Cargando…

Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study

BACKGROUND: The longitudinal evaluation of students seems to be a better way to assess their knowledge compared with that of the traditional methods of evaluation, such as modular and final tests. Currently, progress testing is the most consolidated type of longitudinal testing method. However, desp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iyeyasu, Josie Naomi, Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario, de Carvalho, Keila Monteiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10065116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36197351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0092.R1.01072022
_version_ 1785018038475554816
author Iyeyasu, Josie Naomi
Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario
de Carvalho, Keila Monteiro
author_facet Iyeyasu, Josie Naomi
Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario
de Carvalho, Keila Monteiro
author_sort Iyeyasu, Josie Naomi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The longitudinal evaluation of students seems to be a better way to assess their knowledge compared with that of the traditional methods of evaluation, such as modular and final tests. Currently, progress testing is the most consolidated type of longitudinal testing method. However, despite being well consolidated as an assessment tool in medical education, the use of this type of test in residency programs is scarce. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate residents’ knowledge growth regarding residency training and to describe the implementation of a longitudinal evaluation test in ophthalmological residency training across several medical schools in Brazil. Finally, the study aimed to check whether performance in the tests can be used as a predictor of the results of the specialist title test. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a prospective observational study. This study was conducted using an online platform. METHODS: Online tests were developed following the same pattern as the Brazilian Ophthalmology Council specialist tests. All the residents performed the test simultaneously. The tests were conducted once a year at the end of the school year. RESULTS: A progress test was conducted across 13 services with 259 residents. Our results demonstrated that resident scores improved over the years (P < 0.0001) and had a moderate correlation with the Brazilian Opthalmology Council specialist test (P = 0.0156). CONCLUSION: The progress test can be considered a valuable tool to assess knowledge, meaning their knowledge increased over residency training. In addition, it can be used as a predictor of the result in the specialist title test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10065116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100651162023-04-01 Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study Iyeyasu, Josie Naomi Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario de Carvalho, Keila Monteiro Sao Paulo Med J Original Article BACKGROUND: The longitudinal evaluation of students seems to be a better way to assess their knowledge compared with that of the traditional methods of evaluation, such as modular and final tests. Currently, progress testing is the most consolidated type of longitudinal testing method. However, despite being well consolidated as an assessment tool in medical education, the use of this type of test in residency programs is scarce. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate residents’ knowledge growth regarding residency training and to describe the implementation of a longitudinal evaluation test in ophthalmological residency training across several medical schools in Brazil. Finally, the study aimed to check whether performance in the tests can be used as a predictor of the results of the specialist title test. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a prospective observational study. This study was conducted using an online platform. METHODS: Online tests were developed following the same pattern as the Brazilian Ophthalmology Council specialist tests. All the residents performed the test simultaneously. The tests were conducted once a year at the end of the school year. RESULTS: A progress test was conducted across 13 services with 259 residents. Our results demonstrated that resident scores improved over the years (P < 0.0001) and had a moderate correlation with the Brazilian Opthalmology Council specialist test (P = 0.0156). CONCLUSION: The progress test can be considered a valuable tool to assess knowledge, meaning their knowledge increased over residency training. In addition, it can be used as a predictor of the result in the specialist title test. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM 2022-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10065116/ /pubmed/36197351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0092.R1.01072022 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Iyeyasu, Josie Naomi
Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario
de Carvalho, Keila Monteiro
Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study
title Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study
title_full Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study
title_fullStr Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study
title_short Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study
title_sort longitudinal evaluation of the ophthalmology residents in brazil: an observational prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10065116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36197351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0092.R1.01072022
work_keys_str_mv AT iyeyasujosienaomi longitudinalevaluationoftheophthalmologyresidentsinbrazilanobservationalprospectivestudy
AT ceciliofernandesdario longitudinalevaluationoftheophthalmologyresidentsinbrazilanobservationalprospectivestudy
AT decarvalhokeilamonteiro longitudinalevaluationoftheophthalmologyresidentsinbrazilanobservationalprospectivestudy