Cargando…
Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs
Determining the severity of dental crowding and the necessity of tooth extraction for orthodontic treatment planning are time-consuming processes and there are no firm criteria. Thus, automated assistance would be useful to clinicians. This study aimed to construct and evaluate artificial intelligen...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32514-7 |
_version_ | 1785017735084769280 |
---|---|
author | Ryu, Jiho Kim, Ye-Hyun Kim, Tae-Woo Jung, Seok-Ki |
author_facet | Ryu, Jiho Kim, Ye-Hyun Kim, Tae-Woo Jung, Seok-Ki |
author_sort | Ryu, Jiho |
collection | PubMed |
description | Determining the severity of dental crowding and the necessity of tooth extraction for orthodontic treatment planning are time-consuming processes and there are no firm criteria. Thus, automated assistance would be useful to clinicians. This study aimed to construct and evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) systems to assist with such treatment planning. A total of 3,136 orthodontic occlusal photographs with annotations by two orthodontists were obtained. Four convolutional neural network (CNN) models, namely ResNet50, ResNet101, VGG16, and VGG19, were adopted for the AI process. Using the intraoral photographs as input, the crowding group and the necessity of tooth extraction were obtained. Arch length discrepancy analysis with AI-detected landmarks was used for crowding categorization. Various statistical and visual analyses were conducted to evaluate the performance. The maxillary and mandibular VGG19 models showed minimum mean errors of 0.84 mm and 1.06 mm for teeth landmark detection, respectively. Analysis of Cohen’s weighted kappa coefficient indicated that crowding categorization performance was best in VGG19 (0.73), decreasing in the order of VGG16, ResNet101, and ResNet50. For tooth extraction, the maxillary VGG19 model showed the highest accuracy (0.922) and AUC (0.961). By utilizing deep learning with orthodontic photographs, dental crowding categorization and diagnosis of orthodontic extraction were successfully determined. This suggests that AI can assist clinicians in the diagnosis and decision making of treatment plans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10063582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100635822023-04-01 Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs Ryu, Jiho Kim, Ye-Hyun Kim, Tae-Woo Jung, Seok-Ki Sci Rep Article Determining the severity of dental crowding and the necessity of tooth extraction for orthodontic treatment planning are time-consuming processes and there are no firm criteria. Thus, automated assistance would be useful to clinicians. This study aimed to construct and evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) systems to assist with such treatment planning. A total of 3,136 orthodontic occlusal photographs with annotations by two orthodontists were obtained. Four convolutional neural network (CNN) models, namely ResNet50, ResNet101, VGG16, and VGG19, were adopted for the AI process. Using the intraoral photographs as input, the crowding group and the necessity of tooth extraction were obtained. Arch length discrepancy analysis with AI-detected landmarks was used for crowding categorization. Various statistical and visual analyses were conducted to evaluate the performance. The maxillary and mandibular VGG19 models showed minimum mean errors of 0.84 mm and 1.06 mm for teeth landmark detection, respectively. Analysis of Cohen’s weighted kappa coefficient indicated that crowding categorization performance was best in VGG19 (0.73), decreasing in the order of VGG16, ResNet101, and ResNet50. For tooth extraction, the maxillary VGG19 model showed the highest accuracy (0.922) and AUC (0.961). By utilizing deep learning with orthodontic photographs, dental crowding categorization and diagnosis of orthodontic extraction were successfully determined. This suggests that AI can assist clinicians in the diagnosis and decision making of treatment plans. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10063582/ /pubmed/36997621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32514-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Ryu, Jiho Kim, Ye-Hyun Kim, Tae-Woo Jung, Seok-Ki Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs |
title | Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs |
title_full | Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs |
title_short | Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs |
title_sort | evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32514-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryujiho evaluationofartificialintelligencemodelforcrowdingcategorizationandextractiondiagnosisusingintraoralphotographs AT kimyehyun evaluationofartificialintelligencemodelforcrowdingcategorizationandextractiondiagnosisusingintraoralphotographs AT kimtaewoo evaluationofartificialintelligencemodelforcrowdingcategorizationandextractiondiagnosisusingintraoralphotographs AT jungseokki evaluationofartificialintelligencemodelforcrowdingcategorizationandextractiondiagnosisusingintraoralphotographs |