Cargando…
A biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens
PURPOSE: Robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has seen a rapid increase in utilization with recent literature suggesting that implant accuracy and resection are better optimized than in conventional TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of robotic-assisted vers...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36995538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00587-y |
_version_ | 1785017763881811968 |
---|---|
author | Sequeira, Sean B. Duvall, Grant T. Boucher, Henry |
author_facet | Sequeira, Sean B. Duvall, Grant T. Boucher, Henry |
author_sort | Sequeira, Sean B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has seen a rapid increase in utilization with recent literature suggesting that implant accuracy and resection are better optimized than in conventional TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of robotic-assisted versus conventional TKA in minimizing biplanar femoral and tibial resection error in cadaveric specimens. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching through PubMed, Cochrane library, and Embase to identify studies that analyzed the biomechanical properties of robotic assisted and conventional TKA, according to standard PRISMA guidelines. Evaluated outcomes included femoral coronal resection error (deg), femoral sagittal resection error (deg), tibial coronal resection error (deg), and tibial sagittal resection error (deg). RESULTS: Seven studies met inclusion criteria, including a total of 140 cadaveric specimens (robotic: 70, conventional: 70), for resection accuracy between robotic and conventional TKA. Pooled analysis from seven studies revealed a significant difference in femoral coronal and sagittal resection error in favor of robotic systems compared to conventional systems (p < 0.001 & p < 0.001, respectively). The pooled analysis from seven studies revealed a significant difference in tibial sagittal resection error in favor of robotic systems compared to conventional systems following TKA (p = 0.012). Posthoc power analysis revealed a power of 87.2%. CONCLUSION: The use of robotic TKA is associated with lower femoral coronal, lower femoral sagittal and tibial sagittal resection error compared to conventional TKA. It should be noted that these findings are purely biomechanical – surgeons should interpret these findings along with clinical differences between conventional and robotic systems to determine which system is best for each patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10063757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100637572023-04-01 A biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens Sequeira, Sean B. Duvall, Grant T. Boucher, Henry J Exp Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: Robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has seen a rapid increase in utilization with recent literature suggesting that implant accuracy and resection are better optimized than in conventional TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of robotic-assisted versus conventional TKA in minimizing biplanar femoral and tibial resection error in cadaveric specimens. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching through PubMed, Cochrane library, and Embase to identify studies that analyzed the biomechanical properties of robotic assisted and conventional TKA, according to standard PRISMA guidelines. Evaluated outcomes included femoral coronal resection error (deg), femoral sagittal resection error (deg), tibial coronal resection error (deg), and tibial sagittal resection error (deg). RESULTS: Seven studies met inclusion criteria, including a total of 140 cadaveric specimens (robotic: 70, conventional: 70), for resection accuracy between robotic and conventional TKA. Pooled analysis from seven studies revealed a significant difference in femoral coronal and sagittal resection error in favor of robotic systems compared to conventional systems (p < 0.001 & p < 0.001, respectively). The pooled analysis from seven studies revealed a significant difference in tibial sagittal resection error in favor of robotic systems compared to conventional systems following TKA (p = 0.012). Posthoc power analysis revealed a power of 87.2%. CONCLUSION: The use of robotic TKA is associated with lower femoral coronal, lower femoral sagittal and tibial sagittal resection error compared to conventional TKA. It should be noted that these findings are purely biomechanical – surgeons should interpret these findings along with clinical differences between conventional and robotic systems to determine which system is best for each patient. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10063757/ /pubmed/36995538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00587-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Sequeira, Sean B. Duvall, Grant T. Boucher, Henry A biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens |
title | A biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens |
title_full | A biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens |
title_fullStr | A biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens |
title_full_unstemmed | A biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens |
title_short | A biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens |
title_sort | biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (tka) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36995538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00587-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sequeiraseanb abiomechanicalcomparisonbetweenroboticandconventionaltotalkneearthroplastytkainresectionaccuracyametaanalysisoncadavericspecimens AT duvallgrantt abiomechanicalcomparisonbetweenroboticandconventionaltotalkneearthroplastytkainresectionaccuracyametaanalysisoncadavericspecimens AT boucherhenry abiomechanicalcomparisonbetweenroboticandconventionaltotalkneearthroplastytkainresectionaccuracyametaanalysisoncadavericspecimens AT sequeiraseanb biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenroboticandconventionaltotalkneearthroplastytkainresectionaccuracyametaanalysisoncadavericspecimens AT duvallgrantt biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenroboticandconventionaltotalkneearthroplastytkainresectionaccuracyametaanalysisoncadavericspecimens AT boucherhenry biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenroboticandconventionaltotalkneearthroplastytkainresectionaccuracyametaanalysisoncadavericspecimens |