Cargando…

Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?

OBJECTIVE: To quantify fetal cardiovascular parameters utilizing fetal-specific 2D speckle tracking technique and to explore the differences in size and systolic function of the left and right ventricles in low-risk pregnancy. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in 453 low-risk single...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Chen, Li, Man, Xu, Cheng-Jie, Ding, Meng-Juan, Xiong, Yu, Liu, Rui, Ren, Yun-Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37008336
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1052178
_version_ 1785017767691288576
author Zhu, Chen
Li, Man
Xu, Cheng-Jie
Ding, Meng-Juan
Xiong, Yu
Liu, Rui
Ren, Yun-Yun
author_facet Zhu, Chen
Li, Man
Xu, Cheng-Jie
Ding, Meng-Juan
Xiong, Yu
Liu, Rui
Ren, Yun-Yun
author_sort Zhu, Chen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To quantify fetal cardiovascular parameters utilizing fetal-specific 2D speckle tracking technique and to explore the differences in size and systolic function of the left and right ventricles in low-risk pregnancy. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in 453 low-risk single fetuses (28(+0)–39(+6) weeks) to evaluate ventricular size [i.e., end-diastolic length (EDL), end-systolic length (ESL), end-diastolic diameter (ED), end-systolic diameter (ES), end-diastolic area, end-systolic area, end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV)] and systolic function [i.e., ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), cardiac output per kilogram (CO/KG), and stroke volume per kilogram (SV/KG)]. RESULTS: This study showed that (1) the reproducibility of the interobserver and intraobserver measurements was good to excellent (ICC 0.626–0.936); (2) with advancing gestation, fetal ventricular size and systolic function increased, whereas right ventricular (RV) EF decreased and left ventricular (LV) EF was not significantly changed; (3) LV length was longer than RV length in diastole (2.24 vs. 1.96 cm, P < 0.001) and systole (1.72 vs. 1.52 cm, P < 0.001); (4) LV ED-S1 and ES-S1 were shorter than the RV ED-S1 and ES-S1 (12.87 vs. 13.43 mm, P < 0.001; 5.09 vs. 5.61 mm, P < 0.001); (5) there were no differences between the LV and RV in EDA or EDV; (6) the mean EDV ratio of right-to-left ventricle was 1.076 (95% CI, 1.038–1.114), and the mean ESV ratio was 1.628 (95% CI, 1.555–1.701); (7) the EF, CO and SV of the LV were greater than the RV (EF: 62.69% vs. 46.09%, P < 0.001; CO: 167.85 vs. 128.69 ml, P < 0.001; SV: 1.18 vs. 0.88 ml, P < 0.001); (8) SV and CO increased with ED-S1 and EDL, but EF was not significantly changed. CONCLUSION: Low-risk fetal cardiovascular physiology is characterized by a larger RV volume (especially after 32 weeks) and greater LV outputs (EF, CO, SV, SV/KG and CO/KG).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10063784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100637842023-04-01 Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant? Zhu, Chen Li, Man Xu, Cheng-Jie Ding, Meng-Juan Xiong, Yu Liu, Rui Ren, Yun-Yun Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: To quantify fetal cardiovascular parameters utilizing fetal-specific 2D speckle tracking technique and to explore the differences in size and systolic function of the left and right ventricles in low-risk pregnancy. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in 453 low-risk single fetuses (28(+0)–39(+6) weeks) to evaluate ventricular size [i.e., end-diastolic length (EDL), end-systolic length (ESL), end-diastolic diameter (ED), end-systolic diameter (ES), end-diastolic area, end-systolic area, end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV)] and systolic function [i.e., ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), cardiac output per kilogram (CO/KG), and stroke volume per kilogram (SV/KG)]. RESULTS: This study showed that (1) the reproducibility of the interobserver and intraobserver measurements was good to excellent (ICC 0.626–0.936); (2) with advancing gestation, fetal ventricular size and systolic function increased, whereas right ventricular (RV) EF decreased and left ventricular (LV) EF was not significantly changed; (3) LV length was longer than RV length in diastole (2.24 vs. 1.96 cm, P < 0.001) and systole (1.72 vs. 1.52 cm, P < 0.001); (4) LV ED-S1 and ES-S1 were shorter than the RV ED-S1 and ES-S1 (12.87 vs. 13.43 mm, P < 0.001; 5.09 vs. 5.61 mm, P < 0.001); (5) there were no differences between the LV and RV in EDA or EDV; (6) the mean EDV ratio of right-to-left ventricle was 1.076 (95% CI, 1.038–1.114), and the mean ESV ratio was 1.628 (95% CI, 1.555–1.701); (7) the EF, CO and SV of the LV were greater than the RV (EF: 62.69% vs. 46.09%, P < 0.001; CO: 167.85 vs. 128.69 ml, P < 0.001; SV: 1.18 vs. 0.88 ml, P < 0.001); (8) SV and CO increased with ED-S1 and EDL, but EF was not significantly changed. CONCLUSION: Low-risk fetal cardiovascular physiology is characterized by a larger RV volume (especially after 32 weeks) and greater LV outputs (EF, CO, SV, SV/KG and CO/KG). Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10063784/ /pubmed/37008336 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1052178 Text en © 2023 Zhu, Li, Xu, Ding, Xiong, Liu and Ren. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Zhu, Chen
Li, Man
Xu, Cheng-Jie
Ding, Meng-Juan
Xiong, Yu
Liu, Rui
Ren, Yun-Yun
Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?
title Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?
title_full Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?
title_fullStr Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?
title_short Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?
title_sort comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: which is more dominant?
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37008336
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1052178
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuchen comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant
AT liman comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant
AT xuchengjie comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant
AT dingmengjuan comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant
AT xiongyu comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant
AT liurui comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant
AT renyunyun comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant