Cargando…

Clinical Validation and Treatment Plan Evaluation Based on Autodelineation of the Clinical Target Volume for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Clinical target volumes (CTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) could be autocontoured to save workload. This study aimed to assess a convolutional neural network for automatic and accurate CTV and OARs in prostate cancer, while comparing possible treatment plans based on autocontouring CTV to cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Jing, Tao, Yinjie, Guan, Hui, Zhen, Hongnan, He, Lei, Dong, Tingting, Wang, Shaobin, Chen, Yu, Chen, Qi, Liu, Zhikai, Zhang, Fuquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231164883
_version_ 1785017913849151488
author Shen, Jing
Tao, Yinjie
Guan, Hui
Zhen, Hongnan
He, Lei
Dong, Tingting
Wang, Shaobin
Chen, Yu
Chen, Qi
Liu, Zhikai
Zhang, Fuquan
author_facet Shen, Jing
Tao, Yinjie
Guan, Hui
Zhen, Hongnan
He, Lei
Dong, Tingting
Wang, Shaobin
Chen, Yu
Chen, Qi
Liu, Zhikai
Zhang, Fuquan
author_sort Shen, Jing
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Clinical target volumes (CTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) could be autocontoured to save workload. This study aimed to assess a convolutional neural network for automatic and accurate CTV and OARs in prostate cancer, while comparing possible treatment plans based on autocontouring CTV to clinical treatment plans. METHODS: Computer tomography (CT) scans of 217 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated at our hospital were retrospectively collected and analyzed from January 2013 to January 2019. A deep learning-based method, CUNet, was used to delineate CTV and OARs. A training set of 195 CT scans and a test set of 28 CT scans were randomly chosen from the dataset. The mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (95HD), and subjective evaluation were used to evaluate the performance of this strategy. Predetermined evaluation criteria were used to grade treatment plans, and percentage errors for clinical doses to the planned target volume (PTV) and OARs were calculated. RESULTS: The mean DSC and 95HD values of the defined CTVs were (0.84 ± 0.05) and (5.04 ± 2.15) mm, respectively. The average delineation time was < 15 s for each patient's CT scan. The overall positive rates for clinicians A and B were 53.15% versus 46.85%, and 54.05% versus 45.95%, respectively (P > .05) when CTV outlines from CUNet were blindly chosen and compared with the ground truth (GT). Furthermore, 8 test patients were randomly chosen to design the predicted plan based on the autocontouring CTVs and OARs, demonstrating acceptable agreement with the clinical plan: average absolute dose differences in mean value of D2, D50, D98, Dmax, and Dmean for PTV were within 0.74%, and average absolute volume differences in mean value of V45 and V50 for OARs were within 3.4%. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed that the CTVs and OARs for prostate cancer defined by CUNet were close to the GT. CUNet could halve the time spent by radiation oncologists in contouring, demonstrating the potential of the novel autocontouring method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10064523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100645232023-04-01 Clinical Validation and Treatment Plan Evaluation Based on Autodelineation of the Clinical Target Volume for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy Shen, Jing Tao, Yinjie Guan, Hui Zhen, Hongnan He, Lei Dong, Tingting Wang, Shaobin Chen, Yu Chen, Qi Liu, Zhikai Zhang, Fuquan Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: Clinical target volumes (CTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) could be autocontoured to save workload. This study aimed to assess a convolutional neural network for automatic and accurate CTV and OARs in prostate cancer, while comparing possible treatment plans based on autocontouring CTV to clinical treatment plans. METHODS: Computer tomography (CT) scans of 217 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated at our hospital were retrospectively collected and analyzed from January 2013 to January 2019. A deep learning-based method, CUNet, was used to delineate CTV and OARs. A training set of 195 CT scans and a test set of 28 CT scans were randomly chosen from the dataset. The mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (95HD), and subjective evaluation were used to evaluate the performance of this strategy. Predetermined evaluation criteria were used to grade treatment plans, and percentage errors for clinical doses to the planned target volume (PTV) and OARs were calculated. RESULTS: The mean DSC and 95HD values of the defined CTVs were (0.84 ± 0.05) and (5.04 ± 2.15) mm, respectively. The average delineation time was < 15 s for each patient's CT scan. The overall positive rates for clinicians A and B were 53.15% versus 46.85%, and 54.05% versus 45.95%, respectively (P > .05) when CTV outlines from CUNet were blindly chosen and compared with the ground truth (GT). Furthermore, 8 test patients were randomly chosen to design the predicted plan based on the autocontouring CTVs and OARs, demonstrating acceptable agreement with the clinical plan: average absolute dose differences in mean value of D2, D50, D98, Dmax, and Dmean for PTV were within 0.74%, and average absolute volume differences in mean value of V45 and V50 for OARs were within 3.4%. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed that the CTVs and OARs for prostate cancer defined by CUNet were close to the GT. CUNet could halve the time spent by radiation oncologists in contouring, demonstrating the potential of the novel autocontouring method. SAGE Publications 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10064523/ /pubmed/36991566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231164883 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Shen, Jing
Tao, Yinjie
Guan, Hui
Zhen, Hongnan
He, Lei
Dong, Tingting
Wang, Shaobin
Chen, Yu
Chen, Qi
Liu, Zhikai
Zhang, Fuquan
Clinical Validation and Treatment Plan Evaluation Based on Autodelineation of the Clinical Target Volume for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
title Clinical Validation and Treatment Plan Evaluation Based on Autodelineation of the Clinical Target Volume for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
title_full Clinical Validation and Treatment Plan Evaluation Based on Autodelineation of the Clinical Target Volume for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
title_fullStr Clinical Validation and Treatment Plan Evaluation Based on Autodelineation of the Clinical Target Volume for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Validation and Treatment Plan Evaluation Based on Autodelineation of the Clinical Target Volume for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
title_short Clinical Validation and Treatment Plan Evaluation Based on Autodelineation of the Clinical Target Volume for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
title_sort clinical validation and treatment plan evaluation based on autodelineation of the clinical target volume for prostate cancer radiotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231164883
work_keys_str_mv AT shenjing clinicalvalidationandtreatmentplanevaluationbasedonautodelineationoftheclinicaltargetvolumeforprostatecancerradiotherapy
AT taoyinjie clinicalvalidationandtreatmentplanevaluationbasedonautodelineationoftheclinicaltargetvolumeforprostatecancerradiotherapy
AT guanhui clinicalvalidationandtreatmentplanevaluationbasedonautodelineationoftheclinicaltargetvolumeforprostatecancerradiotherapy
AT zhenhongnan clinicalvalidationandtreatmentplanevaluationbasedonautodelineationoftheclinicaltargetvolumeforprostatecancerradiotherapy
AT helei clinicalvalidationandtreatmentplanevaluationbasedonautodelineationoftheclinicaltargetvolumeforprostatecancerradiotherapy
AT dongtingting clinicalvalidationandtreatmentplanevaluationbasedonautodelineationoftheclinicaltargetvolumeforprostatecancerradiotherapy
AT wangshaobin clinicalvalidationandtreatmentplanevaluationbasedonautodelineationoftheclinicaltargetvolumeforprostatecancerradiotherapy
AT chenyu clinicalvalidationandtreatmentplanevaluationbasedonautodelineationoftheclinicaltargetvolumeforprostatecancerradiotherapy
AT chenqi clinicalvalidationandtreatmentplanevaluationbasedonautodelineationoftheclinicaltargetvolumeforprostatecancerradiotherapy
AT liuzhikai clinicalvalidationandtreatmentplanevaluationbasedonautodelineationoftheclinicaltargetvolumeforprostatecancerradiotherapy
AT zhangfuquan clinicalvalidationandtreatmentplanevaluationbasedonautodelineationoftheclinicaltargetvolumeforprostatecancerradiotherapy