Cargando…

Comparison of IVIg and TPE efficacy in the treatment of neurological disorders: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) are among the main immunotherapies for neurological disorders. Their benefit is greatest in immune-mediated conditions, but their distinct efficacy cannot be simply explained. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to systema...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinto, Ashwin A., De Seze, Jerome, Jacob, Anu, Reddel, Stephen, Yudina, Anna, Tan, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37006460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864231154306
_version_ 1785017902624145408
author Pinto, Ashwin A.
De Seze, Jerome
Jacob, Anu
Reddel, Stephen
Yudina, Anna
Tan, Kevin
author_facet Pinto, Ashwin A.
De Seze, Jerome
Jacob, Anu
Reddel, Stephen
Yudina, Anna
Tan, Kevin
author_sort Pinto, Ashwin A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) are among the main immunotherapies for neurological disorders. Their benefit is greatest in immune-mediated conditions, but their distinct efficacy cannot be simply explained. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to systematically identify studies comparing the efficacy of TPE and IVIg treatments for selected autoimmune neurological disorders and identify optimal therapies for each condition. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for original publications from 1990 to 2021. Additional publications were identified via expert recommendations. Conference abstracts older than 2017, review articles and articles without information on TPE and IVIg comparison in title and abstract were excluded. Risks of bias were descriptively addressed, without a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Forty-four studies were included on Guillain–Barré syndrome (20 studies – 12 adult, 5 paediatric, 3 all ages), myasthenia gravis (11 studies –8 adult, 3 paediatric), chronic immune–mediated polyradiculoneuropathy (3 studies –1 adult, 2 paediatric), encephalitis (1 study in adults), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (5 studies –2 adult, 3 all ages) and other conditions (4 studies – all ages). TPE and IVIg were mostly similarly efficacious, measured by clinical outcomes and disease severity scores. Some studies recommended IVIg as easy to administer. TPE procedures, however, have been simplified and the safety has been improved. TPE is currently recommended for management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder relapses and some myasthenia gravis subtypes, in which rapid removal of autoantibodies is crucial. CONCLUSION: Despite some limitations (e.g. the low evidence levels), this review provides an extensive 30-year-long overview of treatments for various conditions. Both IVIg and TPE are usually comparably efficacious options for autoimmune neurological disorders, with few exceptions. Treatment choices should be patient-tailored and based on available clinical resources. Better designed studies are needed to provide higher-level quality of evidence regarding clinical efficacy of TPE and IVIg treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10064470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100644702023-04-01 Comparison of IVIg and TPE efficacy in the treatment of neurological disorders: a systematic literature review Pinto, Ashwin A. De Seze, Jerome Jacob, Anu Reddel, Stephen Yudina, Anna Tan, Kevin Ther Adv Neurol Disord Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) are among the main immunotherapies for neurological disorders. Their benefit is greatest in immune-mediated conditions, but their distinct efficacy cannot be simply explained. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to systematically identify studies comparing the efficacy of TPE and IVIg treatments for selected autoimmune neurological disorders and identify optimal therapies for each condition. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for original publications from 1990 to 2021. Additional publications were identified via expert recommendations. Conference abstracts older than 2017, review articles and articles without information on TPE and IVIg comparison in title and abstract were excluded. Risks of bias were descriptively addressed, without a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Forty-four studies were included on Guillain–Barré syndrome (20 studies – 12 adult, 5 paediatric, 3 all ages), myasthenia gravis (11 studies –8 adult, 3 paediatric), chronic immune–mediated polyradiculoneuropathy (3 studies –1 adult, 2 paediatric), encephalitis (1 study in adults), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (5 studies –2 adult, 3 all ages) and other conditions (4 studies – all ages). TPE and IVIg were mostly similarly efficacious, measured by clinical outcomes and disease severity scores. Some studies recommended IVIg as easy to administer. TPE procedures, however, have been simplified and the safety has been improved. TPE is currently recommended for management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder relapses and some myasthenia gravis subtypes, in which rapid removal of autoantibodies is crucial. CONCLUSION: Despite some limitations (e.g. the low evidence levels), this review provides an extensive 30-year-long overview of treatments for various conditions. Both IVIg and TPE are usually comparably efficacious options for autoimmune neurological disorders, with few exceptions. Treatment choices should be patient-tailored and based on available clinical resources. Better designed studies are needed to provide higher-level quality of evidence regarding clinical efficacy of TPE and IVIg treatments. SAGE Publications 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10064470/ /pubmed/37006460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864231154306 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Pinto, Ashwin A.
De Seze, Jerome
Jacob, Anu
Reddel, Stephen
Yudina, Anna
Tan, Kevin
Comparison of IVIg and TPE efficacy in the treatment of neurological disorders: a systematic literature review
title Comparison of IVIg and TPE efficacy in the treatment of neurological disorders: a systematic literature review
title_full Comparison of IVIg and TPE efficacy in the treatment of neurological disorders: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Comparison of IVIg and TPE efficacy in the treatment of neurological disorders: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of IVIg and TPE efficacy in the treatment of neurological disorders: a systematic literature review
title_short Comparison of IVIg and TPE efficacy in the treatment of neurological disorders: a systematic literature review
title_sort comparison of ivig and tpe efficacy in the treatment of neurological disorders: a systematic literature review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37006460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864231154306
work_keys_str_mv AT pintoashwina comparisonofivigandtpeefficacyinthetreatmentofneurologicaldisordersasystematicliteraturereview
AT desezejerome comparisonofivigandtpeefficacyinthetreatmentofneurologicaldisordersasystematicliteraturereview
AT jacobanu comparisonofivigandtpeefficacyinthetreatmentofneurologicaldisordersasystematicliteraturereview
AT reddelstephen comparisonofivigandtpeefficacyinthetreatmentofneurologicaldisordersasystematicliteraturereview
AT yudinaanna comparisonofivigandtpeefficacyinthetreatmentofneurologicaldisordersasystematicliteraturereview
AT tankevin comparisonofivigandtpeefficacyinthetreatmentofneurologicaldisordersasystematicliteraturereview