Cargando…
A Comparison of Tip-Apex Distance at Various Angles of Fixation Devices in Hip Fractures
Background Intertrochanteric neck of the femur (NOF) fractures are very common, and the majority are fixed using dynamic hip screws (DHS) or intramedullary (IM) nails with a fixed angle. The aim of this study was to assess which angle of fixation has a better tip-apex distance (TAD) on X-ray and low...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37007419 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35576 |
_version_ | 1785017667599466496 |
---|---|
author | Ali, Mohammed Al-Dadah, Oday |
author_facet | Ali, Mohammed Al-Dadah, Oday |
author_sort | Ali, Mohammed |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Intertrochanteric neck of the femur (NOF) fractures are very common, and the majority are fixed using dynamic hip screws (DHS) or intramedullary (IM) nails with a fixed angle. The aim of this study was to assess which angle of fixation has a better tip-apex distance (TAD) on X-ray and lower complication rates. Methods We included patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures fixed using a DHS or an IM nail. We included patients who had complete radiological and clinical records and a minimum follow-up of 24 months. We measured the TAD and recorded the number of implant cutouts, fracture site nonunions, and periprosthetic fractures. Results A total of 107 patients were included, 35 IM nails and 72 DHS. There were four cases of implant cutouts within the DHS group and none in the IM nail group. All four cutout cases were fixed using 135° angle DHS, and two had TAD of more than 25 mm. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the implant fixation device (p=0.002) and the angle of fixation (p<0.001) are the most important predictors of TAD. Conclusion Smaller angle (130° or 125°) fixation devices allow better positioning of the lag screw and consequently better TAD, which leads to a lower probability of implant cutout in patients undergoing fracture of the neck of the femur surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10063235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100632352023-03-31 A Comparison of Tip-Apex Distance at Various Angles of Fixation Devices in Hip Fractures Ali, Mohammed Al-Dadah, Oday Cureus Orthopedics Background Intertrochanteric neck of the femur (NOF) fractures are very common, and the majority are fixed using dynamic hip screws (DHS) or intramedullary (IM) nails with a fixed angle. The aim of this study was to assess which angle of fixation has a better tip-apex distance (TAD) on X-ray and lower complication rates. Methods We included patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures fixed using a DHS or an IM nail. We included patients who had complete radiological and clinical records and a minimum follow-up of 24 months. We measured the TAD and recorded the number of implant cutouts, fracture site nonunions, and periprosthetic fractures. Results A total of 107 patients were included, 35 IM nails and 72 DHS. There were four cases of implant cutouts within the DHS group and none in the IM nail group. All four cutout cases were fixed using 135° angle DHS, and two had TAD of more than 25 mm. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the implant fixation device (p=0.002) and the angle of fixation (p<0.001) are the most important predictors of TAD. Conclusion Smaller angle (130° or 125°) fixation devices allow better positioning of the lag screw and consequently better TAD, which leads to a lower probability of implant cutout in patients undergoing fracture of the neck of the femur surgery. Cureus 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10063235/ /pubmed/37007419 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35576 Text en Copyright © 2023, Ali et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Orthopedics Ali, Mohammed Al-Dadah, Oday A Comparison of Tip-Apex Distance at Various Angles of Fixation Devices in Hip Fractures |
title | A Comparison of Tip-Apex Distance at Various Angles of Fixation Devices in Hip Fractures |
title_full | A Comparison of Tip-Apex Distance at Various Angles of Fixation Devices in Hip Fractures |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Tip-Apex Distance at Various Angles of Fixation Devices in Hip Fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Tip-Apex Distance at Various Angles of Fixation Devices in Hip Fractures |
title_short | A Comparison of Tip-Apex Distance at Various Angles of Fixation Devices in Hip Fractures |
title_sort | comparison of tip-apex distance at various angles of fixation devices in hip fractures |
topic | Orthopedics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37007419 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35576 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alimohammed acomparisonoftipapexdistanceatvariousanglesoffixationdevicesinhipfractures AT aldadahoday acomparisonoftipapexdistanceatvariousanglesoffixationdevicesinhipfractures AT alimohammed comparisonoftipapexdistanceatvariousanglesoffixationdevicesinhipfractures AT aldadahoday comparisonoftipapexdistanceatvariousanglesoffixationdevicesinhipfractures |