Cargando…

Peri-Insular Hemispherotomy: A Systematic Review and Institutional Experience

INTRODUCTION: Peri-insular hemispherotomy (PIH) is a hemispheric separation technique under the broader hemispherotomy group, a surgical treatment for patients with intractable epilepsy. Hemispherotomy techniques such as the PIH, vertical parasagittal hemispherotomy (VPH), and modified-lateral hemis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yates, Charles F., Malone, Stephen, Riney, Kate, Shah, Ubaid, Wood, Martin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36693334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000529098
_version_ 1785017889471856640
author Yates, Charles F.
Malone, Stephen
Riney, Kate
Shah, Ubaid
Wood, Martin J.
author_facet Yates, Charles F.
Malone, Stephen
Riney, Kate
Shah, Ubaid
Wood, Martin J.
author_sort Yates, Charles F.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Peri-insular hemispherotomy (PIH) is a hemispheric separation technique under the broader hemispherotomy group, a surgical treatment for patients with intractable epilepsy. Hemispherotomy techniques such as the PIH, vertical parasagittal hemispherotomy (VPH), and modified-lateral hemispherotomy are commonly assessed together, despite significant differences in anatomical approach and patient selection. We aim to describe patient selection, outcomes, and complications of PIH in its own right. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted, with searches of the PubMed and Embase databases. A local series including patients receiving PIH and followed up at the Queensland Children's Hospital between 2014 and 2020 was included. RESULTS: Systematic review of the literature identified 393 patients from 13 eligible studies. Engel class 1 outcomes occurred in 82.4% of patients, while 8.6% developed post-operative hydrocephalus. Hydrocephalus was most common in the youngest patient cohorts. Developmental pathology was present in 114 (40.8%) patients, who had fewer Engel 1 outcomes compared to those with acquired pathology (69.1% vs. 83.7%, p = 0.0167). The local series included 13 patients, 11/13 (84.6%) had Engel class 1 seizure outcomes. Post-operative hydrocephalus occurred in 2 patients (15.4%), and 10/13 (76.9%) patients had worsened neurological deficit. CONCLUSION: PIH delivers Engel 1 outcomes for over 4 in 5 patients selected for this procedure, greater than described in combined hemispherectomy analyses. It is an effective technique in patients with developmental and acquired pathologies, despite general preference of VPH in this patient group. Finally, very young patients may have significant seizure and cognitive benefits from PIH; however, hydrocephalus is most common in this group warranting careful risk-benefit assessment. This review delivers a dedicated PIH outcomes analysis to inform clinical and patient decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10064387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100643872023-04-01 Peri-Insular Hemispherotomy: A Systematic Review and Institutional Experience Yates, Charles F. Malone, Stephen Riney, Kate Shah, Ubaid Wood, Martin J. Pediatr Neurosurg Review Article INTRODUCTION: Peri-insular hemispherotomy (PIH) is a hemispheric separation technique under the broader hemispherotomy group, a surgical treatment for patients with intractable epilepsy. Hemispherotomy techniques such as the PIH, vertical parasagittal hemispherotomy (VPH), and modified-lateral hemispherotomy are commonly assessed together, despite significant differences in anatomical approach and patient selection. We aim to describe patient selection, outcomes, and complications of PIH in its own right. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted, with searches of the PubMed and Embase databases. A local series including patients receiving PIH and followed up at the Queensland Children's Hospital between 2014 and 2020 was included. RESULTS: Systematic review of the literature identified 393 patients from 13 eligible studies. Engel class 1 outcomes occurred in 82.4% of patients, while 8.6% developed post-operative hydrocephalus. Hydrocephalus was most common in the youngest patient cohorts. Developmental pathology was present in 114 (40.8%) patients, who had fewer Engel 1 outcomes compared to those with acquired pathology (69.1% vs. 83.7%, p = 0.0167). The local series included 13 patients, 11/13 (84.6%) had Engel class 1 seizure outcomes. Post-operative hydrocephalus occurred in 2 patients (15.4%), and 10/13 (76.9%) patients had worsened neurological deficit. CONCLUSION: PIH delivers Engel 1 outcomes for over 4 in 5 patients selected for this procedure, greater than described in combined hemispherectomy analyses. It is an effective technique in patients with developmental and acquired pathologies, despite general preference of VPH in this patient group. Finally, very young patients may have significant seizure and cognitive benefits from PIH; however, hydrocephalus is most common in this group warranting careful risk-benefit assessment. This review delivers a dedicated PIH outcomes analysis to inform clinical and patient decision-making. S. Karger AG 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10064387/ /pubmed/36693334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000529098 Text en The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). Usage, derivative works and distribution are permitted provided that proper credit is given to the author and the original publisher.
spellingShingle Review Article
Yates, Charles F.
Malone, Stephen
Riney, Kate
Shah, Ubaid
Wood, Martin J.
Peri-Insular Hemispherotomy: A Systematic Review and Institutional Experience
title Peri-Insular Hemispherotomy: A Systematic Review and Institutional Experience
title_full Peri-Insular Hemispherotomy: A Systematic Review and Institutional Experience
title_fullStr Peri-Insular Hemispherotomy: A Systematic Review and Institutional Experience
title_full_unstemmed Peri-Insular Hemispherotomy: A Systematic Review and Institutional Experience
title_short Peri-Insular Hemispherotomy: A Systematic Review and Institutional Experience
title_sort peri-insular hemispherotomy: a systematic review and institutional experience
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36693334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000529098
work_keys_str_mv AT yatescharlesf periinsularhemispherotomyasystematicreviewandinstitutionalexperience
AT malonestephen periinsularhemispherotomyasystematicreviewandinstitutionalexperience
AT rineykate periinsularhemispherotomyasystematicreviewandinstitutionalexperience
AT shahubaid periinsularhemispherotomyasystematicreviewandinstitutionalexperience
AT woodmartinj periinsularhemispherotomyasystematicreviewandinstitutionalexperience