Cargando…

Inanspruchnahme von Palliativversorgung am Lebensende in Deutschland: zeitlicher Verlauf (2016–2019) und regionale Variabilität

BACKGROUND: In Germany, palliative care (PC) is provided on a homecare, inpatient, general, and specialized basis. Since little is currently known about the temporal course and regional differences in the forms of care, the present study was aimed to investigate this. METHOD: In a retrospective rout...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ditscheid, Bianka, Meissner, Franziska, Gebel, Cordula, Hennig, Beata, Marschall, Ursula, Meißner, Winfried, Wedding, Ulrich, Freytag, Antje
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36897332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-023-03683-7
_version_ 1785017721273974784
author Ditscheid, Bianka
Meissner, Franziska
Gebel, Cordula
Hennig, Beata
Marschall, Ursula
Meißner, Winfried
Wedding, Ulrich
Freytag, Antje
author_facet Ditscheid, Bianka
Meissner, Franziska
Gebel, Cordula
Hennig, Beata
Marschall, Ursula
Meißner, Winfried
Wedding, Ulrich
Freytag, Antje
author_sort Ditscheid, Bianka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Germany, palliative care (PC) is provided on a homecare, inpatient, general, and specialized basis. Since little is currently known about the temporal course and regional differences in the forms of care, the present study was aimed to investigate this. METHOD: In a retrospective routine data study with 417,405 BARMER-insured persons who died between 2016 and 2019, we determined the utilization rates of primary PC (PPC), specially qualified and coordinated palliative homecare (PPC+), specialized palliative homecare (SPHC), inpatient PC, and hospice care on the basis of services billed at least once in the last year of life. We calculated time trends and regional variability and controlled for needs-related patient characteristics and access-related county of community characteristics. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2019, total PC increased from 33.8 to 36.2%, SPHC from 13.3 to 16.0% (max: Rhineland-Palatinate), and inpatient PC from 8.9 to 9.9% (max: Thuringia). PPC decreased from 25.8 to 23.9% (min: Brandenburg) and PPC+ came in at 4.4% (max: Saarland) in 2019. Hospice care remained constant at 3.4%. Regional variability in utilization rates remained high, increased for PPC and inpatient PC from 2016 to 2019, and decreased for SPHC and hospice care. The regional differences were also evident after adjustment. CONCLUSION: Increasingly more SPHC, less PPC, and high regional variability, which cannot be explained by demand- or access-related characteristics, indicate that the use of PC forms is oriented less to demand than to regionally available care capacities. In view of the growing need for palliative care due to demographic factors and decreasing personnel resources, this development must be viewed critically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10063517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100635172023-04-01 Inanspruchnahme von Palliativversorgung am Lebensende in Deutschland: zeitlicher Verlauf (2016–2019) und regionale Variabilität Ditscheid, Bianka Meissner, Franziska Gebel, Cordula Hennig, Beata Marschall, Ursula Meißner, Winfried Wedding, Ulrich Freytag, Antje Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz Originalien und Übersichten BACKGROUND: In Germany, palliative care (PC) is provided on a homecare, inpatient, general, and specialized basis. Since little is currently known about the temporal course and regional differences in the forms of care, the present study was aimed to investigate this. METHOD: In a retrospective routine data study with 417,405 BARMER-insured persons who died between 2016 and 2019, we determined the utilization rates of primary PC (PPC), specially qualified and coordinated palliative homecare (PPC+), specialized palliative homecare (SPHC), inpatient PC, and hospice care on the basis of services billed at least once in the last year of life. We calculated time trends and regional variability and controlled for needs-related patient characteristics and access-related county of community characteristics. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2019, total PC increased from 33.8 to 36.2%, SPHC from 13.3 to 16.0% (max: Rhineland-Palatinate), and inpatient PC from 8.9 to 9.9% (max: Thuringia). PPC decreased from 25.8 to 23.9% (min: Brandenburg) and PPC+ came in at 4.4% (max: Saarland) in 2019. Hospice care remained constant at 3.4%. Regional variability in utilization rates remained high, increased for PPC and inpatient PC from 2016 to 2019, and decreased for SPHC and hospice care. The regional differences were also evident after adjustment. CONCLUSION: Increasingly more SPHC, less PPC, and high regional variability, which cannot be explained by demand- or access-related characteristics, indicate that the use of PC forms is oriented less to demand than to regionally available care capacities. In view of the growing need for palliative care due to demographic factors and decreasing personnel resources, this development must be viewed critically. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10063517/ /pubmed/36897332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-023-03683-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Originalien und Übersichten
Ditscheid, Bianka
Meissner, Franziska
Gebel, Cordula
Hennig, Beata
Marschall, Ursula
Meißner, Winfried
Wedding, Ulrich
Freytag, Antje
Inanspruchnahme von Palliativversorgung am Lebensende in Deutschland: zeitlicher Verlauf (2016–2019) und regionale Variabilität
title Inanspruchnahme von Palliativversorgung am Lebensende in Deutschland: zeitlicher Verlauf (2016–2019) und regionale Variabilität
title_full Inanspruchnahme von Palliativversorgung am Lebensende in Deutschland: zeitlicher Verlauf (2016–2019) und regionale Variabilität
title_fullStr Inanspruchnahme von Palliativversorgung am Lebensende in Deutschland: zeitlicher Verlauf (2016–2019) und regionale Variabilität
title_full_unstemmed Inanspruchnahme von Palliativversorgung am Lebensende in Deutschland: zeitlicher Verlauf (2016–2019) und regionale Variabilität
title_short Inanspruchnahme von Palliativversorgung am Lebensende in Deutschland: zeitlicher Verlauf (2016–2019) und regionale Variabilität
title_sort inanspruchnahme von palliativversorgung am lebensende in deutschland: zeitlicher verlauf (2016–2019) und regionale variabilität
topic Originalien und Übersichten
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36897332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-023-03683-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ditscheidbianka inanspruchnahmevonpalliativversorgungamlebensendeindeutschlandzeitlicherverlauf20162019undregionalevariabilitat
AT meissnerfranziska inanspruchnahmevonpalliativversorgungamlebensendeindeutschlandzeitlicherverlauf20162019undregionalevariabilitat
AT gebelcordula inanspruchnahmevonpalliativversorgungamlebensendeindeutschlandzeitlicherverlauf20162019undregionalevariabilitat
AT hennigbeata inanspruchnahmevonpalliativversorgungamlebensendeindeutschlandzeitlicherverlauf20162019undregionalevariabilitat
AT marschallursula inanspruchnahmevonpalliativversorgungamlebensendeindeutschlandzeitlicherverlauf20162019undregionalevariabilitat
AT meißnerwinfried inanspruchnahmevonpalliativversorgungamlebensendeindeutschlandzeitlicherverlauf20162019undregionalevariabilitat
AT weddingulrich inanspruchnahmevonpalliativversorgungamlebensendeindeutschlandzeitlicherverlauf20162019undregionalevariabilitat
AT freytagantje inanspruchnahmevonpalliativversorgungamlebensendeindeutschlandzeitlicherverlauf20162019undregionalevariabilitat