Cargando…
No association between vitamin D status and COVID-19 infection in São Paulo, Brazil
In recent years the immunomodulatory actions of vitamin D, a steroid hormone, have been extensively studied. In 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the question arose as to 25(OH)D status would be related to susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection, since several studies pointed out a higher prevalenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10065340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33740339 http://dx.doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000343 |
_version_ | 1785018087037206528 |
---|---|
author | Brandão, Cynthia M. Álvares Chiamolera, Maria Izabel Biscolla, Rosa Paula Mello Lima, José Viana Ferrer, Cláudia M De Francischi Prieto, Wesley Heleno Russo, Pedro de Sá Tavares de Sá, José Lazari, Carolina dos Santos Granato, Celso Francisco H. Vieira, José Gilberto H |
author_facet | Brandão, Cynthia M. Álvares Chiamolera, Maria Izabel Biscolla, Rosa Paula Mello Lima, José Viana Ferrer, Cláudia M De Francischi Prieto, Wesley Heleno Russo, Pedro de Sá Tavares de Sá, José Lazari, Carolina dos Santos Granato, Celso Francisco H. Vieira, José Gilberto H |
author_sort | Brandão, Cynthia M. Álvares |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years the immunomodulatory actions of vitamin D, a steroid hormone, have been extensively studied. In 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the question arose as to 25(OH)D status would be related to susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection, since several studies pointed out a higher prevalence and severity of the disease in populations with low levels of 25(OH)D. Thus, we investigated the 25(OH)D levels in adults “Detected” positive for SARS CoV-2 by RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction) test, and in negative controls, “not Detected”, using the Fleury Group's examination database, in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Of a total of 14.692 people with recent assessments of 25(OH)D and RT-PCR tests for COVID-19, 2.345 were positive and 11.585 were negative for the infection. The groups did not differ in the percentage of men and women, or in the age distribution. There were no differences in the distribution of 25(OH)D between the two groups (p = 0.08); mean 25(OH)D of 28.8 ± 21.4 ng/mL and 29.6 ± 18.1 ng/mL, respectively. In the specific population studied, clinical, environmental, socioeconomic and cultural factors should have greater relevance than 25(OH)D in determining the susceptibility to COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10065340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100653402023-04-01 No association between vitamin D status and COVID-19 infection in São Paulo, Brazil Brandão, Cynthia M. Álvares Chiamolera, Maria Izabel Biscolla, Rosa Paula Mello Lima, José Viana Ferrer, Cláudia M De Francischi Prieto, Wesley Heleno Russo, Pedro de Sá Tavares de Sá, José Lazari, Carolina dos Santos Granato, Celso Francisco H. Vieira, José Gilberto H Arch Endocrinol Metab Brief Report In recent years the immunomodulatory actions of vitamin D, a steroid hormone, have been extensively studied. In 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the question arose as to 25(OH)D status would be related to susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection, since several studies pointed out a higher prevalence and severity of the disease in populations with low levels of 25(OH)D. Thus, we investigated the 25(OH)D levels in adults “Detected” positive for SARS CoV-2 by RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction) test, and in negative controls, “not Detected”, using the Fleury Group's examination database, in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Of a total of 14.692 people with recent assessments of 25(OH)D and RT-PCR tests for COVID-19, 2.345 were positive and 11.585 were negative for the infection. The groups did not differ in the percentage of men and women, or in the age distribution. There were no differences in the distribution of 25(OH)D between the two groups (p = 0.08); mean 25(OH)D of 28.8 ± 21.4 ng/mL and 29.6 ± 18.1 ng/mL, respectively. In the specific population studied, clinical, environmental, socioeconomic and cultural factors should have greater relevance than 25(OH)D in determining the susceptibility to COVID-19. Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10065340/ /pubmed/33740339 http://dx.doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000343 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Brandão, Cynthia M. Álvares Chiamolera, Maria Izabel Biscolla, Rosa Paula Mello Lima, José Viana Ferrer, Cláudia M De Francischi Prieto, Wesley Heleno Russo, Pedro de Sá Tavares de Sá, José Lazari, Carolina dos Santos Granato, Celso Francisco H. Vieira, José Gilberto H No association between vitamin D status and COVID-19 infection in São Paulo, Brazil |
title | No association between vitamin D status and COVID-19 infection in São Paulo, Brazil |
title_full | No association between vitamin D status and COVID-19 infection in São Paulo, Brazil |
title_fullStr | No association between vitamin D status and COVID-19 infection in São Paulo, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed | No association between vitamin D status and COVID-19 infection in São Paulo, Brazil |
title_short | No association between vitamin D status and COVID-19 infection in São Paulo, Brazil |
title_sort | no association between vitamin d status and covid-19 infection in são paulo, brazil |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10065340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33740339 http://dx.doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000343 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brandaocynthiamalvares noassociationbetweenvitamindstatusandcovid19infectioninsaopaulobrazil AT chiamoleramariaizabel noassociationbetweenvitamindstatusandcovid19infectioninsaopaulobrazil AT biscollarosapaulamello noassociationbetweenvitamindstatusandcovid19infectioninsaopaulobrazil AT limajoseviana noassociationbetweenvitamindstatusandcovid19infectioninsaopaulobrazil AT ferrerclaudiamdefrancischi noassociationbetweenvitamindstatusandcovid19infectioninsaopaulobrazil AT prietowesleyheleno noassociationbetweenvitamindstatusandcovid19infectioninsaopaulobrazil AT russopedrodesatavares noassociationbetweenvitamindstatusandcovid19infectioninsaopaulobrazil AT desajose noassociationbetweenvitamindstatusandcovid19infectioninsaopaulobrazil AT lazaricarolinadossantos noassociationbetweenvitamindstatusandcovid19infectioninsaopaulobrazil AT granatocelsofranciscoh noassociationbetweenvitamindstatusandcovid19infectioninsaopaulobrazil AT vieirajosegilbertoh noassociationbetweenvitamindstatusandcovid19infectioninsaopaulobrazil |