Cargando…

Plan Selection, Enrollee Risk, and Health Spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Individual Marketplaces, 2019

IMPORTANCE: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) individual marketplaces are a source of insurance for millions of residents in the US. However, the association between enrollee risk, health spending, and metal tier selection remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To describe individual market...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Treasure, Graham, Anderson, David M., Hatcher, Lauren, Makhoul, Alexandra E., Johnson, Darren, Stefan, Jenna, Griffith, Kevin N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36995715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4529
_version_ 1785017864077443072
author Treasure, Graham
Anderson, David M.
Hatcher, Lauren
Makhoul, Alexandra E.
Johnson, Darren
Stefan, Jenna
Griffith, Kevin N.
author_facet Treasure, Graham
Anderson, David M.
Hatcher, Lauren
Makhoul, Alexandra E.
Johnson, Darren
Stefan, Jenna
Griffith, Kevin N.
author_sort Treasure, Graham
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) individual marketplaces are a source of insurance for millions of residents in the US. However, the association between enrollee risk, health spending, and metal tier selection remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To describe individual marketplace enrollees’ metal tier selections by risk score and assess enrollees’ health spending by metal tier, risk score, and spending type. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed claims data from the Wakely Consulting Group ACA database, a deidentified claims database built on data voluntarily submitted by insurers. Enrollees with continuous, full-year enrollment in on-exchange or off-exchange ACA-qualified health plans during the 2019 contract year were included. Data analysis was conducted from March 2021 to January 2023. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Enrollment totals, total spending, and out-of-pocket cost were calculated, stratified by metal tier and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) risk score for 2019. RESULTS: Enrollment and claims data were obtained for 1 317 707 enrollees (53.5% female; mean [SD] age, 46.35 [13.43] years) across all census areas, age groups, and sexes. Of these, 34.6% were on plans with cost-sharing reductions (CSRs), 75.5% did not have an assigned HCC, and 84.0% submitted at least 1 claim. Compared with enrollees in bronze plans (17.2%), enrollees were more likely to be classified in the top HHS-HCC risk quartile if they selected platinum (42.0%), gold (34.4%), or silver (29.7%) plans. The highest share of enrollees with $0 total spending was noted with the catastrophic (26.4%) and bronze (22.7%) plans, while gold plans had the lowest share (8.1%). Median total spending was lower among bronze plan enrollees ($593; IQR, $28-$2100) vs platinum ($4111; IQR, $992-$15 821) or gold ($2675; IQR, $728-$9070). Within the top risk score decile, CSR enrollees had less average total spending than any other metal tier by more than 10%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study of the ACA individual marketplace, enrollees who selected plans with higher actuarial value also had greater mean HHS-HCC risk scores and health spending. The findings suggest these differences may be associated with variation in benefit generosity by metal tier, enrollee’s perceptions of future health needs, or other barriers to care access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10064254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100642542023-04-01 Plan Selection, Enrollee Risk, and Health Spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Individual Marketplaces, 2019 Treasure, Graham Anderson, David M. Hatcher, Lauren Makhoul, Alexandra E. Johnson, Darren Stefan, Jenna Griffith, Kevin N. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) individual marketplaces are a source of insurance for millions of residents in the US. However, the association between enrollee risk, health spending, and metal tier selection remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To describe individual marketplace enrollees’ metal tier selections by risk score and assess enrollees’ health spending by metal tier, risk score, and spending type. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed claims data from the Wakely Consulting Group ACA database, a deidentified claims database built on data voluntarily submitted by insurers. Enrollees with continuous, full-year enrollment in on-exchange or off-exchange ACA-qualified health plans during the 2019 contract year were included. Data analysis was conducted from March 2021 to January 2023. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Enrollment totals, total spending, and out-of-pocket cost were calculated, stratified by metal tier and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) risk score for 2019. RESULTS: Enrollment and claims data were obtained for 1 317 707 enrollees (53.5% female; mean [SD] age, 46.35 [13.43] years) across all census areas, age groups, and sexes. Of these, 34.6% were on plans with cost-sharing reductions (CSRs), 75.5% did not have an assigned HCC, and 84.0% submitted at least 1 claim. Compared with enrollees in bronze plans (17.2%), enrollees were more likely to be classified in the top HHS-HCC risk quartile if they selected platinum (42.0%), gold (34.4%), or silver (29.7%) plans. The highest share of enrollees with $0 total spending was noted with the catastrophic (26.4%) and bronze (22.7%) plans, while gold plans had the lowest share (8.1%). Median total spending was lower among bronze plan enrollees ($593; IQR, $28-$2100) vs platinum ($4111; IQR, $992-$15 821) or gold ($2675; IQR, $728-$9070). Within the top risk score decile, CSR enrollees had less average total spending than any other metal tier by more than 10%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study of the ACA individual marketplace, enrollees who selected plans with higher actuarial value also had greater mean HHS-HCC risk scores and health spending. The findings suggest these differences may be associated with variation in benefit generosity by metal tier, enrollee’s perceptions of future health needs, or other barriers to care access. American Medical Association 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10064254/ /pubmed/36995715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4529 Text en Copyright 2023 Treasure G et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Treasure, Graham
Anderson, David M.
Hatcher, Lauren
Makhoul, Alexandra E.
Johnson, Darren
Stefan, Jenna
Griffith, Kevin N.
Plan Selection, Enrollee Risk, and Health Spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Individual Marketplaces, 2019
title Plan Selection, Enrollee Risk, and Health Spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Individual Marketplaces, 2019
title_full Plan Selection, Enrollee Risk, and Health Spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Individual Marketplaces, 2019
title_fullStr Plan Selection, Enrollee Risk, and Health Spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Individual Marketplaces, 2019
title_full_unstemmed Plan Selection, Enrollee Risk, and Health Spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Individual Marketplaces, 2019
title_short Plan Selection, Enrollee Risk, and Health Spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Individual Marketplaces, 2019
title_sort plan selection, enrollee risk, and health spending on the patient protection and affordable care act individual marketplaces, 2019
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36995715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4529
work_keys_str_mv AT treasuregraham planselectionenrolleeriskandhealthspendingonthepatientprotectionandaffordablecareactindividualmarketplaces2019
AT andersondavidm planselectionenrolleeriskandhealthspendingonthepatientprotectionandaffordablecareactindividualmarketplaces2019
AT hatcherlauren planselectionenrolleeriskandhealthspendingonthepatientprotectionandaffordablecareactindividualmarketplaces2019
AT makhoulalexandrae planselectionenrolleeriskandhealthspendingonthepatientprotectionandaffordablecareactindividualmarketplaces2019
AT johnsondarren planselectionenrolleeriskandhealthspendingonthepatientprotectionandaffordablecareactindividualmarketplaces2019
AT stefanjenna planselectionenrolleeriskandhealthspendingonthepatientprotectionandaffordablecareactindividualmarketplaces2019
AT griffithkevinn planselectionenrolleeriskandhealthspendingonthepatientprotectionandaffordablecareactindividualmarketplaces2019