Cargando…

Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs

Determining the severity of dental crowding and the necessity of tooth extraction for orthodontic treatment planning are time-consuming processes and there are no firm criteria. Thus, automated assistance would be useful to clinicians. This study aimed to construct and evaluate artificial intelligen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryu, Jiho, Kim, Ye-Hyun, Kim, Tae-Woo, Jung, Seok-Ki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32514-7
_version_ 1785017735084769280
author Ryu, Jiho
Kim, Ye-Hyun
Kim, Tae-Woo
Jung, Seok-Ki
author_facet Ryu, Jiho
Kim, Ye-Hyun
Kim, Tae-Woo
Jung, Seok-Ki
author_sort Ryu, Jiho
collection PubMed
description Determining the severity of dental crowding and the necessity of tooth extraction for orthodontic treatment planning are time-consuming processes and there are no firm criteria. Thus, automated assistance would be useful to clinicians. This study aimed to construct and evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) systems to assist with such treatment planning. A total of 3,136 orthodontic occlusal photographs with annotations by two orthodontists were obtained. Four convolutional neural network (CNN) models, namely ResNet50, ResNet101, VGG16, and VGG19, were adopted for the AI process. Using the intraoral photographs as input, the crowding group and the necessity of tooth extraction were obtained. Arch length discrepancy analysis with AI-detected landmarks was used for crowding categorization. Various statistical and visual analyses were conducted to evaluate the performance. The maxillary and mandibular VGG19 models showed minimum mean errors of 0.84 mm and 1.06 mm for teeth landmark detection, respectively. Analysis of Cohen’s weighted kappa coefficient indicated that crowding categorization performance was best in VGG19 (0.73), decreasing in the order of VGG16, ResNet101, and ResNet50. For tooth extraction, the maxillary VGG19 model showed the highest accuracy (0.922) and AUC (0.961). By utilizing deep learning with orthodontic photographs, dental crowding categorization and diagnosis of orthodontic extraction were successfully determined. This suggests that AI can assist clinicians in the diagnosis and decision making of treatment plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10063582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100635822023-04-01 Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs Ryu, Jiho Kim, Ye-Hyun Kim, Tae-Woo Jung, Seok-Ki Sci Rep Article Determining the severity of dental crowding and the necessity of tooth extraction for orthodontic treatment planning are time-consuming processes and there are no firm criteria. Thus, automated assistance would be useful to clinicians. This study aimed to construct and evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) systems to assist with such treatment planning. A total of 3,136 orthodontic occlusal photographs with annotations by two orthodontists were obtained. Four convolutional neural network (CNN) models, namely ResNet50, ResNet101, VGG16, and VGG19, were adopted for the AI process. Using the intraoral photographs as input, the crowding group and the necessity of tooth extraction were obtained. Arch length discrepancy analysis with AI-detected landmarks was used for crowding categorization. Various statistical and visual analyses were conducted to evaluate the performance. The maxillary and mandibular VGG19 models showed minimum mean errors of 0.84 mm and 1.06 mm for teeth landmark detection, respectively. Analysis of Cohen’s weighted kappa coefficient indicated that crowding categorization performance was best in VGG19 (0.73), decreasing in the order of VGG16, ResNet101, and ResNet50. For tooth extraction, the maxillary VGG19 model showed the highest accuracy (0.922) and AUC (0.961). By utilizing deep learning with orthodontic photographs, dental crowding categorization and diagnosis of orthodontic extraction were successfully determined. This suggests that AI can assist clinicians in the diagnosis and decision making of treatment plans. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10063582/ /pubmed/36997621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32514-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ryu, Jiho
Kim, Ye-Hyun
Kim, Tae-Woo
Jung, Seok-Ki
Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs
title Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs
title_full Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs
title_fullStr Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs
title_short Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs
title_sort evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32514-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ryujiho evaluationofartificialintelligencemodelforcrowdingcategorizationandextractiondiagnosisusingintraoralphotographs
AT kimyehyun evaluationofartificialintelligencemodelforcrowdingcategorizationandextractiondiagnosisusingintraoralphotographs
AT kimtaewoo evaluationofartificialintelligencemodelforcrowdingcategorizationandextractiondiagnosisusingintraoralphotographs
AT jungseokki evaluationofartificialintelligencemodelforcrowdingcategorizationandextractiondiagnosisusingintraoralphotographs