Cargando…

The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 3-dimensional (3D) internal adaptation (IA) and fracture resistance (FR) of compomer and glass ionomers applied after conventional caries removal to sound dentin (CCRSD) and selective caries removal to firm dentin (SCRFD) in in-vitro. METHODS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demirel, Akif, Orhan, Ayşe Işıl, Büyüksungur, Arda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37009156
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14825
_version_ 1785018011680243712
author Demirel, Akif
Orhan, Ayşe Işıl
Büyüksungur, Arda
author_facet Demirel, Akif
Orhan, Ayşe Işıl
Büyüksungur, Arda
author_sort Demirel, Akif
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 3-dimensional (3D) internal adaptation (IA) and fracture resistance (FR) of compomer and glass ionomers applied after conventional caries removal to sound dentin (CCRSD) and selective caries removal to firm dentin (SCRFD) in in-vitro. METHODS: Thirty extracted primary molars were randomly assigned to three main groups (n = 10) as glass hybrid restorative (GHR) (Equia Forte(®) HT), conventional glass ionomer (CGIR) (Voco Ionofil Molar) and compomer (Dyract XP). Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups according to caries removal technique as CCRSD (n = 5) and SCRFD (n = 5). The restoration procedures were completed after caries removal (CCRSD or SCRFD) in all samples. Then, specimens were subjected to IA and FR tests. Data were analyzed with Student’s t, one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal Wallis-H tests. The correlation between IA and FR results was analyzed with a Pearson test. The statistical significance level was considered as 5%. RESULTS: While CCRSD showed superior IA results than SCRFD for all restorative materials (p < 0.05), no statistical difference was found between CCRSD and SCRFD in FR assessment (p > 0.05). In CCRSD, compomer showed superior results for IA and FR than glass ionomers (p < 0.05). In SCRFD, it was found no significant difference between the restoratives for IA (p > 0.05). However, compomer showed superior FR results than glass ionomers (p < 0.05). There was moderate negative correlation between internal voids and FR without statistically significant difference (r = −0.333, p = 0.072). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advantages of SCRFD, it was found to be less superior than CCRSD in IA assessment. Therefore, when SCRFD is preferred, a peripheral seal should be provided for ideal restorative treatment. On the other hand, compomer mostly showed superior results compared to others.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10064991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100649912023-04-01 The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study Demirel, Akif Orhan, Ayşe Işıl Büyüksungur, Arda PeerJ Bioengineering BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 3-dimensional (3D) internal adaptation (IA) and fracture resistance (FR) of compomer and glass ionomers applied after conventional caries removal to sound dentin (CCRSD) and selective caries removal to firm dentin (SCRFD) in in-vitro. METHODS: Thirty extracted primary molars were randomly assigned to three main groups (n = 10) as glass hybrid restorative (GHR) (Equia Forte(®) HT), conventional glass ionomer (CGIR) (Voco Ionofil Molar) and compomer (Dyract XP). Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups according to caries removal technique as CCRSD (n = 5) and SCRFD (n = 5). The restoration procedures were completed after caries removal (CCRSD or SCRFD) in all samples. Then, specimens were subjected to IA and FR tests. Data were analyzed with Student’s t, one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal Wallis-H tests. The correlation between IA and FR results was analyzed with a Pearson test. The statistical significance level was considered as 5%. RESULTS: While CCRSD showed superior IA results than SCRFD for all restorative materials (p < 0.05), no statistical difference was found between CCRSD and SCRFD in FR assessment (p > 0.05). In CCRSD, compomer showed superior results for IA and FR than glass ionomers (p < 0.05). In SCRFD, it was found no significant difference between the restoratives for IA (p > 0.05). However, compomer showed superior FR results than glass ionomers (p < 0.05). There was moderate negative correlation between internal voids and FR without statistically significant difference (r = −0.333, p = 0.072). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advantages of SCRFD, it was found to be less superior than CCRSD in IA assessment. Therefore, when SCRFD is preferred, a peripheral seal should be provided for ideal restorative treatment. On the other hand, compomer mostly showed superior results compared to others. PeerJ Inc. 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10064991/ /pubmed/37009156 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14825 Text en © 2023 Demirel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Bioengineering
Demirel, Akif
Orhan, Ayşe Işıl
Büyüksungur, Arda
The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study
title The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study
title_full The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study
title_fullStr The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study
title_short The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study
title_sort assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study
topic Bioengineering
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37009156
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14825
work_keys_str_mv AT demirelakif theassessmentofinternaladaptationandfractureresistanceofglassionomerandresinbasedrestorativematerialsappliedafterdifferentcariesremovaltechniquesinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT orhanayseisıl theassessmentofinternaladaptationandfractureresistanceofglassionomerandresinbasedrestorativematerialsappliedafterdifferentcariesremovaltechniquesinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT buyuksungurarda theassessmentofinternaladaptationandfractureresistanceofglassionomerandresinbasedrestorativematerialsappliedafterdifferentcariesremovaltechniquesinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT demirelakif assessmentofinternaladaptationandfractureresistanceofglassionomerandresinbasedrestorativematerialsappliedafterdifferentcariesremovaltechniquesinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT orhanayseisıl assessmentofinternaladaptationandfractureresistanceofglassionomerandresinbasedrestorativematerialsappliedafterdifferentcariesremovaltechniquesinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT buyuksungurarda assessmentofinternaladaptationandfractureresistanceofglassionomerandresinbasedrestorativematerialsappliedafterdifferentcariesremovaltechniquesinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy