Cargando…

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been increasingly used to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, the superiority of combination therapy to TACE monotherapy remains controversial. Therefore, here we performed a meta-anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duan, Ruihua, Gong, Fen, Wang, Yan, Huang, Caixia, Wu, Jiaming, Hu, Leihao, Liu, Min, Qiu, Shijun, Lu, Liming, Lin, Yisheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37004052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02961-7
_version_ 1785017955668459520
author Duan, Ruihua
Gong, Fen
Wang, Yan
Huang, Caixia
Wu, Jiaming
Hu, Leihao
Liu, Min
Qiu, Shijun
Lu, Liming
Lin, Yisheng
author_facet Duan, Ruihua
Gong, Fen
Wang, Yan
Huang, Caixia
Wu, Jiaming
Hu, Leihao
Liu, Min
Qiu, Shijun
Lu, Liming
Lin, Yisheng
author_sort Duan, Ruihua
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been increasingly used to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, the superiority of combination therapy to TACE monotherapy remains controversial. Therefore, here we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE plus TKIs in patients with uHCC. METHODS: We searched four databases for eligible studies. The primary outcome was time to progression (TTP), while the secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), tumor response rates, and adverse events (AEs). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were collected for TTP and OS, and the data were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis models in STATA software. OR and 95% CIs were used to estimate dichotomous variables (complete remission[CR], partial remission[PR], stable disease[SD], progressive disease[PD], objective response rate[ORR], disease control rate[DCR], and AEs) using RStudio’s random-effects model. Quality assessments were performed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) for observational studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 30 studies (9 RCTs, 21 observational studies) with 8246 patients. We judged the risk of bias as low in 44.4% (4/9) of the RCTs and high in 55.6% (5/9) of the RCTs. All observational studies were considered of high quality, with a NOS score of at least 6. Compared with TACE alone or TACE plus placebo, TACE combined with TKIs was superior in prolonging TTP (combined HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.65–0.80), OS (combined HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.49–0.67), and objective response rate (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.23–3.67) in patients with uHCC. However, TACE plus TKIs caused a higher incidence of AEs, especially hand-foot skin reactions (OR 87.17%, 95%CI 42.88–177.23), diarrhea (OR 18.13%, 95%CI 9.32–35.27), and hypertension (OR 12.24%, 95%CI 5.89–25.42). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis found that TACE plus TKIs may be beneficial for patients with uHCC in terms of TTP, OS, and tumor response rates. However, combination therapy is also associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse reactions. Therefore, we must evaluate the clinical benefits and risks of combination therapy. Further well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm our findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022298003. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-02961-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10064711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100647112023-04-01 Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Duan, Ruihua Gong, Fen Wang, Yan Huang, Caixia Wu, Jiaming Hu, Leihao Liu, Min Qiu, Shijun Lu, Liming Lin, Yisheng World J Surg Oncol Review PURPOSE: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been increasingly used to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, the superiority of combination therapy to TACE monotherapy remains controversial. Therefore, here we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE plus TKIs in patients with uHCC. METHODS: We searched four databases for eligible studies. The primary outcome was time to progression (TTP), while the secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), tumor response rates, and adverse events (AEs). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were collected for TTP and OS, and the data were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis models in STATA software. OR and 95% CIs were used to estimate dichotomous variables (complete remission[CR], partial remission[PR], stable disease[SD], progressive disease[PD], objective response rate[ORR], disease control rate[DCR], and AEs) using RStudio’s random-effects model. Quality assessments were performed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) for observational studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 30 studies (9 RCTs, 21 observational studies) with 8246 patients. We judged the risk of bias as low in 44.4% (4/9) of the RCTs and high in 55.6% (5/9) of the RCTs. All observational studies were considered of high quality, with a NOS score of at least 6. Compared with TACE alone or TACE plus placebo, TACE combined with TKIs was superior in prolonging TTP (combined HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.65–0.80), OS (combined HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.49–0.67), and objective response rate (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.23–3.67) in patients with uHCC. However, TACE plus TKIs caused a higher incidence of AEs, especially hand-foot skin reactions (OR 87.17%, 95%CI 42.88–177.23), diarrhea (OR 18.13%, 95%CI 9.32–35.27), and hypertension (OR 12.24%, 95%CI 5.89–25.42). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis found that TACE plus TKIs may be beneficial for patients with uHCC in terms of TTP, OS, and tumor response rates. However, combination therapy is also associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse reactions. Therefore, we must evaluate the clinical benefits and risks of combination therapy. Further well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm our findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022298003. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-02961-7. BioMed Central 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10064711/ /pubmed/37004052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02961-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Duan, Ruihua
Gong, Fen
Wang, Yan
Huang, Caixia
Wu, Jiaming
Hu, Leihao
Liu, Min
Qiu, Shijun
Lu, Liming
Lin, Yisheng
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort transarterial chemoembolization (tace) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus tace in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37004052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02961-7
work_keys_str_mv AT duanruihua transarterialchemoembolizationtaceplustyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversustaceinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gongfen transarterialchemoembolizationtaceplustyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversustaceinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyan transarterialchemoembolizationtaceplustyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversustaceinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangcaixia transarterialchemoembolizationtaceplustyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversustaceinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wujiaming transarterialchemoembolizationtaceplustyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversustaceinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huleihao transarterialchemoembolizationtaceplustyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversustaceinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liumin transarterialchemoembolizationtaceplustyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversustaceinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qiushijun transarterialchemoembolizationtaceplustyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversustaceinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luliming transarterialchemoembolizationtaceplustyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversustaceinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linyisheng transarterialchemoembolizationtaceplustyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversustaceinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis