217 patients of CSP upgrade were also eligible. Fourteen additional studies contributed data on complications (25 412 patients). Randomized controlled trials of biventricular pacing upgrade showed LVEF improvement of +8.4% from 35.5% and observational studies: +8.4% from 25.7%. Observational studies of left bundle branch area pacing upgrade showed +11.1% improvement from 39.0% and observational studies of His bundle pacing upgrade showed +12.7% improvement from 36.0%. New York Heart Association class decreased by −0.4, −0.8, −1.0, and −1.2, respectively. Randomized controlled trials of biventricular upgrade found improvement in Minnesota Heart Failure Score (−6.9 points) and peak oxygen uptake (+1.1 mL/kg/min). This was also seen in observational studies of biventricular upgrades (−19.67 points and +2.63 mL/kg/min, respectively). In studies of the biventricular upgrade, complication rates averaged 2% for pneumothorax, 1.4% for tamponade, and 3.7% for infection over 24 months of mean follow-up. Lead-related complications occurred in 3.3% of biventricular upgrades and 1.8% of CSP upgrades. Randomized controlled trials show significant physiological and symptomatic benefits of upgrading pacemakers to biventricular pacing. Observational studies show similar effects between biventricular pacing upgrade and CSP upgrade. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10062368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100623682023-03-31 Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis Kaza, Nandita Htun, Varanand Miyazawa, Alejandra Simader, Florentina Porter, Bradley Howard, James P Arnold, Ahran D Naraen, Akriti Luria, David Glikson, Michael Israel, Carsten Francis, Darrel P Whinnett, Zachary I Shun-Shin, Matthew J Keene, Daniel Europace Review Guidelines recommend patients undergoing a first pacemaker implant who have even mild left ventricular (LV) impairment should receive biventricular or conduction system pacing (CSP). There is no corresponding recommendation for patients who already have a pacemaker. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing device upgrades. The primary outcome was the echocardiographic change in LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Six RCTs (randomizing 161 patients) and 47 observational studies (2644 patients) assessing the efficacy of upgrade to biventricular pacing were eligible for analysis. Eight observational studies recruiting 217 patients of CSP upgrade were also eligible. Fourteen additional studies contributed data on complications (25 412 patients). Randomized controlled trials of biventricular pacing upgrade showed LVEF improvement of +8.4% from 35.5% and observational studies: +8.4% from 25.7%. Observational studies of left bundle branch area pacing upgrade showed +11.1% improvement from 39.0% and observational studies of His bundle pacing upgrade showed +12.7% improvement from 36.0%. New York Heart Association class decreased by −0.4, −0.8, −1.0, and −1.2, respectively. Randomized controlled trials of biventricular upgrade found improvement in Minnesota Heart Failure Score (−6.9 points) and peak oxygen uptake (+1.1 mL/kg/min). This was also seen in observational studies of biventricular upgrades (−19.67 points and +2.63 mL/kg/min, respectively). In studies of the biventricular upgrade, complication rates averaged 2% for pneumothorax, 1.4% for tamponade, and 3.7% for infection over 24 months of mean follow-up. Lead-related complications occurred in 3.3% of biventricular upgrades and 1.8% of CSP upgrades. Randomized controlled trials show significant physiological and symptomatic benefits of upgrading pacemakers to biventricular pacing. Observational studies show similar effects between biventricular pacing upgrade and CSP upgrade. Oxford University Press 2022-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10062368/ /pubmed/36352513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac188 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Review Kaza, Nandita Htun, Varanand Miyazawa, Alejandra Simader, Florentina Porter, Bradley Howard, James P Arnold, Ahran D Naraen, Akriti Luria, David Glikson, Michael Israel, Carsten Francis, Darrel P Whinnett, Zachary I Shun-Shin, Matthew J Keene, Daniel Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10062368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kazanandita upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT htunvaranand upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT miyazawaalejandra upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT simaderflorentina upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT porterbradley upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT howardjamesp upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT arnoldahrand upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT naraenakriti upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luriadavid upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gliksonmichael upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT israelcarsten upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT francisdarrelp upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT whinnettzacharyi upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shunshinmatthewj upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT keenedaniel upgradingrightventricularpacemakerstobiventricularpacingorconductionsystempacingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |