Cargando…

Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) polymers to indirect laboratory composite (ILC) and lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) veneering materials. METHODS: Polyme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiliç, Mustafa, Dede, Doğu Ömür, Küçükekenci, Ahmet Serkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02879-2
_version_ 1785017948748906496
author Kiliç, Mustafa
Dede, Doğu Ömür
Küçükekenci, Ahmet Serkan
author_facet Kiliç, Mustafa
Dede, Doğu Ömür
Küçükekenci, Ahmet Serkan
author_sort Kiliç, Mustafa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) polymers to indirect laboratory composite (ILC) and lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) veneering materials. METHODS: Polymer specimens (7 × 7x2 mm) were sectioned from PEEK and PEKK discs (N = 294) and randomly allocated to 7 groups (n = 20); untreated (Cnt), plasma (Pls), 98% sulfuric acid (Sa), sandblasting with 110 µm Al(2)O(3) (Sb), tribochemical silica coating with 110 µm silica modified Al(2)O(3) (Tbc), Sb + Sa, Tbc + Sa. Scanning electron microscopy assessments were performed on one sample of each treatment group, and veneering materials were applied to the remaining specimens (n = 10). The specimens were subjected to the SBS test after being soaked in distilled water (24 h, 37 °C). Three-way ANOVA, independent sample t-test, and Tukey HSD test were performed for statistical analyses (α = .05). RESULTS: The surface treatment, polymer, veneering material types, and their interactions were significant on SBS results according to the 3-way ANOVA (p < 0.001). The SBS values of ILC veneered groups were significantly higher than LDC groups, regardless of surface treatment and polymer type (p < 0.05). The highest SBS values were obtained for Sa-applied ILC veneered PEEK (21.55 ± 1.45 MPa) and PEKK (17.04 ± 1.99 MPa) polymer groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The effect of surface treatment and veneering materials may be significant on the SBS values of PAEKs. Therefore, the application parameters of surface treatments should be more specified for the applied veneering material and polymer type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10064678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100646782023-04-01 Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments Kiliç, Mustafa Dede, Doğu Ömür Küçükekenci, Ahmet Serkan BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) polymers to indirect laboratory composite (ILC) and lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) veneering materials. METHODS: Polymer specimens (7 × 7x2 mm) were sectioned from PEEK and PEKK discs (N = 294) and randomly allocated to 7 groups (n = 20); untreated (Cnt), plasma (Pls), 98% sulfuric acid (Sa), sandblasting with 110 µm Al(2)O(3) (Sb), tribochemical silica coating with 110 µm silica modified Al(2)O(3) (Tbc), Sb + Sa, Tbc + Sa. Scanning electron microscopy assessments were performed on one sample of each treatment group, and veneering materials were applied to the remaining specimens (n = 10). The specimens were subjected to the SBS test after being soaked in distilled water (24 h, 37 °C). Three-way ANOVA, independent sample t-test, and Tukey HSD test were performed for statistical analyses (α = .05). RESULTS: The surface treatment, polymer, veneering material types, and their interactions were significant on SBS results according to the 3-way ANOVA (p < 0.001). The SBS values of ILC veneered groups were significantly higher than LDC groups, regardless of surface treatment and polymer type (p < 0.05). The highest SBS values were obtained for Sa-applied ILC veneered PEEK (21.55 ± 1.45 MPa) and PEKK (17.04 ± 1.99 MPa) polymer groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The effect of surface treatment and veneering materials may be significant on the SBS values of PAEKs. Therefore, the application parameters of surface treatments should be more specified for the applied veneering material and polymer type. BioMed Central 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10064678/ /pubmed/36997970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02879-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kiliç, Mustafa
Dede, Doğu Ömür
Küçükekenci, Ahmet Serkan
Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments
title Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments
title_full Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments
title_fullStr Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments
title_short Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments
title_sort comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the paeks after surface treatments
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02879-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kilicmustafa comparingtheshearbondstrengthofveneeringmaterialstothepaeksaftersurfacetreatments
AT dededoguomur comparingtheshearbondstrengthofveneeringmaterialstothepaeksaftersurfacetreatments
AT kucukekenciahmetserkan comparingtheshearbondstrengthofveneeringmaterialstothepaeksaftersurfacetreatments