Cargando…

Study of Analytical Error in Lipase Assay

BACKGROUND: Lipase and amylase are the most frequently used biomarker for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases, especially acute pancreatitis. Lipase has better diagnostic accuracy in comparison to amylase for the analysis of acute pancreatitis. However, lipase assay in random access analyzer is som...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumari, Sweta, Shekhar, Ravi, Kumari, Rekha, Prakash, Pritam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695223
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_135_21
_version_ 1785017990159269888
author Kumari, Sweta
Shekhar, Ravi
Kumari, Rekha
Prakash, Pritam
author_facet Kumari, Sweta
Shekhar, Ravi
Kumari, Rekha
Prakash, Pritam
author_sort Kumari, Sweta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lipase and amylase are the most frequently used biomarker for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases, especially acute pancreatitis. Lipase has better diagnostic accuracy in comparison to amylase for the analysis of acute pancreatitis. However, lipase assay in random access analyzer is sometimes difficult to perform as it is exposed to different types of samples or reagents which may act as interference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our laboratory, we found the raised values (>500 IU/L) of lipase with normal amylase in some samples. However, the immediate rerun of these samples for lipase only showed normal (<80 IU/L) lipase level. To root out this fallacy, we performed reagent and sample carryover studies. RESULTS: The cause of the falsely raised value of lipase was revealed by reagent carryover studies. All samples which assayed triglyceride (TGL) followed by lipase immediately after it showed elevated (>500 IU/L) lipase value. This is due to the interference of microbial lipase used in TGL reagents. This was corrected by separating the analysis of lipase and TGL into two different instruments. CONCLUSION: If interference testing is not done, the laboratories are prone to have an analytical error in reporting and hence lead to diagnostic error. Hence, after analyzer installation, interference testing should be included in the validation protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10064892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100648922023-04-01 Study of Analytical Error in Lipase Assay Kumari, Sweta Shekhar, Ravi Kumari, Rekha Prakash, Pritam Ann Afr Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Lipase and amylase are the most frequently used biomarker for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases, especially acute pancreatitis. Lipase has better diagnostic accuracy in comparison to amylase for the analysis of acute pancreatitis. However, lipase assay in random access analyzer is sometimes difficult to perform as it is exposed to different types of samples or reagents which may act as interference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our laboratory, we found the raised values (>500 IU/L) of lipase with normal amylase in some samples. However, the immediate rerun of these samples for lipase only showed normal (<80 IU/L) lipase level. To root out this fallacy, we performed reagent and sample carryover studies. RESULTS: The cause of the falsely raised value of lipase was revealed by reagent carryover studies. All samples which assayed triglyceride (TGL) followed by lipase immediately after it showed elevated (>500 IU/L) lipase value. This is due to the interference of microbial lipase used in TGL reagents. This was corrected by separating the analysis of lipase and TGL into two different instruments. CONCLUSION: If interference testing is not done, the laboratories are prone to have an analytical error in reporting and hence lead to diagnostic error. Hence, after analyzer installation, interference testing should be included in the validation protocol. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10064892/ /pubmed/36695223 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_135_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Annals of African Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumari, Sweta
Shekhar, Ravi
Kumari, Rekha
Prakash, Pritam
Study of Analytical Error in Lipase Assay
title Study of Analytical Error in Lipase Assay
title_full Study of Analytical Error in Lipase Assay
title_fullStr Study of Analytical Error in Lipase Assay
title_full_unstemmed Study of Analytical Error in Lipase Assay
title_short Study of Analytical Error in Lipase Assay
title_sort study of analytical error in lipase assay
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695223
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_135_21
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarisweta studyofanalyticalerrorinlipaseassay
AT shekharravi studyofanalyticalerrorinlipaseassay
AT kumarirekha studyofanalyticalerrorinlipaseassay
AT prakashpritam studyofanalyticalerrorinlipaseassay