Cargando…

Judicial and legislative practice and related suggestions on off-label drug use in China

BACKGROUND: Off-label drug use exists widely in medical practice and is also an area which easily triggers controversy between patients and medical institutions. Previous studies have identified the reasons why off-label drug use long exists. However, there is no multidimensional analysis on real ju...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Si, Wenjie, Ma, Panpan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09293-y
_version_ 1785017905210982400
author Si, Wenjie
Ma, Panpan
author_facet Si, Wenjie
Ma, Panpan
author_sort Si, Wenjie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Off-label drug use exists widely in medical practice and is also an area which easily triggers controversy between patients and medical institutions. Previous studies have identified the reasons why off-label drug use long exists. However, there is no multidimensional analysis on real judicial precedents about off-label drug use. This study aimed to investigate the dispute points on off-label drug use based on real cases in China, and proposed suggestions based on newly-leased Physicians Law. METHODS: Our study is a retrospective study with all the 35 judicial precedents on off-label drug use extracted from China Judgments Online from 2014 to 2019. This study mainly used the methods of statistical analysis, inferential analysis, exemplification, literature summarization and comparative analysis. RESULTS: According to the analysis of the 35 precedents of jurisdictions from 11 different aspects, it can be seen that the second-instance and retrial rates of this kind of cases are high, and the disputes between patients and medical institutions are fierce. In judicial practice of off-label drug use, medical institutions are determined whether to bear civil liability according to the constituent elements of medical tort liability: the rate of medical institutions’ bearing liability for off-label drug use is not high, and medical institutions are not directly identified as infringing acts and they don’t bear tort liability. The clear provisions about off-label drug use in Law of the People’s Republic of China on Physicians which was implemented in March 2022 confirm this at the legislative level. CONCLUSIONS: By analyzing the current judicial practice of China’s off-label drug use cases, and summarizing the dispute points between medical institution and patients, the constituent elements of tort liability, and the rules of evidence etc., suggestions are proposed to further regulate off-label drug use and promote safe and rational drug use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10064495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100644952023-04-01 Judicial and legislative practice and related suggestions on off-label drug use in China Si, Wenjie Ma, Panpan BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Off-label drug use exists widely in medical practice and is also an area which easily triggers controversy between patients and medical institutions. Previous studies have identified the reasons why off-label drug use long exists. However, there is no multidimensional analysis on real judicial precedents about off-label drug use. This study aimed to investigate the dispute points on off-label drug use based on real cases in China, and proposed suggestions based on newly-leased Physicians Law. METHODS: Our study is a retrospective study with all the 35 judicial precedents on off-label drug use extracted from China Judgments Online from 2014 to 2019. This study mainly used the methods of statistical analysis, inferential analysis, exemplification, literature summarization and comparative analysis. RESULTS: According to the analysis of the 35 precedents of jurisdictions from 11 different aspects, it can be seen that the second-instance and retrial rates of this kind of cases are high, and the disputes between patients and medical institutions are fierce. In judicial practice of off-label drug use, medical institutions are determined whether to bear civil liability according to the constituent elements of medical tort liability: the rate of medical institutions’ bearing liability for off-label drug use is not high, and medical institutions are not directly identified as infringing acts and they don’t bear tort liability. The clear provisions about off-label drug use in Law of the People’s Republic of China on Physicians which was implemented in March 2022 confirm this at the legislative level. CONCLUSIONS: By analyzing the current judicial practice of China’s off-label drug use cases, and summarizing the dispute points between medical institution and patients, the constituent elements of tort liability, and the rules of evidence etc., suggestions are proposed to further regulate off-label drug use and promote safe and rational drug use. BioMed Central 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10064495/ /pubmed/36997974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09293-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Si, Wenjie
Ma, Panpan
Judicial and legislative practice and related suggestions on off-label drug use in China
title Judicial and legislative practice and related suggestions on off-label drug use in China
title_full Judicial and legislative practice and related suggestions on off-label drug use in China
title_fullStr Judicial and legislative practice and related suggestions on off-label drug use in China
title_full_unstemmed Judicial and legislative practice and related suggestions on off-label drug use in China
title_short Judicial and legislative practice and related suggestions on off-label drug use in China
title_sort judicial and legislative practice and related suggestions on off-label drug use in china
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09293-y
work_keys_str_mv AT siwenjie judicialandlegislativepracticeandrelatedsuggestionsonofflabeldruguseinchina
AT mapanpan judicialandlegislativepracticeandrelatedsuggestionsonofflabeldruguseinchina