Cargando…
The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 3-dimensional (3D) internal adaptation (IA) and fracture resistance (FR) of compomer and glass ionomers applied after conventional caries removal to sound dentin (CCRSD) and selective caries removal to firm dentin (SCRFD) in in-vitro. METHODS: Th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37009156 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14825 |
_version_ | 1785018011680243712 |
---|---|
author | Demirel, Akif Orhan, Ayşe Işıl Büyüksungur, Arda |
author_facet | Demirel, Akif Orhan, Ayşe Işıl Büyüksungur, Arda |
author_sort | Demirel, Akif |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 3-dimensional (3D) internal adaptation (IA) and fracture resistance (FR) of compomer and glass ionomers applied after conventional caries removal to sound dentin (CCRSD) and selective caries removal to firm dentin (SCRFD) in in-vitro. METHODS: Thirty extracted primary molars were randomly assigned to three main groups (n = 10) as glass hybrid restorative (GHR) (Equia Forte(®) HT), conventional glass ionomer (CGIR) (Voco Ionofil Molar) and compomer (Dyract XP). Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups according to caries removal technique as CCRSD (n = 5) and SCRFD (n = 5). The restoration procedures were completed after caries removal (CCRSD or SCRFD) in all samples. Then, specimens were subjected to IA and FR tests. Data were analyzed with Student’s t, one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal Wallis-H tests. The correlation between IA and FR results was analyzed with a Pearson test. The statistical significance level was considered as 5%. RESULTS: While CCRSD showed superior IA results than SCRFD for all restorative materials (p < 0.05), no statistical difference was found between CCRSD and SCRFD in FR assessment (p > 0.05). In CCRSD, compomer showed superior results for IA and FR than glass ionomers (p < 0.05). In SCRFD, it was found no significant difference between the restoratives for IA (p > 0.05). However, compomer showed superior FR results than glass ionomers (p < 0.05). There was moderate negative correlation between internal voids and FR without statistically significant difference (r = −0.333, p = 0.072). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advantages of SCRFD, it was found to be less superior than CCRSD in IA assessment. Therefore, when SCRFD is preferred, a peripheral seal should be provided for ideal restorative treatment. On the other hand, compomer mostly showed superior results compared to others. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10064991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100649912023-04-01 The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study Demirel, Akif Orhan, Ayşe Işıl Büyüksungur, Arda PeerJ Bioengineering BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 3-dimensional (3D) internal adaptation (IA) and fracture resistance (FR) of compomer and glass ionomers applied after conventional caries removal to sound dentin (CCRSD) and selective caries removal to firm dentin (SCRFD) in in-vitro. METHODS: Thirty extracted primary molars were randomly assigned to three main groups (n = 10) as glass hybrid restorative (GHR) (Equia Forte(®) HT), conventional glass ionomer (CGIR) (Voco Ionofil Molar) and compomer (Dyract XP). Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups according to caries removal technique as CCRSD (n = 5) and SCRFD (n = 5). The restoration procedures were completed after caries removal (CCRSD or SCRFD) in all samples. Then, specimens were subjected to IA and FR tests. Data were analyzed with Student’s t, one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal Wallis-H tests. The correlation between IA and FR results was analyzed with a Pearson test. The statistical significance level was considered as 5%. RESULTS: While CCRSD showed superior IA results than SCRFD for all restorative materials (p < 0.05), no statistical difference was found between CCRSD and SCRFD in FR assessment (p > 0.05). In CCRSD, compomer showed superior results for IA and FR than glass ionomers (p < 0.05). In SCRFD, it was found no significant difference between the restoratives for IA (p > 0.05). However, compomer showed superior FR results than glass ionomers (p < 0.05). There was moderate negative correlation between internal voids and FR without statistically significant difference (r = −0.333, p = 0.072). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advantages of SCRFD, it was found to be less superior than CCRSD in IA assessment. Therefore, when SCRFD is preferred, a peripheral seal should be provided for ideal restorative treatment. On the other hand, compomer mostly showed superior results compared to others. PeerJ Inc. 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10064991/ /pubmed/37009156 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14825 Text en © 2023 Demirel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering Demirel, Akif Orhan, Ayşe Işıl Büyüksungur, Arda The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study |
title | The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study |
title_full | The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study |
title_fullStr | The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study |
title_short | The assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study |
title_sort | assessment of internal adaptation and fracture resistance of glass ionomer and resin-based restorative materials applied after different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: an in-vitro study |
topic | Bioengineering |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37009156 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demirelakif theassessmentofinternaladaptationandfractureresistanceofglassionomerandresinbasedrestorativematerialsappliedafterdifferentcariesremovaltechniquesinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT orhanayseisıl theassessmentofinternaladaptationandfractureresistanceofglassionomerandresinbasedrestorativematerialsappliedafterdifferentcariesremovaltechniquesinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT buyuksungurarda theassessmentofinternaladaptationandfractureresistanceofglassionomerandresinbasedrestorativematerialsappliedafterdifferentcariesremovaltechniquesinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT demirelakif assessmentofinternaladaptationandfractureresistanceofglassionomerandresinbasedrestorativematerialsappliedafterdifferentcariesremovaltechniquesinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT orhanayseisıl assessmentofinternaladaptationandfractureresistanceofglassionomerandresinbasedrestorativematerialsappliedafterdifferentcariesremovaltechniquesinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT buyuksungurarda assessmentofinternaladaptationandfractureresistanceofglassionomerandresinbasedrestorativematerialsappliedafterdifferentcariesremovaltechniquesinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy |